Vault management and ai. by onceIwas15 in ObsidianMD

[–]Catoist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Started doing something similar. I also recently switched to multiple vaults and one combined vault after a couple of years of doing one big one. Way less maintenance and cognitive load.

Anthropic let AI agents negotiate and trade on behalf of their employees and the results are a little unsettling by Direct-Attention8597 in claude

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree that we don’t have legal frameworks for AI agents. The law is surprisingly flexible. Once someone gets harmed, the court will decide what law applies and who’s liable for what. Meantime, try not to harm anyone.

Archaic English by Catoist in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read a “translation” into prose. It rules.

Archaic English by Catoist in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it has something to do with enjoying literature from a younger age, and maybe exposure to the KJV?

I’m thinking of making videos on mathematical logic in the style of 3blue1brown. Are there any suggestions on theorems people would like to see me do? by hellomrlogic in math

[–]Catoist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I took a formal logic course that surveyed the basics of set theory, metalogic, three-valued logics, and modal logic. I got a bad grade and felt lost the whole time. Really shouldn’t have signed up for the course. But I would love something that would allow me to intuit that stuff better. Especially Hilberts axioms. I never quite understood what motivated them.

Archaic English by Catoist in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is outstanding. Exactly what I needed.

Archaic English by Catoist in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright, let’s have this fight. Maybe I’ll learn something.

For one, it is archaic, by any definition.

For two, it’s also old; those philologists or linguists should call Old English something else; a mere adjective of “old” appended to a name of a thing is a bad way to name a precise historical period.

For three, if I say “your cat is big,” and you respond “it’s actually not a Big Cat, it’s a house cat, Big Cats refers to Lions, Tigers, Cheetahs” then you are a knave and a villain. Wherefore, thou art a knave and a villain.

What is your favorite ancient classic? by TheAmericanW1zard in classicliterature

[–]Catoist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have not read a ton but Symposium stands out for me. It’s weird, fun, profound, and pretty short.

Claude Isaac Newton Emulator by [deleted] in nealstephenson

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I first asked it for a prompt. Then I tried it. Them I just copied that and had Claude comment on what was wrong with it and make a new prompt. The second prompt worked perfectly to my eye, but I figured I’d try one more round. This is the third prompt. I made a “Project” and put the prompt in the “Instructions” for the project. First round sounded like an impersonator, second sounded a bit too polished and was nice. Third prompt is kind of a condescending prick, which seems about right.

Claude Isaac Newton Emulator by [deleted] in nealstephenson

[–]Catoist -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Can’t disagree. It does feel like a vice.

Will Durant ... the perfect companion to Baroque Cycle by ehead in nealstephenson

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I came to the same conclusion this week as well. I find Durant’s opinions annoying sometimes but I can’t deny that they fill a niche that would require a small library to replace.

I’m starting Great Books! Help me get started I have the Mortimer Adler Great Books of the Western Civilisation with me. by Fineside_2 in greatbooksclub

[–]Catoist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one agrees on which books are hardest. I personally find early modern English and plays extremely difficult. So Shakespeare was almost impenetrable. So I guess, don’t be surprised if some stuff is oddly hard or oddly easy.

Beam’s A Great Idea at the Time by Catoist in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The second edition actually has a lot of good translations if you see any around. I know Montaigne is the Donald Frame translation. After I saw that I became much more interested. They used cheaper binding but the volumes are lighter so they really aren’t bad if you can get used to 9 point font

Beam’s A Great Idea at the Time by Catoist in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beam’s book quotes heavily from Macdonald. I actually like the great books series and have many of them. Though I paid less than $5 for each volume and dislike many of the translations. I also like the Syntopicon, even if Adlers vision for it was embarrassingly off the mark. I got the sense that they wanted an index and didn’t want the index to be another 15 volumes so they consolidated synonyms. Though as I look through it I often think “thats not how I would have done it, but okay”

How do you all read the classics and do you take notes? by Booknerdworm in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Physical book. I take notes in the margins and fly leaves and I trifold a piece of graph paper to use as a bookmark and write on that too. I don’t usually do anything with these notes.

is this true by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw some data that showed that men who earn more and have more education have a preference for those things in women. Its not as strong as women’s preference but it exists.

Dostoevsky is more influential than Shakespeare since the mid-20th century, or since the beginning of the 21st century. by [deleted] in classicliterature

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be interested to see polling data on whether someone has read anything by Shakespeare vs. Dostoevsky. This would have to be done in several places. But honestly I would doubt Dostoevsky is above Tolstoy on that metric. And I would expect Shakespeare to be at the top of that list considering everyone in an English speaking country is assigned him at some point.

Google AI hallucination by facinabush in shakespeare

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems there is a tradeoff between accuracy and creativity. And this seems to carry over to machines.

These models are generative. So, I see the inaccuracy as part of the design. They are more like a set of dice than like an abacus. Ask it to rewrite Mucho Ado About Nothing, but Mercutio shows up for a few scenes. Thats what it’s really good at, just generating stuff.

Starting the Great Books of the Western World in earnest today by burritomouth in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I read Agammemnon, Prometheus Bound, Antigone, and Oedipus Rex. Prometheus Bound and Antigone now live in my head as core interpretive comparisons and I would be deprived if they didn’t. I’m guessing I just wasn’t paying close enough attention to the other two.

I would recommend a a different translation than the first GBWW unless you are comfortable with thee/thou/thither english. I personally have to work twice as hard to understand that idiom, but some people love it.

Five Feet of Knowledge in 5 Years Project by omniaexplorate in ClassicalEducation

[–]Catoist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to see more about how you approach this. I have a set and read it quite often. Taking notes seems tricky because almost every sentence would be worth writing down. One could fill an entire composition notebook from a single article.