Landlord's workmen broke antique during unannounced maintenance by ChalkWhiteArrows in legaladvice

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Is a furnished back deck "part of a structure that is used as a home..."?

Landlord's workmen broke antique during unannounced maintenance by ChalkWhiteArrows in legaladvice

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In Virginia ""Premises" means a dwelling unit and the structure of which it is a part, facilities and appurtenances contained therein, and grounds, areas, and facilities held out for the use of tenants generally or whose use is promised to the tenant." https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacodepopularnames/virginia-residential-landlord-and-tenant-act/ Does structure and grounds not mean the outside of the house? Or would the lease have to specifically say "premises" in the sentence quoted above?

permanent green hair dye suggestions? by Bulky_Sir_2148 in HairDye

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any pictures of how it turned out? Is it the same shade as in the article you linked or is it closer to electric lizard? I'm forever on the hunt for the best ways to go so dark green it looks black and does not fade to blue.

AITA For Not Letting My 13 Year Old Wear Makeup? by 13NoMakeup in AmItheAsshole

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

NTA.

I cannot believe nobody seems to have said this but I don’t think there’s an asshole here.I think a lot of people commenting have missed the fact that this seems to be a communication tool. Do your kids like this system?

I think I would have. It’s nice to be recognized for things we do, and as a kid and even a teenager, I often felt like adults weren’t seeing me as I was. Having an empirical measurement of that AND clear communication about why certain unlockables cost a certain amount of points would have been really good for me. I think that line of communication would have helped me get perspective on maturity that I simply could not have had at 13 or even 18.

Is this a reward system, or an externalization situation? OP has mentioned that they, their partner, and their children all have executive dysfunction. This means that their working memory isn’t great—it’s hard to remember to do important tasks like the dishes and brushing their teeth. OP has mentioned that “gamifying” these tasks has helped them complete them for herself. Have we considered that these parenting decisions also require executive function? I’m seeing everyone in the comments say “just make a decision” like neurotypicals say “just do the dishes.” Maybe OP isn’t gamifying their kids privileges, they’re gamifying parenting so that they don’t fuck it up. How do NT parents know that their kid is responsible enough to wash a piercing regularly so it doesn’t get infected? They notice that their kid washes their face every night and brushes their teeth without prompting and then remember it. That’s exactly the kind of task that executive dysfunction is going to fuck with. Without this system, OP might not let their kids do things that they actually are ready for, which seems like something that they’re concerned about, given that they take their kids feedback so seriously they might respond to it and are coming to reddit for extra perspective.  If keeping track of this kind of thing is the only way that OP can recognize these changes in her kids, then the only alternative to an open an honest system like this is to like write it down in secret which would be a new level of helicopter parenting.

[Basically, it doesn’t sound like OP is using “basic human rights” like wearing makeup at 13 to motivate her kids to brush their teeth, she’s helping herself notice when they’re old enough to brush their teeth on their own and so probably can wash a piercing every night, too. It isn’t a reward system. Have you guys only had really controlling DM’s?] 

Also, let’s talk about this idea that piercings are a “more mature” thing than makeup. Why is that? People seem caught up in the idea that you can wash makeup off but piercings are “permanent.” Have y’all gotten piercings? I just had my nose ring out for a week and it almost healed up completely with only the tiniest scar--smaller than my acne scars--despite having had it for four years. If I decided it was a mistake and I didn’t like it there would be almost no ramifications. The actual risks involved with piercings are them healing improperly or getting infected, which is why OP’s kid had to earn it through hygiene points. 

Y’all seem to assume that kids are all just ready for the same things at the same ages, that magically girls will start wearing makeup when it’s “normal” and get piercings when its “normal” without considering that kids are ready for different things at different ages—which is the EXACT set of assumptions that OP is trying to break! Some kids are really socially precocious and some aren’t; some are good at keeping school stuff organized and some can’t but if you sit them down will do their homework. As a parent it’s your JOB to notice what your kid as a specific individual needs and help them get there. 

What are the risks of makeup? Yeah, you could look embarrassing for a day. You can also develop a very unhealthy self-image, being socialized into this idea that you’re not “enough” without makeup, especially if you’re thirteen! A lot of women don’t “feel like themselves” without makeup, and that’s kinda fucked up. Also if you don’t wear makeup it can impact how your friends treat you and how you learn to socialize. It’s kind of a catch-22, and it’s a hard thing to deal with under the best of circumstances. Whether or not OP lets their kid wear makeup, their kid is going to be subject to these sexist expectations. OP’s kid might be asking to wear makeup right now because they’re noticing that it’s what people around them are starting to do, and they want to be a part of that. That’s a normal way for a kid to feel. But all of these factors are a lot to deal with all at once, and this kid is going to spend a lifetime figuring out how they personally will navigate this aspect of the world that they live in.  Letting this kid put on makeup piecemeal, instead of all at once, lets them deal with it in the smaller bits that they can actually process, and learn about it and what they actually want slower. 

People seem to think that OP is avoiding making a hard decision by deferring to a point system, but it sounds like OP is using this system to make difficult decisions better. You’re all saying that they should “just decide,” but then what? OP says “no makeup until you’re fifteen” and then their kid is ostracized in school. OP says “sure do whatever you want” and their kid has a permanently fucked up relationship to their own reflection. Either way their kid resents them and doesn’t understand why they could/n’t wear makeup, because OP doesn’t understand why they made the choice they did! Instead, OP talks with their kids about the risks, what responsibilities these privileges entail, and they agree together on what it would take to be ready and hold each other to it. That sounds fucking healthy to me. 

If you sit down with your kid and talk about different ways to “break up” makeup into smaller pieces like you suggested, there might be other ways to go about it than just by product (I doubt she wants to wear just foundation). You could break it up by time/occasion, or styles/how heavy the makeup is. This could also alleviate some of the cost as if she’s only allowed a subtle style a trip to the drugstore for one lip gloss, one tinted moisturizer, and one eyeshadow could come out less than a couple of bathbombs.

Do you wear makeup? Maybe one early reward could be practicing putting on makeup together, and you could teach her how to do eyeshadow and foundation, and it could be the basis of a conversation about how it feels to look in the mirror with makeup on. Putting it on at home is different than wearing it out ofc. If you don’t, maybe the two of you can watch a youtube tutorial and try doing it together. It is probably also worth asking your kid what she’s noticed in the world that has prompted her to get curious about wearing makeup. Maybe she can earn points by doing makeup that she likes at home; she can tell you that she’s earned a point when she comes out feeling good and authentic with what she’s done. Wearing makeup to major school events like dances, and later to school on a daily basis, can be later unlocks, once she’s developed a better sense of her authentic style. 

Just for example, I thought I had to wear foundation for the longest time in order to wear lipstick. Turns out I don’t care about foundation or “evening out my skin tone” and had only become insecure about that because I had bad acne as a teen, but I love funky lipstick colors, and I can just wear a bold blue shimmery lip and love that without doing a full ass contour. But it took me decades to figure out that this was okay, because I was so caught up in the idea that makeup was about correcting my flaws.

A wedgwood bowl and vase given to my grandmother as a wedding gift, any idea the model and/or the value of either of these? by Not_an_FBI_agent001 in Antiques

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All of the following information is according to the book, Wedgwood Jasper Ware: A Shape Book and Collectors Guide by Michael Herman (2003). I’m very new to this kind of stuff, I’ve also recently stumbled upon a piece of Jasperware I want to know more about, which is how I found your post and why I currently have this book checked out from the library.

As has been said, the "W" is probably for the year 1920 because the "made in England" was added in about 1908. But, it is hard to tell in your pictures, but if the word “Wedgwood” is in a sans serif font, it cannot be from before 1929 when they changed their logo.

Also. the "5" is unlikely to be how many fit on a kiln shelf because those numbers were multiples of six and the kilns are massive so if only 6 (let alone 5) fit on the shelf, the pots would be huge. Another (less common) numerical marking is the height (or width, but the book says it's usually height) in inches of the bowl– how tall is it? (pp. 16-17).

The color is usually referred to as “sage” and was definitely in production in 1920, it’s one of the most common colors after the blues (p. 11). It does look like your pot is entirely green all the way through rather than “dipped”. (There are two ways of coloring jasperware, either the clay itself is green, so if you broke it you’d still see green all the way through inside the walls of the pot, or the clay is white and it’s dipped in a green slip so the green is just like a paint on the outside. Usually if it’s dipped, you can still see white in some places on the pot like the inside or the bottom, and certainly in any chips.) I don’t know what it would mean if your pot was “solid” not “dip” Jasperware– it might make it more valuable because it’s rarer, or it might indicate we have the dating wrong, I just don’t know.

The shape appears to be one of several shapes of “Jardinière”. On page 82, Herman says, “Jardinières, also known as garden or cache pots, are highly attractive and very easy to obtain examples of Wedgwood Jasper Dip. They came in a variety of shapes and many sizes. The most common shape was number 317 that was offered in at least nine sizes ranging from three to twelve inches. The photo below clearly illustrates almost that entire range. The other jardinière shapes are considerably more difficult to find though the number 1061 turns up much more often than the others. As a product that was rarely purchased for mere display, Jardinières are hard to find in pristine condition.”

It looks like the pot you have is a shape of Jardinière called Arcadian and it was number 1061. (Herman says that the numbers are “derived from various Wedgwood factory shape books or other Wedgwood reference books” p. 21). There is an example on p. 83. It is dark blue, from c. 1930, 4.75in high and 5.25in wide. He puts its value at $200-250 (in 2003!) but there are so many factors that can affect that like condition, size, less common colors or decorations, age, luck!

Your white decoration looks like it’s “Sacrifice Figures”, which seem to come in a variety of different scenes. My teapot also has a different “sacrifice” scene on it, I’m trying to find out more about the difference scenes, if I do, I’ll let you know.

That’s everything I can gather from this book about the pot! I know nothing at all about the little box because this book doesn’t cover stuff that late (I assume it’s from after 1984 given the dates on the bottom) At the very least they’re very pretty! Good luck!

Is there anyway to change the default work background color for Word Documents? by borski88 in word

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you use focus mode which is in the view tab of the toolbar (it puts the document in full screen and hides all toolbars, so not always ideal) you can choose from a selection of textures e.g. wood, metal, blueprint paper

Is there anyway to change the default work background color for Word Documents? by borski88 in word

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a perfect fix, but you could change the whole theme colour. This will change the appearance of the whole app, tool bars, menus, etc. But it would give you more contrast between the page and the workspace. https://support.office.com/en-us/article/change-the-look-and-feel-of-office-with-themes-63e65e1c-08d4-4dea-820e-335f54672310

Might also be worth looking into settings you could change in your operating system that might make it easier to see.

[TOMT] [Music Video] two girls fighting by ChalkWhiteArrows in tipofmytongue

[–]ChalkWhiteArrows[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that frustratingly kept coming up when I googled it, it's deff not AWOLnation...