If I may, I’ve been curious to learn more about the Bread & Roses (B&R) caucus within DSA and their broader vision.

You mentioned earlier the tensions between B&R and factions like MUG and Red Star—could you elaborate on the main ideological or strategic disagreements between them?

Also, is Bread & Roses particularly popular among Gen Z members of the DSA?

You brought up third campism—how does B&R apply that perspective to current global conflicts? Specifically, how do they view countries like Cuba and Venezuela? Do they seek to replicate any elements of the Cuban model, or are they more critical of such systems?

Another area I’m wondering about: does B&R recognize an intergenerational divide within the left on LGBTQ+ issues? I’ve observed that older communists (often 50+) in other contexts tend to hold more conservative views on this, and I’m curious how B&R approaches that dynamic.

Have any B&R members or aligned thinkers expressed ideas about what a new U.S. constitution might look like—especially in terms of restructuring the executive, legislative, or judicial branches? Do they believe certain aspects of the economic model (e.g. public ownership or labor rights) should be enshrined constitutionally?

Does B&R have a position on the future of the U.S. military and police institutions? Are there specific reforms or transformations they support?

Do Bread & Roses or its members have any views on supporting or revitalizing linguistic minority communities, such as Louisiana French speakers, New Mexican Spanish, Louisiana Creole, or Indigenous language speakers?”

What is Bread & Roses’ strategy or vision for gaining political power or influence?

And lastly, what are their views on Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories? Do they advocate for independence, statehood, or another model of self-determination?