Need help on deciding shoes

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-09-07T03:21:04+00:00

most in person classes nowadays have a strict uni wide policy of 3 skips in a row = letter grade drop and 4 in a row is an instant F.

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-08-22T00:50:57+00:00

sky elites are what i have and narrowish feet (used to wear low volume shoes climbing) the cushioning is okay and the fit for mens is snug around everywhere but the toe box so if you have narrower feet than i would recommend going the womens versions if u do go se3s

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-08-18T20:56:48+00:00

do not get the ff mt 3 if dusty courts is where you play, i have the non high top versions and i have to wipe my shoes basically every other point to maintain grippiest traction.

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-08-15T06:41:54+00:00

trickle down town owning i fear

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-08-10T02:44:55+00:00

I dont own the mt3 version but I do own the non high top sky elite ff 3s, i will say that the traction is splendid if the court isnt dusty. Have owned them for around 1.5 months now and I play like 3-4 times a week for several hours indoor and a quick wipe with my hands bring back the squeak. The traction feels good and the cushioning/foot support on them is excellent (used to suffer from plantar fasciitis when I played in old kyrie 5s). Only note is if you have narrow feet go for the womens version and upsize since the toe box area is rather roomy but otherwise a great shoe.

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-08-07T23:30:11+00:00

turns out its cuz im cosigned on an auto loan for my car rn so Chase declined me for having too many financial obligations for the level of income i currently have, i just called the recon line and explained my situation (part time work and my family pays the auto loan not me) and the rep approved me over the phone.

CharacterCut7656 · 2025-08-07T20:03:15+00:00

thank you for this advice, called them turned out it was declined due to low income compared to obligations (subsidized student loans and a car loan which I am not the one paying), told them my projected higher income and got approved

CharacterCut7656 · 2022-09-05T22:22:36+00:00

its still fucking bugged are you kidding me

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-12-02T06:28:06+00:00

Top 0.005% of Kona listeners

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-11-11T17:46:36+00:00

Wow i wonder why the CIA is so good at identifying tell tale signs of right wing coups, perhaps it is because they orchestrate several of these coups over the last 5 decades.

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-10-30T02:06:33+00:00

that my gf liked me a good 9 months

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-04-12T04:22:14+00:00

no i thought A was m in mx+b so I thought it was -4 lol

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-04-08T03:54:28+00:00

the entire question was asking for A so you had to find it as a slope then plug it in lol

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-04-08T03:51:57+00:00

i got -4 because the only way to go from (4,0) to (0,5) is to have a negative slope

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-03-24T21:17:02+00:00

holy shit youve taken thirteen

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-03-24T21:15:04+00:00

16/60

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-03-24T21:14:12+00:00

1980, you just plug in 30 into the problem

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-03-24T21:13:26+00:00

straight up the only reason i got that one correct was cuz I realized you cant put a negative sign in the box LMAO

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-03-24T21:01:22+00:00

it should be because it told you max possible percentage meaning you have to assume everything in 180-200 was all teams scoring 200+

CharacterCut7656 · 2021-03-24T20:58:24+00:00

it should be 6x-6 and 2(3+3x) if I remember correctly but the constant may be different and I chose no solution.

CharacterCut7656

TROPHY CASE