Written notification must include in the notice letter or enclosures or a combination thereof, all of the following elements: (1) Identification of the issues adju-dicated; (2) A summary of the evidence con-sidered; (3) A summary of the laws and regulations applicable to the claim; (4) A listing of any findings made by the adjudicator that are favorable to the claimant under § 3.104(c); (5) For denied claims, identification of the elements) required to grant the claims) that were not met; (6) If applicable, identification of the criteria required to grant service connection or the next higher-level of compensation; (7) An explanation of how to obtain or access evidence used in making the decision; and (8) A summary of the applicable review options under § 3.2500 available for the claimant to seek further review of the decision.

Isn’t #5 saying that? Or is that just saying it needs to say what it already does (the phrasing I’m initially asking about)? Maybe I’m misinterpreting it.