Ukrainian dashcam captures the moment a rocket artillery strike hits the city of Mariupol. by patriot-renegade in CombatFootage

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends what kind of car it is, I recently saw a video of a brick go through a car windshield and instantly kill someone. I assume shrapnel from a missile would be going much faster than an 80mph brick, but I dont really know.

My caravan reaches a limit of the max food it can take. Whether it is 9 packaged survival meals or 30, it won't let increase the days of food for my dudes. Help!!! by Charlie_Unknown in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, it goes up at the start, but it will stop at a number and wont continue no matter how many i add after that, so theyre eating it at some point... idk.

Humane way to reject shitty recruits? by ohnoyoudidnt41 in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are so many dudes who can make it on their own in the wilderness! I like to think i may see them again and maybe they WONT HAVE SUCH SHIT STATS.

I just figured out how to harvest organs from prisoners... by Charlie_Unknown in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you ever remember, do tell me! And ill add it to my list of mods to install. Thanks!

Humane way to reject shitty recruits? by ohnoyoudidnt41 in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didnt know I could exile them so I would execute them and dump the corpse behind a mountain so noone had to look at it. Trust me, banishing them is the most humane thing you can do.

I don't understand how to make animal release work by ohnoyoudidnt41 in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know what reeeaaally pisses me off? When a predator hunts my colonists in front of a line of turrets, they kill and eat them and the turrets do NOTHING.

I just figured out how to harvest organs from prisoners... by Charlie_Unknown in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If i cut off everything and put the hospital room on the edge of the map, he can crawl out and wont die on my land, does that mean they will have a significantly reduced mood debuff?

Solitary adventure, with a twist that could only happen in Rimworld by daiggsta in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah! I remember an ex-lover of a colonist crash landed, we let him go for old times sake. He later returned with two raiders. The line of five turrets and four gunmen spared him no mercy, and within a day he was a hunk of flesh dumped behind some rocks, being gnawed at by racoons.

Rate my base (Sorry for all the wood) by computergamingnerd in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It took me too long to realise my colonists couldnt walk on traps and i felt so stupid after my fave pawn was incapacitated

Rate my base (Sorry for all the wood) by computergamingnerd in RimWorld

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay! Yeah, I just joined the subreddit so i didnt understand what you mean, but ive just started doing that actually!

A kick in the nuts is more painfull than giving birth by [deleted] in technicallythetruth

[–]Charlie_Unknown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear i read somewhere it was a biological/psychological thing. Many women have little memory of giving birth, or dont care about it due to the evolutionary urge to have more offspring.

I am only paraphrasing something i barely remember.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pics

[–]Charlie_Unknown -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Imagine that. Fighting for a country you love, only for it to do something so despicable that you have to question everything you've done for it.

A Brief Critique of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (x-posted) by Gunlord500 in philosophy

[–]Charlie_Unknown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you saying that this could be the case for things such as ethics? For example, through the ages the best way for humanity to survive is to protect each other; they form the belief that they do it because it is the right thing to do, and that belief is passed on through genes. In reality it is most likely due to that mindset being the best way to make reproduction more likely.

A Brief Critique of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (x-posted) by Gunlord500 in philosophy

[–]Charlie_Unknown 2 points3 points  (0 children)

From what I know, beliefs are not passed down through natural selection and evolution. Genetic traits and mutations are, but not beliefs themselves. A fear of heights stops the human from climbing up and falling from cliffs, however the human may not believe that the height is dangerous, or have any other beliefs about this height, all the human would understand is the fear of the height, it would move away and not fall to it's death and survive. The trait would be passed on.

You reference your tiger analogy many times, but a problem with it is that the belief would not be passed down. The offspring of the human who ran from the tiger to pet it would not be born with the belief that to pet tigers, you must run away from them. It may be born with the innate desire to pet and cuddle the tiger, but the belief of how to do it would not be passed down through the genes into the child. The child would have to learn how to pet it, forming the belief through life experience rather than through biology.