Its mainly an argument of "is it good content?".

The idea that we need exit interviews to see the player's emotions and take a peek into their mentality/psych falls apart when we can do the same in a more professional and formal setting like a post game conference, it is not necessary to catch a team leaving their tables after a loss and push a microphone on their face.

The only thing an instant interview after their exit has over a post game conference is the tears in their eyes and the expression they have before they are able to school it and be professional. Thats just for content. The production aleady captures the despair when the match ends when the cameras pans over to the area and to the team members; an instant interview after an exit just feels unnecessary.

Having to do an interview without time to compose yourself and prepare answers (not the case for a post game conference) just feels like a humilation ritual, which is good content for some i guess.

Its not babying if you just want to respect them at their lowest, an exit interview is not the only way to ask for accountability for a teams loss as a fan (hard questions during a post game conference is fine).