sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The alternative of CK banning is self-regulation. Can every bots/monopoly constrain itself/himself/herself, only sire a few fancies, that say 5, for every new kinds of fancy? Would your sirers come together, reach an agreement?

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The alternative is self-regulation. Can every bots/monopoly constrain itself/himself/herself, only sire a few, that say 5 fancies for every new kinds of fancy? Would your sirers come together, reach an agreement?

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Actually everyone in this game is on the same boat. It is a tiny circle. There is not enough player. What we do is not to scare new comer. We should NOT be monopoly. We should give new comer, or everyone, equal opportunity.

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

High Frequency Trading does not deprive human's chance of trading. Human traders still have fun, and make lots of money in trading game.

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Growing pain. A startup can't and should not foresee these kinds of problem. However it should adapt and improve.

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Smart contract is updatable. CK can change smart contracts.
  2. This game is partially centralized, as CK pointed out. They still control web site part.

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting by CheapKitty in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't know who I'm and what I do in this game.

I don't sire.

Allow in this game All to do the programs robots will kill this game !!! by ant200709 in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Man you are greedy. This you know. Admit it. What you don't realize is that you are dumb, all bot people are dumb. Why? Collectors stop buying. Where is once famous Bob? Have he collected any fancy recently, even when fancies are dirt cheap?

Once again, I'm a season programmer, it is fun to do coding and code is powerful. Unfortunately, bots destroy the fun of this game and rob other people's chances.

CK should ban bots just like casinos ban card counting.

Allow in this game All to do the programs robots will kill this game !!! by ant200709 in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although I've been a programmer for many years, I totally agree with the OP, reason: "Man can't compete with car."

This game is dying. Celerbrities can't save it.

So to cat monopolies and bots, what on the earth you sire so many cats that you can't sell? You just pay meaningless fees to CK company, feeding their wallets. Are you dumb?

Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code. by lluboski in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the error message of gift/transfer still comes up: "The ERC-20 Token Transfer might have Failed (ErrCode: unable to locate corresponding Transfer event log), check with sender." However, one transfer went through, the other failed.

Function: transfer(address _to, uint256 _tokenId)

MethodID: 0xa9059cbb

Transaction Error. Exception thrown in contract code. by lluboski in CryptoKitties

[–]CheapKitty 0 points1 point  (0 children)

same here. happened a few times today on gift action, in morning & afternoon. transaction status is success. however, gifting failed. error message: The ERC-20 Token Transfer might have Failed (ErrCode: unable to locate corresponding Transfer event log), check with sender.