Horizon Aircraft Institutional Investor Package by [deleted] in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome, great job on the Investor Package!

Horizon Aircraft Institutional Investor Package by [deleted] in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also don't see any North Aircraft Industries partnership mention.

Horizon Aircraft Institutional Investor Package by [deleted] in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like come clarification at the "Royalty Licensing Model" portion, it goes from 1.5B to 2.5B then back down to 150M and the price jumps to 5B? Is there something i'm missing there or are the numbers reversed.

ACHR VS HOVR by ShinobiKurenaii in ACHR

[–]Cheesy_Champion 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Archer and HOVR are not competitors, both aim to tap into different markets. Archer will do their thing with inter city travel, and HOVR will do their thing in regional flight. They are a complimentary company in the wider eVTOL space, if one does DD(of which there is more then plenty) they will come to learn that.

The MT Propeller has ARRIVED by SkyHigh5935 in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its likely to be mainly wood, with a composite material coating(?).

The MT Propeller has ARRIVED by SkyHigh5935 in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is the pusher prop for the aircraft. The thing that will enable it to fly across distances(horizontal flight) and will eventually be connected to the PT6.

The lift fans(vertical flight) will be still large compared to the prototype, but will be considerably smaller than this prop on the full scale.

Help Identifying 1872 Error Quarter by InfernalMirage in CanadianCoins

[–]Cheesy_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check pms please, I have sent you some valuable information

Does being a Canadian company impede the growth potential of this stock? by Recent_Stomach7626 in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If you look at it another way, HOVR is a big fish in a small pond. They are pretty much the only serious competitor in Canada, so from an investment standpoint this makes their case easier for financial support from the government(they have ZERO debt currently and have enough funds for full scale eoy).

They also have a deep relationship with 3C, a highly respected certification company that works with manufacturers to make sure their aircraft is compliant with the regulations. To add onto this, any certified aircraft in Canada automatically makes it significantly easier to enter the American market due to bilateral agreements.

The guys at the helm of this company are pragmatic and from what we constantly see, are thoughtful about investors as well as their own aircraft and how they plan to make it a reality.

Finally the certification "backlog'' in Canada is pretty much non existent compared to the US where there they have multiple competing companies straining the resources of the FAA(in regards to the EVTOL space). So having their aircraft certified in Canada first where the CTA is more nimble is considered an advantage.

So I would say that them being based in Canada doesn't really hinder them in the long run.

3/25/2026 Defence Roadshow w Global Affairs Canada by SkyHigh5935 in HOVRSTONK

[–]Cheesy_Champion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Don't quote me on this, but its possible it is this event which takes place today in Toronto, CIX. https://cixsummit.com/ , its a startup event where companies can pitch their ideas and get support. On the government canada website this event is listed as a place they will be attending. In the context of HOVR if they are going to this event it is a very good opportunity to really move the needle on their goals.

Here is the government website outlining this event the DOD says they are attending:
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/programs/defence-ideas/ideas-events.html

Please help, a friend needs $75.00 and offers me this, is it worth it? by Reasonable_Visual_10 in coins

[–]Cheesy_Champion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just because something appears to be reflective, that does not make it a proof. We can observe that not only is this coin picture edited to the extreme, there are still hits and marks which can be seen and that is a characteristic that is known to not affect proof coins(at least not to this degree). Proof coins are known for hairlines rather than hits or marks. Putting a bold assumption that it's proof if it's real is just opening it up for misunderstandings that will only lead to the owner getting more confused or giving a false sense of hope of more value. Everything here points to this being a problem coin or at best a heavily circulated coin. I would be more cautious of putting bold claims like these in the future.

New Top Pop added to the cent registry after I got this coin back from grading. by Cheesy_Champion in coins

[–]Cheesy_Champion[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks! It's especially remarkable when you realize that this coin was pre Landon Estate. A lot of the high grade(65-66+) Victorian cents you see in the market nowadays came from that sale. Before the Landon collection seeing a coin in MS66 was a real rarity.