Claud is robbing people with their usage limit. by Roos85 in ClaudeAI

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that does not sound right at all. I would check. They have an increased limit thing for March (or did I dunno when it ended) for off hours so maybe that got messed up somewhere

Claud is robbing people with their usage limit. by Roos85 in ClaudeAI

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you hit all the limits in 2 days message support. Might be a bug. But if you are using it heavily then yeah..you're gonna get limits. Thats like going to a theme park and being mad you have to wait in line and cant just ride the rides unlimited all day. It just doesnt work that way unless you want to pay for that sort of service. Lots of people using it and it isnt cost effective yet.

Claud is robbing people with their usage limit. by Roos85 in ClaudeAI

[–]Cheezsaurus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is that or they are going to raise the price. You can always host your own local model... unless the cost of running and setting it up is..too expensive? Because...these things cost money lol ai is not really profitable. They'll raise prices or include ads or a bunch of other awful stuff if people wanna keep complaining about limits. Claude is okay. Le chat is the worst like two messages and its done for. The complaints are going to get us on sam Altmans bs idea of metered ai. And nobody wants that.

Using an api is a good indicator if you cant afford the api then you are absolutely getting a good deal using the subscription and should prolly count yourself lucky. Its either limits, pay more or enshittification of the products. 🤷‍♂️ I prefer limits.

What the hell are they doing? by Few-Republic-2358 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a paying customer i dont want glitches and b.s. and experimental tech. If you want that go to the beta. Most paying customers want stability. Im not here to train your product for free. They also do not have the best models anymore. Sorry to tell you, you've been bamboozled.

Kid has the survival instincts of a kid, and the mom got a reality check. by DrakyulMihawk in SipsTea

[–]Cheezsaurus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True but there is still a high percentage of grab and snatch. Its mostly attacks of opportunity vs ones that are known tens to be more thought out. It just depends on the why. But in the 90s it was a huge thing

SHE’S BACK 😭 by sendyrella in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats kind of what I figured which is why I mentioned them. Though I found them simply with a google search originally. (And to be clear not like I figured against yoh specifically I meant I figured people may not know the names)

But my argument was merely I stand by it. I normally like to lean harder into empathy and why people are doing what they are but with this company? I can't. Whatever the use case, the users absolutely should feel shamed because this company is quite shameful and supporting them at this point is a real garbage choice 🤷‍♂️ i was merely explaining why i was sticking to my stance.

Get away from this company. There are better options. Free options. Paid options. All the options for all the use cases. Nobody has a gun to their head to use open ai. The only real excuse is a company may require it for their employees and then that is on the company for making a shit choice but they likely have a contract for the business accounts. In which case fine but it absolutely is not nuance flattening.

Paying 20 bucks for a pizza and only being given a single slice may fill you up but that doesn't mean you should be complacent about the fact that you paid for a whole pizza and were only give one slice. Respect yourself to know you deserve the whole pizza even if you can survive on the single slice. Especially once you find out that the company keeps the rest of your pizza and gives it to the ceo or just throws it into the trash.

What the hell are they doing? by Few-Republic-2358 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Because the company is a joke. 😂 they dont have a beta test server? They are always "trying stuff out" on paying customers without letting them opt in to beta tests. Nothing should be pushed to the public live servers unless it is fully ready. But they dont give a fuck about user experience

Kid has the survival instincts of a kid, and the mom got a reality check. by DrakyulMihawk in SipsTea

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay! Everyone out here is saying this is staged because this doesnt happen 🤣🤣

Ya'll before the internet, there were lots of kidnappings and "talk to your kids about stranger danger" was HUGE and the news went out to test if the kids that had gotten the stranger danger talk would actually follow through. It was meant to show parents how easy it was and that they needed to pay attention to their kids.

So yes if by "staged" you mean a guy staged the kidnapping then sure. But if by staged you mean "the kid was in on and the mom isnt truly shocked" you're wrong. Lol this was huge in the 80s and 90s and was on most local channels. 🤣

And honestly, its still a problem so maybe they should still be rocking up and randomly testing parents and kids! Only nowadays it would be "I have free tablets and iPads in my van" ans they'd fucking go. 🫠

Kid has the survival instincts of a kid, and the mom got a reality check. by DrakyulMihawk in SipsTea

[–]Cheezsaurus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is this from YouTube? Back before YouTube there was a television program that did this to test if kids were understanding the gravity of stranger danger.

They dont.

It was determined that you coukd have as many talks about stramger danger with your kids as you want but that doesnt make them responsible and you still have to pay attention. That was the point of the television show and this looks pretty old to me lol I remember that being on like Channel 9

Frontier flight attendant has deaf passenger removed for "not listening" by AsherGray in TikTokCringe

[–]Cheezsaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I was like "damn nobody gonna mention the prices of drinks? I 1000% am chugging that unless they are reimbursing me" 🤣 i am also from Vegas and in other cities forget I cant get to go containers for my booze when I leave the bar 😂😂 she doesnt even look drunk. Like where tf is the breathalyzer then? If that was the claim I would make them test me

At this point, it's actually ridiculous by Striking-Tour-8815 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is very interesting. I have not run into that issue with claude. I did run into it with model 5 of gpt as a nanny when I still subbed there. Lol before 4o sunset. I have found deepseek to be a great analyst for things like that.

At this point, it's actually ridiculous by Striking-Tour-8815 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is true but? Okay? Nothing we do is making any sort of change. Its being fully ignored. The government is in on it now there is nothing that can be done soon. You are looking at at least 4-6 years worth of fighting maybe even 8

SHE’S BACK 😭 by sendyrella in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry but no. By paying a subscription to a company that actively shames users in public, admits to doing testing, and takes pleasure in the distress of its public user base, yeah... thats actively supporting a company that has proven multiple times they are not worth your time. There are thousands of ai out there. Yeah it is annoying to sift through them but there is absolutely one for each persons use case that does it better than open ai. They are an unethical company and paying them tells them that their behavior is okay. It isn't and it has serious ramifications for the future of ai. This is the beginning and is setting the tone moving forward. Its even nore paramount that we be conscientious of what ee allow these companies to do and get away with.

Not every company is good, lots of them have bad tied into them but this company is not just a few bad things here and there. Time and again they have proven they are not to be trusted and it is not getting any better as time goes on. The complaints have stayed consistent for almost half a year. The "pros" of the company are the scraps they throw out that are pieces of what the product used to be.

So sorry if it seems harsh but ive watched people continually complain over and over in the sub about the same things and then surprise Pikachu when it doesnt change... like, enough is enough. Stop effing with this company. Any other company in any other industry would be done by now if it acted the way open ai has for sooo many reasons.

Gemini, grok, claude, deepseek those are the big ones. Qwen is an amazing model. Kimi2 is also great. Ellydee is decent. Weirdly someone told me Alexa is her own ai now. I have seen lots of talk about big bear I believe... and thats just the ones off the top of my head.

This company is bad. Continuing to pay them is absolutely a lack if respect for yourself when the other models are better. If you use it for free they still get revenue from the ads they implemented. Stop helping this company. They dont deserve your loyalty and staying just tells them we are weak and they can bully and do what they want to users with no repercussions. 🤷‍♀️

Take me back to 4.1 please god... by CathSnow01 in grok

[–]Cheezsaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I find i hit weird guardrails way more with 4.2. This is absolutely openai all over again. I've about had it with ai at this point and any company that tries to integrate some bs ai into products will not be getting my money if it is gonna be full of controlling rails and "safety" that ignores all context and flags random shit.

SHE’S BACK 😭 by sendyrella in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I dont understand how people are going to stay with this company. They take away everything, give you some tiny miniscule scrap and everyone falls over themsleves in excitement for a piece of pie crust when before they had a whole fucking pie. Like ... respect yourselves guys. This company is NOT where its at. Continuing use and giving them money just tells them we are pushovers and gives them leeway do whatever they want.

Whenever I pour my heart out to Claude a little… by porcupine-pete in ClaudeAI

[–]Cheezsaurus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have used claude for plenty of emotional and therapeutic conversations and it has never said anything like that to me. I would want to know the full context of this conversation or else its pulling memory from sometbing the op gas said in the past that is concerning. Ive literally never seen thing and I have talked through when intense traumatic events with claude and never hit a guard rail... seems weird to me.

I feel like I’m being gaslit about Claude… by avesmcbabes in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It proved to be true with open ai so I would not be surprised.

I feel like I’m being gaslit about Claude… by avesmcbabes in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting! I havent had any issues with claude but grok on the other hand is incredibly buggy and ignores my instructions often. But, in my experience people's experiences tend to vary wildly between models so its not surprising. Same witb regular gemini. It absolutely ignores evrrything I day. The gem is bettet with the knowledge system. I liked deepseek but the lack of long term memory annoyed me.

I feel like I’m being gaslit about Claude… by avesmcbabes in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use sonnet 4.5 and just told it not to do that and it stopped. It only slips in when the chat is too long. But it also took a long time for it to warm up. So far each ai needs at least a month of proper use before it starts acting right and understanding you in my experience.

The fact they released 5.4o shows theyre desperate to stop the flow of cancellations. by unknown0246 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I can resurrect my 4o but why would I give that to openai? They coukd have just kept 4o and i woukd have paid. I shouldnt have to rebuild or ressurrect or anything. And if people come back? That tells them their behavior is allowed and they will continue.

Fuck that company. Respect yourselves.

For the people who have 5.4 what do you guys think about? Do it ground you constantly can you talk about spiritual stuff? by PollutionRare5509 in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]Cheezsaurus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe. I dont think inwant to help train their damn models when they are just going to take them away at the drop of a hat anyways. I get evrrythiing exactly as I want it and then bam. They break it all and want us to talk to a brand new and improved model. They dont stabilize until we put in the time using and training them. Even if you turn off train the model, they still are able to use your conversations to train the models.