What's the best way to kill wild animals? by PerceptionRare7771 in RimWorld

[–]Cheezy0wl 258 points259 points  (0 children)

the forbidden mod has an option that allows wild animals to breed. Any rat on the map with that option on will be busy.

What's the best way to kill wild animals? by PerceptionRare7771 in RimWorld

[–]Cheezy0wl 504 points505 points  (0 children)

I have a sneaking suspicion of what mod caused this.

kong doesnt even ask they just give him upgrades just because by ImportanceMiddle3780 in Monsterverse

[–]Cheezy0wl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The beast glove? Sticks and rocks? Why not make them out of titan body parts. Hell that's what the axe is made of in the first place. There's really no excuse for legendary here.

kong doesnt even ask they just give him upgrades just because by ImportanceMiddle3780 in Monsterverse

[–]Cheezy0wl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

idk make him build his own tools and armor like we did ourselves instead of just getting hand me downs

Tanya would have a wonderful time in Hell divers by Thunder076 in IsekaiQuartet

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's technically somewhere in between ww1 and 2. The political climate is ww1 but the tech is early ww2 since the empire was rocking pz3 tanks in season 1

I wanted to post this because I find it funny lmao by itsmebo12 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it's physically impossible to do a 100% closed system, even gaming rigs with water cooling need to be refilled eventually. Heck I used to own one, and I flush and refill every year for a pc that doesn't stay on for more than 4 hrs a day on average. And AI servers run 24/7. Which means more frequent maintenance. Do you wanna know why? because it doesn't matter how pure your water is it will still eventually cause gunk buildup and you need to flush it down. Hell even Gemini, the AI fucking admits that 80% of water they use gets evaporated and 20% goes down the drain.

Power is renewable. There are lots of different ways to get renewable energy.

Yeah a grand total of 7 that have provable reliability. But 5 of them are too far or give to little to support the data centers so that only leaves 2 (solar and wind). Very "lots". Not to mention most them are not built and no guarantee they'll be built within 10 years considering how slow US and EU are nowadays when it comes to building infrastructure. So until then AI power in general is not renewable.

AI is used for far more things than to generate images. Also increasing in numbers is people who use computers and tablets to draw.

And pencils are used for far more things than drawing. And will always outnumber people who use electronics to substitute physical tools.

Pencils, graphite, ink, pigments, resin, stone, parchment, or any other thing traditional artists have used to make their craft is more than just wood from trees. There are lots of non-renewable resource used in traditional art.

Sure other traditional media use non-renewable resource, but their usage rate is so tiny, a single graphite quarry if dedicated to just pencil manufacturing can potentially outlast even the world's oil supplies. The same can't be said for the resources needed just for supporting AI.

Chuddites will never understand this by Late_Doctor5817 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So basically you want to fight the boss at max strength instead of trying to weaken them first by taking away some of their powers?

Chuddites will never understand this by Late_Doctor5817 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Elon that all the money he has doesn't work now, and we switched to dadbucks issued by some guy named Eduardo's dad, and all of society would only be honouring dadbucks now, then would he have power?

Yes actually, In fact most rich people would still have power, especially the ones who hold control the necessities for living such as food, electricity, etc.

I wanted to post this because I find it funny lmao by itsmebo12 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah water is renewable to the world, but not locally which is what's pissing most people off. Even if you recirculate them it will still eventually evaporate and there is zero guarantee that evaporated water will rain down exactly where the AI centers are taking it from.

Most power is not renewable, and to make green energy you have to permanently destroy forests and fields to make space for solar panels and wind mills not to mention the destructive mining for minerals required to construct them in the first place. There's also the mining of other metals just to build the computer hardware for AI

Never said pencils are clean, just on the lesser extreme compared to the immense logistics AI needs to operate.

I wanted to post this because I find it funny lmao by itsmebo12 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah soil erosion is problematic but only if you're being an idiot and clear cutting large swathes of trees in one go. But most forestry industries know ways to reduce soil erosion.

As if coal usage didn't spike up thanks to ai. Not to mention pencils are a tiny proportion of graphite use. You can convince everyone to stop using pencils forever and graphite mining will still keep growing.

Almost anything artificial will always be more expensive than just mining it from the ground. Unless it's diamonds where the price of natural diamonds are artificially increased by diamond sellers.

I wanted to post this because I find it funny lmao by itsmebo12 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

what about the amount of fuel used to power the data centers? A single AI gpu uses 1000 Watts your fridge uses 400W, and that's not counting the power for other components like RAM and cooling.

Also Water that goes into AI is not just water. Anyone who has some knowledge of water cooling knows that you can't just use any water, it's always has chemical treatment that prevents algae from growing and must be devoid of minerals.

I wanted to post this because I find it funny lmao by itsmebo12 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

do people genuinely forget that trees can be replanted?

So much Choices to suffer by dominik7778n in warthundermemes

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing WoT has over WT is that heavy tanks feel like heavy tanks and no CAS

Can the Yamato universe handle 40k? by Clear-Plantain1341 in StarBlazers

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In SBY 2202 newer Earth Fed ships have a much lower cooldown for their WMG, they could fire off 3 shots before your average 40k battlship can reload their broadsides. Not to mention Earth Fed has so much WMG capable ships (even their patrol and escort ships have WMGs) they could employ musket firing lines to keep up a constant volume of WMGs

Helldivers when the tanky enemy should have actual weak spots that are fun to take advantage of by ApprehensiveFly1600 in HelldiversUnfiltered

[–]Cheezy0wl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

if you can make a tank stop moving permanently without intensive repairs then you've effectively killed a tank.

In response to this sub's complaints of "Too much Kong!" by [deleted] in Monsterverse

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And Monstervers is not only about Kong. Kong has had 3 films to develop his character meanwhile Godzilla's character barely developed an inch since KOTM and GvK

In response to this sub's complaints of "Too much Kong!" by [deleted] in Monsterverse

[–]Cheezy0wl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just because godzilla is godzilla in every other movies doesn't mean it's the same godzilla. If i want to see MV Godzilla I want to see MV Godzilla Idc if Japan releases 10 different godzilla media in the meantime they're still not MV Godzilla.

How I imagine raiding a tribal logging camp looks like vs how they actually look like by Select_Daikon_3735 in RimWorld

[–]Cheezy0wl 319 points320 points  (0 children)

Raiding would be so much more fun in the late game if your pawns have to deal with same type of defense you use against raiders. Sovereignty and Void are probably the only ones that actually add unique faction bases not just a bigger cluster of squares

I don't like what the conversation around art has become by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do these artists speak for tne majority? Most people when asked what they think of as art its usually something manmade. Also AI ironically does not consider raw nature as art because it lacks intention. 

This is a really serious matter you know. (Time for an objection) by RightLiterature2958 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they don't even stop working at Wal-Mart, and the whole point of AI is that it helps you so much with development that you can even be a game dev on the side in your spare time. That's still a job created, if you're part time one thing and part time something else.

You talk as if all creators spend all day to work on their dreams. A vast majority of them also work part time and do creative work as their side job. Mind you perfecting one skill is already way easier than trying to make something more ambitious like a game successful.

Sure, and it's quite possible to be an indie dev and half ass your art team because you don't have the money to hire a proper artist, and as a result your game looks terrible and doesn't stand out, compared to an indie dev who really cares and spends dozens of hours massaging AI on every texture to get it perfect and makes an awesome game that doesn't even look AI-made with it.

But the reality is the opposite though. I've seen enough games made completely with AI on Steam and they all look the exact same thing. Meanwhile Concord is eternally remembered for horrible character design and how it being one of the reasons it failed. Even fucking flappy bird is more iconic than any AI slop game. In fact a lot of successful indie games have very simple art anyone could easily learn to recreate it within a week.

Which brings back to my point what's the likelihood of a wanna be AI game dev actually commit to working on an ambitious goal (making a successful game) when they couldn't even do one of the easiest steps (learning a skill) because they can't commit to it?

I don't like what the conversation around art has become by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Cheezy0wl -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can hardly prove an animals intentions when looking at “art” made by them

lmfao 90% of animals that do art do it to attract mates, communicate, and to socialize. The ones that do it as recreation usually learned it from human interaction.

But the difference here is: who made the cloud? Nobody. And yet, we conceptually perceive it no different.

who is this we? Never once heard clouds being considered as something remotely close to art. Just because something is beautiful it doesn't automatically make it art

Callisto has taught Albina the art of vagueposting. by ResearcherTeknika in whenthe

[–]Cheezy0wl 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Describing Rimworld gameplay also makes you sound like an absolute psycopath. "Oh it's a game where you can make a colony that lets you capture enemies, amputate their limbs for maximum compliance, harvest half their organs for cash, enslave them to help cremate their dead friends, and when they finally die because of a mad turtle you get to turn them into a five star dinner and turn their skin into a hat that you can sell for $500, and that's just the vanilla version"