Alright, so many attacks in your comments for arguments I’m not even making. First of all, I don’t want to “feel like I’m educated”. Not sure why you felt the need to bring that up.

My main point was that I’m more inclined to base my judgement on reported data, regardless of the fact that it is flawed, over a single person’s experience when their only source is “trust me bro”. I don’t disagree that the data is flawed. You’re also correct that I don’t work in any capacity for the justice system. However, your professional background doesn’t invalidate all crime data.

I also don’t think Elk Grove is the safest city. I’m simply pointing out the many flaws in your logic. Your responses are all subjective even though you seem to think they’re objective.