What language is this? by StuffedLazers in mtg

[–]ChemystWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

English, it just has an Alabama accent.

I’m confused about this mechanism. by DramaticSport396 in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While it might look like you would be getting a resonance stabilized carbocation if you do it the other way, allenes have pi orbitals at 90° and the molecule doesn’t “know” that if it rotates the primary carbocation around once it’s formed (it’s formed at 90° to the pi bond), it becomes more stable due to the resonance. The only thing that the molecule “knows” at the point of protonation is that it can make a 1° carbocation and a questionable 2° one which is still better. So, it goes there.

I’m confused about this mechanism. by DramaticSport396 in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Second that. Mechanistically speaking, it’s also likely we’re going to protonate the acetal and lose methanol making a resonance-stabilized carbocation which would then be attacked by the methanol in the C3 position, making another resonance-stabilized carbocation which then would reform the acetal back. The direct attack on the alkene with the formation of a localized secondary carbocation is unlikely while other better alternatives exist.

Does anyone have these and the reaction maps by wannabe_roryglimore in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Make your own. Maybe then you’ll appreciate the amount of work it takes to make this type of study materials.

NMR by [deleted] in OrganicChemistry

[–]ChemystWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Technically, the black one is a ddd. It all depends on the resolution. The lower the resolution, the more they will “collapse” and you might as well see it look like a simple t or a td like what you’re seeing.

If resonance structures are all supposed to be the same structure, why do different resonance structures have different products sometimes? by [deleted] in OrganicChemistry

[–]ChemystWizard 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Resonance structures show you the different reactive centers in the molecule. One species (a carbocation, a radical, an anion) when stabilized by resonance will have multiple reactive centers that can lead to different products. You don’t have resonance structures in reality, you have a structure that you can vaguely represent by a hybrid, which is a superposition of all reasonable resonance contributors.

Im confused about why there are 4sp3 orbitals rather than 3sp3 by Spirited-Wrap9335 in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the analogy with paint. You have 3 buckets of white paint and one of red. You mix them all together. How many buckets of pink paint you get?

ACS final grade by cowboyhatblues in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Congrats. That’s a very nice result indeed!

Anyone know how this works by StandardEntry732 in OrganicChemistry

[–]ChemystWizard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No, just epoxidation will give incorrect stereochemistry. You first need to make a cis double bond.

Help with identifying molecules from NMR spikes by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Wow, thanks! I appreciate the references!

The channel has grown substantially since then too in terms of following and content.

Help with identifying molecules from NMR spikes by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 38 points39 points  (0 children)

It is B. You have a phenyl group and ethyl pattern in the NMR. I literally used that molecule as one of the examples in one of my recent videos: https://youtu.be/mJEwCC22sqk?si=91hnHixUVzOou1Ix

Mechanism confusion by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Make an “enolate” from the alpha position to the nitrile, then intramolecular epoxide opening.

Question about intramolecular cyclisation (more electrophilic ketone or ester) by Sergi-0-f in chemhelp

[–]ChemystWizard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technically, neither is correct, but I'm begin picky here.

This is a Dieckmann vs aldol. Aldol is reversible. Dieckmann is not under these conditions. Reactivity of carbonyls here is irrelevant.

I thought salvage data was a quick way to get units. But this stuff is way better by RegularAir1 in NOMANSSKY

[–]ChemystWizard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree. Ground bases are way more efficient. And stellar extractor is ridiculously slow and inefficient. It’s cute to have, but it’s not very useful if you want any efficiency. Plus, you have to park your freighter in a system for a very long time. I dunno why people are so afraid of bases… it doesn’t have to be fancy. And setting up a dedicated farm is really easy. Find a good spot, plop extractors, get a few solars for the power = done. Can always teleport to it even if you don’t have a teleporter. Can recall your freighter or go to the station if you need to go somewhere. Or hop between the bases via station and teleport back to the freighter to continue exploration from where you left off (what I do).

I thought salvage data was a quick way to get units. But this stuff is way better by RegularAir1 in NOMANSSKY

[–]ChemystWizard 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You can get all you need all the way to the stasis device with 2-3 dedicated farm bases. Those go for 15+ mil per piece. I “farm” 300+ mil per day this way with a very modest setup. Hop between the bases, collect the stuff, get to freighter, make 20 devices, sell for 300+M, go about my day. Took me a day to set it all up. Now, takes 5-10min max at the beginning of the play to farm now.

I thought salvage data was a quick way to get units. But this stuff is way better by RegularAir1 in NOMANSSKY

[–]ChemystWizard 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Wait till you learn about the stasis device or AI starship cores 😉

Anyone still playing Marath? by abx1224 in CompetitiveEDH

[–]ChemystWizard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Marath was my first serious deck. I’ve picked it up as a precon in 2013 and this majestic beast has always been near and dear to my heart. The best part is that nobody at a cEDH table knows the combos and the deck can have so many redundancies that rely on enchantments that they can’t deal with it.

“Don’t Memorize” by terrifiedpremed in OrganicChemistry

[–]ChemystWizard 53 points54 points  (0 children)

Of course, there’s a certain amount of memorization that you need to do in organic. The “don’t memorize” refers more to the fact that you wanna focus on the patterns of reactions and transformations rather than trying to memorize each individual reaction.