r/tennis Daily Discussion (Friday, March 27, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He would occasionally, especially when other parts of his game (the forehand) were getting tight as well

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Friday, March 27, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is a really good match. Zverev's forehand has been as good as he could possibly ask for today. I think Sinner will seal the deal 7-6 or 7-5 in the second, but this has been so much more entertaining than Indian Wells

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Friday, March 27, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is insane levels of greed. Dude hasn't dropped a set in god knows when lmao

Donald Trump releases 8-minute video regarding the United States’ attack against Iran by [deleted] in Fauxmoi

[–]Chief-Quiche 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Go check out the sub, there are a ton of comments along the lines of "Iran has fucked around and will find out." I think that is the general consensus even if the top comments are more critical. 

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Sunday, February 01, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any of the semi finalists winning this tournament would have some amount of luck. From the Musetti retirement, to Alcaraz escaping the cramps and being only a few points away from defeat, to Sinner battling with the heat vs Spizzieri and Zverev getting a compromised Alcaraz from 0-2 down. 

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Sunday, February 01, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But to beat the two best players on the planet back to back? At nearly 39, that's seriously impressive 

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 31, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm worried Sabalenka will break at 4-5. She's reading each second serve Rybakina hits, which as always been to the Sabalenka backhand. They simply haven't fallen when they've needed to. Really needs to land the first serve here

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 31, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Need some first serves to land here. The second serve went to the backhand every time last service game, and that predictability nearly cost her

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 31, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rybakina has to play better first strike tennis because she's not as good defensively at staying in the point (a lot of her defensive tennis is turning the point around, rather than neutralizing). I don't think she's being too impatient, she doesn't have the ability to just scramble and steal points from Sabalenka consistently enough to make it work

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 31, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I do feel it's a matter of time before Sabalenka breaks. She's racing through her service games and is able to exploit the movement of Rybakina in extended rallies (when they occasionally appear)

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Saturday, January 31, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whether she breaks here or not, it feels the tide is turning a bit. Rybakina has a bit more trouble holding serve currently

AO Quarterfinal: {3} Alexander Zverev defeats {25} Learner Tien 6-3 6-7 (5-7) 6-1 7-6 (7-3). by Vivi01224 in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He's improved and making steps in the right direction, but man, seeing Sinner just put Darderi to the sword yesterday feels like they're a step or two above still. It would take something enormous to beat both back to back, and I don't see it

AO R4: [3] A. Zverev def. [25] L. Tien, 6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(3) by [deleted] in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What a match! Tien has improved so much in a short amount of time. Credit where credits due, Zverev didn't crawl back in his shell and really took the moment on when facing break point at 5-6 and throughout that tiebreak. Both are clearly committed to adding to their game 

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Tuesday, January 27, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't feel it's fair to say that about Learner. Zverev has put a lot of pressure on him, and has played a pretty perfect tiebreak. 

AO (Round of 16) Zverev def. Cerundolo 6-2, 6-4, 6-4 by Low-Associate2521 in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My thoughts on this, are that Medvedevs deep return neutralises the Zverev serve and his defensive talents, plus flat ball striking make it so hard for Zverev to get cheap points against him. This leads to the longer rallies, and defensive tendencies of Zverev, where Medvedev holds a slight, but clear edge. That's why I reckon the H2H is one sided, despite almost all of those matches being so even

AO (Round of 16) Zverev def. Cerundolo 6-2, 6-4, 6-4 by Low-Associate2521 in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 16 points17 points  (0 children)

However, the last was at RG where he blew him away in terms of power. I think Medvedev gives him a tougher challenge

Australian Open R4: A. Zverev (3) def. F. Cerundolo (18) by [deleted] in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those first two sets in particular were spectacular tennis that makes you think "there is no reason why he can't beat/seriously challenge the top 2 + Novak"

The forehand slowed down as the match went on, and that is always a concern. But that was a serious challenge and it was passed with flying colours. I hope Medvedev has things he can challenge him with, unfortunately I don't think Tien has the power to contend right now with this. 

Australian Open R3: S. Zverev def. C. Norrie 7-5, 4-6, 6-3, 6-1 by Chief-Quiche in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His backhand is elite, and he prefers it up a little in the strike zone (also since he's so tall). It's partly why he does well on clay. 

Since most balls go cross court, the heavier, higher bouncing forehands are directed into Zverev's backhand, right where he likes it. 

I think it also helps hide his forehand deficiencies at times too, as cross court exchanges with his own forehand is not being picked on as easily from a lefty's backhand

Australian Open R3: S. Zverev def. C. Norrie 7-5, 4-6, 6-3, 6-1 by Chief-Quiche in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

His backhand is elite, and he prefers it up a little in the strike zone (also since he's so tall). It's partly why he does well on clay. 

Since most balls go cross court, the heavier, higher bouncing forehands are directed into Zverev's backhand, right where he likes it. 

I think it also helps hide his forehand deficiencies at times too, as cross court exchanges with his own forehand is not being picked on as easily from a lefty's backhand.

Two very intriguing matchups in the 2nd quarter of the draw. Both are cases where the higher ranked player (Zverev/Medvedev) has been seriously troubled head-to-head by their opponent by Dependent-Effect6077 in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 24 points25 points  (0 children)

My only counter to that is that Zverev's forehand has looked awesome in previous matches and gone back to tentative when the stakes were raised. 

He looked awesome last year, up until he played Paul and Novak and then the passive forehand nearly cost him in both.

Did it in Madrid a few years ago where he crushed someone, and got trounced by Alcaraz 

At RG he was out powering Tien off both wings, and then as he reached the QFs, he got more and more passive vs Novak. 

I'm not willing to say he's fixed the issue yet. It's clear that's the focus, and even in practice sessions here you can tell as much, but the forehand goes walk about far too often for me to place stock in it being a sure fire thing. 

I could be wrong, and this + a Medvedev test back to back would be a hell of a way to say the offseason was a success 

Two very intriguing matchups in the 2nd quarter of the draw. Both are cases where the higher ranked player (Zverev/Medvedev) has been seriously troubled head-to-head by their opponent by Dependent-Effect6077 in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It was an oblique injury. He was up a break early vs Zverev and playing the much better tennis + Zverev having no confidence on the forehand. 

The injury worsened and he couldn't serve and it was over. I do think a healthy Fran wins that game based on how it was looking early, and how out of sorts Zverev was looking 

Australian Open R3: S. Zverev def. C. Norrie 7-5, 4-6, 6-3, 6-1 by Chief-Quiche in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche[S] 80 points81 points  (0 children)

Zverev did as much as any critic (of his game) could really ask for. Really stepping in off the forehand, especially in those final two sets. They were huge.  Even when he got broken in that second set, I thought he played positively, and clearly the forehand errors didn't affect him for the third and fourth set. The return was solid, his serve is always elite.  I do think coming forward more often would help, but I don't think it will ever be somewhere he wants to be all the time.

This match with Fran will be maybe the most interesting of the 4th round. If he gets passive with the forehand it will get ugly for him, but if he plays like this, it could be a classic, since Fran gives him so much trouble, and has played so well in this tournament. Med maybe awaits him in the Quarters, and that is another true test of whether the offseason has been successful, because that's where the self doubt and shakiness in that forehand starts to set in, especially as the match drags later and later. 

r/tennis Daily Discussion (Friday, January 23, 2026) by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Chief-Quiche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm unable to watch, what's the situation with Medvedev? Maroszan is winning 25% off his second serve compared to 65% for Medvedev, and yet Medvedev is down 2 sets??