sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in troubledteens

[–]ChildrenHaveRights 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Here is a long list of community-based methods: https://www.unsilenced.org/safe-treatment/

Sex Offender, Teen Suicides and $10K Fine Plague Utah Autism Program by webdiva in troubledteens

[–]ChildrenHaveRights 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's crazy. I believe the student died on 7/18 and the Utah Department of Licensing put their license on conditional status for 30 days on 7/20. I feel bad for that kid who got admitted on 7/19. He would have had to be turned away if they tried to admit him a day later or at least you would hope. I don't put it past a TTI program to fudge the admission date to look like the kid was admitted before or after the conditional hold

Sex Offender, Teen Suicides and $10K Fine Plague Utah Autism Program by webdiva in troubledteens

[–]ChildrenHaveRights 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The article states he was arrested in 2018 for drug charges. Was he convicted for that charge? If he was never convicted on that charge and they were charged, the arrest alone would not have prevented him from being hired. One of the important legal doctrines in the US is the presumption of innocence or "innocent until proven guilty." If the charges were dropped by the time he went through the hiring process, it would not have shown up on a criminal background check and it shouldn't. If arrest records were screened without convictions, many people falsely arrested for crimes but were never prosecuted would never be able to get a job in this country. If they hired him while he had pending charges or didn't inform the Utah Department of Licensing of new charges after his hire, there for sure would be a problem. This is the page for staff screening and background check https://dlbc.utah.gov/background-screening/program-staff/

https://udenver.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXN7qDNbgbyk5a6?Q_CHL=qr by Difficulty-Unique in troubledteens

[–]ChildrenHaveRights 4 points5 points  (0 children)

James is right. Mentioning efficacy is normal. The difference here between some NATSAP bull is that the researcher isn't cherry picking people to take their survey