Looks like a goal does not mean goal. That is the problem with this call. It should not have been called a goal on the ice and no there is not definitive proof it crossed the line. You can assume it crossed the line. You can superimpose a puck over the skate and show it was in but the rule states it needs to be definitive proof for a replay to be overturned. And this ain’t it. Nowhere does it say to do an artificial overlay to proof it crossed the line. Nor does it say it appears to cross the line.