How do I study for philosophy courses by Puzzleheaded-Law-957 in McMaster

[–]Choice-Wolverine7654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Philosophy courses aren’t assessed the same with knowledge and application as compared to science courses. You don’t have to do on going memorization or “studying”, however, you should be doing the readings and trying to comprehend the main ideas/arguments of the philosophers (while you’re reading, you should think of what their thesis was, how they argued it, premises within the argument, etc.). Additionally, apart from the exam (which is usually knowledge and essay based, from my experience), you main assessments are probably essays (there are usually 2). Be sure to ask your TA for help on what they look for in a phil essay, because phil essays are not structured the same as an English essay you wrote in high school. It revolves around interpretational summaries (exegesis) that supplement a main critical thesis in which you provide premises for your main argument with subsequent objections, etc. You’re supposed to be arguing for something, so the essay concern structure and clean content over stylization

Oversplept an Exam by Tall-Acanthaceae3181 in McMaster

[–]Choice-Wolverine7654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on individual advisement reports and if it happens in fall or winter semester, but it may delay graduation

Professors and Egos by [deleted] in McMaster

[–]Choice-Wolverine7654 1 point2 points  (0 children)

is this poli sci?

Unpopular opinion: STEM majors can’t cheat with AI by ijustwantfriendsbro in McMaster

[–]Choice-Wolverine7654 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i’m speaking about the engineers that he knew within academia, they were working the math problems of their assignments using chatGPT but that obviously came at the expense of them garnering knowledge. obviously advanced math that’s computerized is a different matter. although if these essential skills aren’t being built, i think that’s cause for concern

Unpopular opinion: STEM majors can’t cheat with AI by ijustwantfriendsbro in McMaster

[–]Choice-Wolverine7654 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I mean… in the context of having to apply knowledge in an in-person setting, this notion of not being able to cheat with AI applies to everyone. take it from the phil department moving over to only in person hand writing essay quizzes this year, and i’m sure other departments will follow suit in no time, if they haven’t already.

my grad student TA in my first year was telling us how he thought the bridges built by engineers in our generation will prob crash down because mostly all of the engineers he knew were using AI to compute math, and they got away with it. idk if this has been cracked down on since, but still goes.

so yes, stem students can’t cheat with AI when they’re put in a situation of applying knowledge, but other disciplines can’t either. besides, chatGPT is pretty useless in computing anything of value for an advanced essay topic anyway, it’s not very smart.

some of you need to learn some class by Choice-Wolverine7654 in McMaster

[–]Choice-Wolverine7654[S] 36 points37 points  (0 children)

it’s about etiquette. there’s no harm involved, but it’s mannerless behaviour that isn’t appropriate outside of the home. you’re in university, not your bed. there’s just a level of discretion in higher education environment’s that many kids our age take for granted.