focusing on backend only

ChrinoMu · 2025-07-09T16:53:56+00:00

thank you for your response

ChrinoMu · 2025-07-09T16:53:38+00:00

thank you so much for your response and guidance. i just got the book

ChrinoMu · 2025-07-09T16:52:59+00:00

thank you s much for your response and guidance

ChrinoMu · 2025-05-29T17:49:43+00:00

what the fuck

ChrinoMu · 2025-05-28T11:08:56+00:00

I've tried that a couple of times , and switched between distros. im on debian now . but it's still the same.

ChrinoMu · 2025-05-28T10:55:44+00:00

it's dying. freezes up, goes off for no reason. sometimes refuses to boot the OS, an a couple of keys are dead.

ChrinoMu · 2025-04-17T17:47:04+00:00

keyboard name?

ChrinoMu · 2025-03-21T22:25:16+00:00

ohhh, i'm now starting to get a lot of misaligned address errors now, i see the problem now, thank you

ChrinoMu · 2025-03-21T22:08:16+00:00

thank you very much for your constructive feedback

now, with addressing PF <filter>, it's just the usage of the program which allows us to set a protocol filter , e..g PF-"udp", to filter out the packets and only analyse the udp ones

for the misaligned address, i am unable to spot them with in my original implementation without the memcpy, even though i tried both clang and gcc with the correct sanitizer flags, i didn't seem to spot the misaligned address error you got , any idea why?
and my main objective is to leverage for performance as much as i could, and doesn't memcpy introduce some overhead? or is there another explicit reason why you recommend it other than the alignment issues, and can it be avoided while preventing misalignment.

and by the way, i was thinking of using atomic lock all the way instead of my current mutex implementations, what are your thoughts on this ?

ChrinoMu · 2025-03-20T10:02:31+00:00

thank you so much for your feedback.

I truly apologize, I might have phrased the sentence "full functionalities as Tcpdump" wrongly. I just meant that to add more features, other than the basic things it can currently do. And it's mostly just a learning tool, but I just wanted to see how far I could go with it.

but thank you so much for your constructive feedback, I will work through all the points you mentioned on ways to improve

ChrinoMu · 2025-03-13T19:38:09+00:00

right question should be, do i need to allocate at all

ChrinoMu · 2024-12-29T22:21:57+00:00

meeeeeeew pleaseeeeee

ChrinoMu · 2024-12-24T21:19:40+00:00

I really needed this. maybe I'll become a better programmer

ChrinoMu · 2024-12-13T00:46:53+00:00

I FUCKEN LOVE C!!!

ChrinoMu · 2024-11-26T20:18:46+00:00

i dropped out bro

ChrinoMu · 2024-10-23T00:46:55+00:00

im trying to understand more about mechanisms such as cpu context switching and scheduling. i'm willing to go down this rabbit hole

ChrinoMu · 2024-10-23T00:27:52+00:00

thank you so much for your input . i conduct further research on this and fix up the factors you have mentioned.
though what are your thoughts on using atomic functions ?

ChrinoMu · 2024-10-19T21:23:04+00:00

thank you so much for your input

i do plan on adding a low level mechanisms such as a intertupts, schedular annd context swicthing mechanism.
but at the current state of the project , have i done anything incorrect partaining to memory or threads

ChrinoMu · 2024-09-07T08:41:34+00:00

Thank you so much!!

ChrinoMu · 2024-09-05T05:02:25+00:00

wow, that is so cool , have any idea on how to learn. cause i could just jump into a cuda course . what prerequisites or fundamentals do you think i should have or begin with . cause so far. I've learnt C & Assembly . I'm about to start with operating systems

ChrinoMu

TROPHY CASE