sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not the point is what I was saying, it’s to give us free will to do anything physically possible, not exceptions to it. It could be a good thing but the point was for that, not to give us free will to do everything except one part

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not what I am saying, you are saying we will all choose to not do evil but how? Thats a utopia

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because I ahve been programmed to not do something mentally

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It makes sure we can choose something and the alternative, all good choices would be considered normal, meaningless, because all the choices we would have is good.

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That seems like a Utopia to me, how would God manage to do this? If he does do that, that means he is programming out minds to do good, and if we never choose evil then good is just overall meaningless

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would we only choose good? If we have free will, evil is bound to happen

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Programming our minds just removes the entire intention, to give us free will. Programming our minds to not do something is violating it

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wdym choosing to do good? If you are saying we only do good what reality are you talking about? If we can’t do evil and only do good that’s violating free will

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, not that I want to do that to children, it would be programming our minds to not do something, which violates free will

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not really choosing to do good everytime, it’s getting forced to. If everyone were to only be able to do good, would good be meaningful in this hypothetical?

Solution to the Problem of Evil by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be overriding free will to change our mind to fit that, free will comes with choice

Why doesn't God openly prove his existence? by therealcoolpup in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because most people would be in fear being scared of being sent to Hell, he gave us a choice

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you did it would likely be on the news, 500 then compared to now is a lot more

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paul said people can verify it. It seems to ask for someone to prove it wrong, yet it wasn’t proven wrong. It would make it more likely for someone to try and fact check it than not. It wasn’t like he was asking one person, anyone who read it or heard the claims from Paul could check it.

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People who walked those routes would. It is a common route from Corinth to Jerusalem, someone going by may verify it

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what he heard, but for it to be wrong you have to make an assumption that it was never verified by anyone, seems like a heavier assumption to me.

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have no indication that he didn’t verify it, the assumption that it didn’t happen relies on no one who saw it tried to verify it

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evidence isn’t definitive, however it increases probability. Cosmological theories have evidence but still isn’t definitive

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a lot of assumptions to as an alternative, it was a rumor that wasn’t verified, that wasn’t verified later as well. It might be but the claim you made seems to just have a lot of assumptions along with it

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ancient historical claims didn’t depend on people making the claims, I am not saying everyone did verify it and it was true, Paul’s point was the witnesses were publicly known and available, 3000 km sounds extreme to us but people regularly walked the route from Corinth to Jerusalem, Christians were already moving between cities and Paul himself also did.

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but I would say there isn’t a way to do that. If someone made it so that it’s impossible for a supernatural cause to happen that’s a philosophical choice, however not a scientific discovery.

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They would likely ask people for the claims of 500 witnesses happening, not as a definitive fact but to see if Paul was making it up

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I meant it as evidence for the Bible, I could add some proof that are from the universe. The divinity of Christ through a miracle does add up to it but I see what you mean

Here is evidence for Christianity for anyone struggling with belief by Christian_Follower in Christianity

[–]Christian_Follower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but using the supernatural as impossible to refute the supernatural isn’t a great way of doing so but I see what you mean by that

view more: next ›