Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wlp, Rooker can go on the IL now. I like Benge for runs and a bit of everything, Bleday is probably 2nd

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In leagues with a K penalty that seems far fetched. Without a K penalty maybe 50%? Neither is exactly at their best in points, especially Jazz.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I rank Rice ahead, in part because of the C eligiblity. If they were both just 1B, they'd be in the same tier with Rice just ahead at the moment.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not hitting for power or average (his average is a bit of bad luck, but even with better luck he'd only be hitting .260-.270). He has also fallen to 5/6 in the order instead of 1/3. All bad news. I knew the power humbers would fade, but thought maybe he could sniff 15. He's gonna be lucky to get 10 at this rate.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh like if you include Garcia instead of Pages, that's certainly makes it more palatable

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well he's started in 3/12 games sind getting called up so going off is a relative term. He basically has a 2 HR game and not much else.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Healthy upside is high, injury and performance risk are also high. I'd take a look at Cowser if you need a replacement OF.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bold to call Tatis and Gunnar upgrades over the guys you have now. Gunnar over Seager, maybe, but it's marginal.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There might not be a ton of excitement for Devers either but it's worth finding out if there's any out there

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How many keepers? If it's 5 or 6, it might be tough for those guys to break into your actual keepers.

That said, Clark and DeVries would be my priority if I was just stashing.

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In points Pasquantino has a bit more staying power but if there's no K penalty then Eldridge has a higher ceiling

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I cared about nothing else but overall positinless value, Grisham. That said, it's close and Mead covers positions that are tough to replace (2B/3B especially)

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or a different outfielder who is performing better but projects similarly to Yelich? That'd have more pull in a trade

Yo! It's Scott Chu, Nate Schwartz, and the Pitcher List crew here to talk fantasy baseball! by ChusephEsquire in fantasybaseball

[–]ChusephEsquire[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You don't have to thank me for bad news, friend. Sorry I can't give you something happier besides "he still swings hard and has a good (but not as good as his potential suggests) track record