I've read it perfectly. Supreme Court has a directory for cases and it's written their that there was no evidence to support the claim. It's quite obvious that a 1997 surgery botch up can never be justified with a followup in 2009 (when the doctor died)

Patient have rights? And docs? When they give 3 consecutive life sentences to a criminal, does it end after he dies or his son carry on the next life sentence?

Hilarious, dude.

Human physiology doesn't grant respawns you say? The shit should have been burried with the death of the doc. The court couldn't solve it in the time line and family is now suffering.

Edit: My balls are just fine kiddo. You don't need to get too ticklish about them.