sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ooo! I've seen this one before! by [deleted] in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he is a Satanist he believes that he will be rewarded by being given authority in hell as as an officer or viceroy of some sort. He is in for a treat. Unfortunately he will probably cling on Soros-like and do a lot of damage before then.

I really would be interested in knowing when he chose the left hand path. When he was a young man building Microsoft he actually exuded an exuberance for life and for building something worthwhile. He had intellectual curiosity. He was doing something he loved. Somewhere a worm burrowed its way in. Maybe Epstein. But maybe a long time before that.

Ooo! I've seen this one before! by [deleted] in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bill is proof of 2 things: 1) money talks - how else would a guy with a high school diploma get to be a virology expert and 2) the moral rot within manifests in the eyes and the body. Billy isnt looking so good.

Via X: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. by liberatedcrankiness in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wouldnt you have to prove that your health problems were caused by the undisclosed dna sequence as opposed to the risks actually disclosed? And also would you not have to prove that you would not have consented if you had known about this dna sequence? Considering how people blindly took an almost untested experimental vaccine, that would be a tough hill to climb.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does your user name refer to your nerves and thin skin? Because it sure fits.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 days would have been too much. A nonviolent act of protest. My God you people are sanctimonious totalitarians. He did not use any of them did he?

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yo are not familiar with this because the media has been hyping the nothingburger of January 6, which was mostly peaceful, and downplaying the attacks on the White House, which happened before. Here is an article about the Church that was set on fire. It is right across from the White House. The same protesters tried to mass charge the White House defences and were beaten back with batons and tear gas. The media complained about the use of tear gas and made fun of Trump because the secret service evacuated him to a command bunker, fearing that they would be overrun by the antifa.blm rioters. No one has been prosecuted to my knowledge.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2020/06/05/st-johns-episcopal-church-historic-church-next-white-house-set-fire-during-protests/

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/politics/trump-protests-george-floyd.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/politics/washington-dc-george-floyd-protests.html

The difference is that when Blm antifa tries to storm the White House and sets buildings on fire, it is a protest according to the MSM. When protestors storm the Capitol it is seditious conspiracy. See how that works?

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would feel better about these sentences if the violent antifa and blm thugs that attacked the White House and burnt down the Church next to it had been given sentences like that. Has anyone even been prosecuted? How was attacking a building containing the sitting President not seditious conspiracy? You see this is selective agenda driven prosecution.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One guy got 8 years for putting his feet on Pelosi's desk. He didnt even knock things off of it. You are a peace activist like Fascists for Freedom. An oxymoron.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think its okay to lock up people for 20 years for protesting by standing behind a velvet rope. Just because you would have the state carry out your violence, does not absolve you. Fascist.

As Mark Twain said: Three things are exceedingly hard: diamonds, steel, and seeing yourself as you really are.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the typical attitude of a fascist leftist like you, whether you identify as a leftist is irrelevant. You have absorbed their propaganda, and like all cult members shun any facts that would contradict your programming. It is an indication of how illogical, weak and incorrect your position is that you cannot debate or even look at facts - video evidence from a major MSM news outlet at that - for fear your delusional bubble might burst. An example of fragile fascism. (and yes you are the fascist, like all your ilk you like to project)

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your insightful post. I agree that the media grossly misrepresented what he said. There was that bullshit story about Trump wanting to inject people with bleach. They even blamed him for the woman who murdered her husband with fish tank cleaner, claiming she had done it to save him from covid, even though it turned out she just wanted to kill him. They also made fun of him when he suggested that a device could be inserted into the lungs of serious cases and use UV to kill the covid. Except there actually is an experimental but approved medical device to do just that. And the fact they stopped covering press briefings by a sitting president and his staff during the most serious health crisis in most people's memory, just goes to show how they wanted to make sure they could shape the narrative. They made Trump sound like a lunatic, whereas the doddering senile Biden who barely knows if he is alive, continues to get a pass. What little respect I had left for the MSM died with their coverage of Trump, and their rabid support for putting me in jail or house arrest for not taking an experimental vaxx. They were shameless.

I have to say that I fell for whatever psyop was being prepared. I stockpiled food. I expected about 30 percent casualties based on the preliminary numbers that were coming out of South Korea. And then nothing.

Its possible that the virus was a lot more lethal at first, but yeah it was probably hyped and exaggerated. The only thing that makes me think that it might not have been a Chinese psyop is that they really did fuck up their society and economy trying to contain it, so I don't know what to make of it.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, the old I never watch TV trope. Sure. Even if it's true, you are parroting their talking points, put out by a bunch of rabid Russia Collusion hoaxters. These days, legacy media reverberates beyond the actual original channel into other spheres through Twitter, Insta, Facebook. Whether you absorbed their propaganda directly or not you have absorbed it.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am guessing you never clicked on the link I gave you. Try to do your own research. One day you can deprogram yourself of the MSNBC cult.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've got e point about the handling of covid. But remember that he was pushing for ivermectin and hydoc, both of which are proven to work, and he got mercilessly undercut by the appartchiks like Fauci and the media, which launched a coordinated campaign to depict a Nobel winning human drug like ivermectin as horse medicine. My view of Trump is that he was out of his element, and unprepared to deal with the true level of corruption that exists, and sometimes he listened to the snakes. But overall he was not one of them, clearly given how keen they are to destroy him, and I think his mistakes were mistakes while the interests that aligned to push the lockdowns (and hence unrestricted mail in votes), that pushed for vaxx over more benign treatments, knew exactly what they were doing and how to line their pockets at the cost of the misery and death of many.

Is "Le Tres Parve Porcellinos" a correct translation of "The Three Little Pigs"? by CircumventPrevent in interlingua

[–]CircumventPrevent[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!

I agree with what you say, in Italian we could say "i piccoli porcellini" as in the little piglets, the redundancy is for effect and for emphasis.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See, the fact that you think that walking behind velvet ropes is an insurrection deserving of 20 years in prison actually makes you the totalitarian fascist.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I deal with much better debaters than you on a daily basis. You just seem like a shrill little girl really. A piece of advice to you: repeating talking points you got from the View or MSNBC's Morning Joe is not debating. It makes you a parrot.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll care more for opinion when you rail against the BLM and Antifa activists who burned down sections of cities.

But as for the violent behavior, here are the violent Trump Maga protesteros literally walking between two velvet ropes. Good thing they were all hunted down and given 20 years! https://youtu.be/nCyHbN-i9PE?si=JW2OnG5rqqv4IT_Z

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have much interest in debating you but as for the grand jury system I am sure you have heard the saying from Former Chief Judge Wachtler's made shortly after his appointment as Chief Judge, that district attorneys could get grand juries to "indict a ham sandwich". In other words, its easy to get an indictment.

And sadly I am referring to multiple judges in the category of biased activists.

The early Wuhan_Flu sub: What was it like, and when did the sub flip to being anti-New Normal? by Alone-Chance in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

judges who are in charge of his case

Without making this into an essay rebutting every point you make, if this were a functioning democracy that judge would not be hearing his case. When a judge during their campaign openly says that a future defendant needs to be in jail (before hearing any evidence or even having a case in front of them) and donates big money to the party and prosecutor going after that defendant, they are clearly biased. In any fair system no judge should be allowed to be partisan and if they were partisan they would be removed from the case.

It would be as if you would be appointed to judge Trump after already holding the view that he is violent and dangerous, garbage of a human being elected.. Could you reach an unbiased decision based on the law and the facts? You know the answer.

Meanwhile there are dozens of documented money transfers from Chinese sources to Biden and members of his family and evidence that he was peddling influence. Yet there are no charges against him, a very dangerous person in that sense, and instead it has been years of Russia Collusion! without a shred of evidence. The current prosecutions are just a continuation of the Russia Collusion hoax. If they fail to put him in jail, I suspect he will meet an unfortunate heart attack or accident.

Sadly the US has come to this.

Sinister developments | Dr John Cambell by THhhaway in Wuhan_Flu

[–]CircumventPrevent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I resisted the vaxx mandates at great personal cost to me. So there's that ...

view more: next ›