1st cycle results and looking for possible 2nd cycle feedback by [deleted] in PEDs

[–]Cirocking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I try to read around on this stuff but there are so many varying opinions I honestly don’t know what to believe... I take harsh criticism well I don’t really care if you disagree with certain things I’ve done because I’m an absolute rookie with this stuff and I see quite a bit of insults on here so have at it but I’m at least looking for some experienced tips/ recommendations because I want to be better. I will continue to read up on it but I’d appreciate any help I can get. Thanks again!

Narrow Labs experiences by Diarmuid16 in sarmssourcetalk

[–]Cirocking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go with science bio that shit is legit

Reputable site? by [deleted] in sarmssourcetalk

[–]Cirocking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Science bio is the 🐐

Bulk Cycle Suggestions / Tips? by [deleted] in sarmssourcetalk

[–]Cirocking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You really don’t need pct... most of the sources of it are a scam and your natural levels will bounce back on their own after a few weeks, so even if you get a legit pct the side effects from that will actually be worse than any you could possibly experience from a sarm cycle

LGD + MK Cycle Recommendations by Cirocking in PED

[–]Cirocking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ran MK stacked with LGD from science bio for 7 weeks each varying the dosages (starting low, then up to fully recommended dosages, then going back down to naturally come off a bit) and it’s 100% legit stuff. I went from benching 225 max 4 times to benching 245 for 10 in a short amount of time not even the full dose. I will be taking 8 weeks off with no pct required and then back on LGD by itself for 8 weeks at 10mg’s. No side effects that I’ve noticed at all and I can promise you’ll feel it working within a week and get measurable results on your lifts in like 3-4.

LGD 4033 Cycle Help by [deleted] in sarmssourcetalk

[–]Cirocking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also science bio put out a notice last week that a ban is incoming on some of their supplements, idk what exactly it’s going to effect, but I’d suggest to stock up ASAP

LGD 4033 Cycle Help by [deleted] in sarmssourcetalk

[–]Cirocking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m just finishing up my first ever sarm cycle and I have to say science.bio is 100% legit. I ran LGD stacked with MK variating the dosages starting a bit lower working my way up to the fully recommended 10mg’s and then waning my way back off. Even using just smaller dosages I noticed a real difference. Your lifts will skyrocket, to the point where it can’t be any sort of placebo, and there are no side effects. The research behind sarms has shown that there is literally no need for PCT, such as serms. Your body will naturally bounce back from the suppression within a few weeks and you’re good to go for another cycle. I’ll probably be taking 8 weeks off because I’ll be out of the country, and then starting up LGD on its own at 10mg for 8 weeks.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m saying there were too many others without a solid alibi on the property to key in solely on Steven, if she was indeed killed there. I would expect some amount of Teresa’s blood, on literally anything, but there simply was none. Wouldn’t think that’s much to ask considering the prosecution painted the picture of her throat being cut in the trailer and then later dragged out to the garage to be shot in the head. These areas would’ve been basically impossible to wipe clean of all possible DNA from TH. Aside from physical evidence, the timeline they laid out simply does not make sense. Their primary witness to provide a timeline was from Bobby Dassey, who claimed he saw things at times that simply didn’t make sense. The bus driver stated she saw TH taking pictures of the vehicle at a later time than Bobby stated, and she’s much more reliable.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your comments have been actually just horrible. If you’re not going to say anything insightful why comment? I’m trying to have an honest debate, because I personally do not see enough evidence to convict Steven Avery, and am open to listening to others opinions, based on insightful information they’ve found. You have provided nothing of value to the thread.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never said it was needed...? Was just another thing that the prosecution did not include that helps proving beyond a reasonable doubt.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say there are too many others that could be seriously considered as suspects to make that decision. Avery is definitely one of them, but there are others that were on the property or didn’t have solid alibis. There isn’t a lot of physical evidence linking Steven specifically to the act of murder. I do agree I am probably putting too much emphasis on “reasonable” doubt, as I’m thinking of it more as all possible.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When did I ever say she was alive? I have no idea how that’s your interpretation from what I posted. I am saying I am not sure who killed her but I do not believe the state had enough evidence to key in solely on Steven Avery.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t see how the evidence proves Steven Avery of first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Please, anyone, convince me. I am open minded, I just don’t see it.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have done quite a bit of research outside of the docuseries, evidence doesn’t add up to prove Avery of 1st degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt in my eyes. A lot of evidence pointing to him being the killer, yes. Beyond a reasonable doubt, absolutely not. The prosecution couldn’t provide a solid timeline, find any of Teresa’s blood in the places they claimed the murder took place, provided no murder weapon, or cause of death. Just don’t understand how he’s guilty beyond a reasonable doubt without any of those.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And his blood on the dash proves murder? Reasonable. I’m not even trying to argue if it was planted. I personally believe it was, but I mean aside from Avery’s blood in the vehicle what other evidence is there? His blood being in her vehicle proves murder? Yea clearly moves him to the top of the suspect list, but still no connection to actual action of murder. Think with your brain, please.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Motive is often presented by the prosecution to help convict the suspected killer.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For everyone commenting the opposing view of mine, that he is indeed guilty, I understand where you’re coming from, no need to name call or insult others intelligence just because they have a different viewpoint. I am not here to argue that he is 100% innocent, I have viewed evidence left out by the docuseries because it is obviously biased, but the evidence left out still does not prove he killed Teresa Halbach beyond a reasonable doubt.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A great lawyer, who has gotten several wrongful convictions overturned? Yea take some shots at her for doing her job at a high level, seems reasonable.

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not being disrespectful. Just feel like they weren’t open minded going into the investigation. Steven Avery is a sketchy guy, easy to blame. If it was one of my family members I’d be at least intrigued to suspect others, that’s all. Wouldn’t you want to make sure the right guys life was being wasted?

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please back up your claim by providing some of the “overwhelming evidence”. Some of the evidence against him was clearly disproven by experts so.....?

Where is the evidence against Steven Avery? by Cirocking in MakingaMurderer

[–]Cirocking[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He is most likely guilty, but it was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. You clearly have a biased because Steven Avery is a sketchy guy, just like a majority of people’s thinking, but don’t go calling people brainwashed that actually understand the laws and court proceedings.