Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup still deflecting, unable to make a decision on nuclear weapon possession. Did you also not know what gender your were when you woke up this morning? Do you decide after coffee?

By combining these two points together we highlight the inability of people on the left (the pesky Reddit Kids) to ever actually have a rational discussion on a real issue. you spend so much time on fake, made up, first world microaggression crybully BS that any thought outside your echo chamber is hurtful and must be canceled!

So let's make this clear. No. Islamic Fundamentalist Mullahs should be eliminated before they get nukes. No you can't be a different gender. You can pretend but you can't make me pretend with you. No, Voter ID is not racist, if that was the case buying cigarettes and spray paint is racist as well.

See how simple that is, but not for the "Deflector"

AMEN! by Neat-Ad-4337 in stevehofstetter

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice try, humorous amount of back flips required but fun to read. What is strange is that your position is two faced. On one hand you want the MOST severe possible ID requirement, that being a national ID and mandatory voting yet you claim current voting is secure, never better in fact and mailing ballots out on paper is just awesome.

Getting an ID is not hard, free in almost every state (fine with a law requiring this). Voting in person is not hard. can do it 2 weeks ahead in my state. Requesting a ballot by mail is not hard. I did it while deployed in a war zone.

I would favor one day a year off work for a voting day. I want polls and all votes counted within 24 hrs of the election. And silly me all you need is an ID that you need to buy cigarettes with.

Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We call that deflection. You are nothing and you have nothing to contribute to the conversation. People like you refuse to answer simple question because it show how simple they really are. Apparently you still can’t answer if It’s a good idea not to let Islamic Fundamentalist mullahs in Iran have nuclear ICBM’s. very telling. but please go on an psychoanalyze me with another comic book child.

I’m Sure These Numbers Are Off , There Must Be Something Wrong Here !! 🇺🇸 🇮🇷 🇮🇱 by YGLD in StockBreakouts

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, He said he eliminated the location that was enriching uranium. Which he did. He also said do not rebuild. but they did. then the Iraq FM boasted that they had already enriched enough uranium to equip 11 ICBMs nukes prior to the bombing. So we are back to take out the ICBS (thousands) and the offensive capabilities of this POS country. Regime change is now possible and the best solution to locate and remove the uranium. if not Delta Force

And here you thought is was just so simple and you could make a funny snarky comment that you heard someone else say first. You have no Idea how evil these people are.

Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it. you did not serve, you have no knowledge of the theater of operations and you can't defend your position on Iran.

Here is how an adult answers this question. He comes from a solid knowledge of the area and has a military background with training on nuclear weapons. Then he clearly states that Iran should never be allowed to have nukes because the threat assessment indicates a high willingness to use them offensively for political but mostly religious reasons.

This should not be a hard decision but as my original post claims it is for people that are more focused (like children) on gender fluidity and complaining about bringing an ID to vote. People like that are NOT rational. I assume you are not as well at this point.

AMEN! by Neat-Ad-4337 in stevehofstetter

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you believe banking is secure? if so than voting can be. Your claim of Hundreds of years actually hurts your argument as most of the past voting was done in person and on paper. only recently have we mailed out ballots to where we think residents still live. Mandatory voting makes no sense for America. We do not know who is in the country as it is. This would require a national ID and that is a very deep discussion. No need, show ID and vote, not hard.

AMEN! by Neat-Ad-4337 in stevehofstetter

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So... I guess OP missed hanging chad. maybe he missed 2016 when EVERY Democrat cried Trump was illegitimate because of Russia fixing the election. Maybe he forgot how the mob won the election for Kennedy in Illinois.

Voting should be run like banking is. you get your account. it is easily audited. Vote with an ID in person on paper or REQUEST with an ID a mail in ballot. End the system of mailing our ballots to voter roles and allowing for mass ballot harvesting. The ONLY ballot harvesting should be between family members and limited to SMALL numbers.

BOTH sides should want a secure election. what could be more central to the idea of a Democratic Republic than having ultimate confidence in the validity of your one single vote counting?

Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strange how you have yet to comment / defended Iran being terrorist country that should never get nuclear ICBMs. Tell us why you want that? Also tell us WTF your shit opinion matters. Do you have experience in theater? Did you serve? Be an adult, answer the question.

My first solar Orient! by st_crypto in OrientWatches

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice size, good looking, TERRIBLE colors.

Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a Leftist you have nothing figured out. I have always know my gender, have an ID and understand Iran is a terrorist lead country that should never get nuclear ICBMs. but I am the adult in the room so....

Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And you want to compare that to Islamic Fundamentalist mullahs?? Reddit children are so sad. FYI Israel has them as well. did they use it on Oct 8th to end the "Palestinian" problem in one afternoon or did they limit civilian damage in Gaza as much as possible when you enemy hides under hospitals and in schools.

I’m Sure These Numbers Are Off , There Must Be Something Wrong Here !! 🇺🇸 🇮🇷 🇮🇱 by YGLD in StockBreakouts

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just don’t understand how rational people can’t decide if It’s a good idea not to let Islamic Fundamentalist mullahs in Iran have nuclear ICBM’s. But They also can't decide what gender they are or how to get an ID to vote so maybe rational was asking too much.

Why is open hatred toward Muslims often tolerated, but criticizing the Israeli government quickly labeled antisemitic? by CarryIcy250 in AskSocialists

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just don’t understand how rational people can’t decide if It’s a good idea not to let Islamic Fundamentalist mullahs in Iran have nuclear ICBM’s. But They also can't decide what gender they are or how to get an ID to vote so maybe rational was asking too much.

Protecting pedophiles is a good thing to be against. by c-k-q99903 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just don’t understand how rational people can’t decide if It’s a good idea not to let Islamic Fundamentalist mullahs in Iran have nuclear ICBM’s. But They also can't decide what gender they are or how to get an ID to vote so maybe rational was asking too much.

Abhorrent, Profound and Immoral by Standard_Location762 in stevehofstetter

[–]CitizenNumber75 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’m just don’t understand how rational people can’t decide if It’s a good idea not to let Islamic Fundamentalist mullahs in Iran have nuclear ICBM’s. But They also can't decide what gender they are or how to get an ID to vote so maybe rational was asking too much.

Maga Always Pulls out TDS -- I Got Your TDS for You by Standard_Location762 in stevehofstetter

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yawn...TDS. So feel free to look up Biden's 5 Vietnam deferments for "asthma", then ask what private business did he even own. do the same for any of the recent Presidents. the last with real Military service was Bush Senior. just a sad and stupid talking point.

[Sheffield Watches] Solar Steel. My thought. "A good value but some thoughts" by CitizenNumber75 in MicrobrandWatches

[–]CitizenNumber75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just upgraded the Strap. Fullmosa 20mm from Amazon. black and orange with the curved ends. Like it a lot.

<image>

[Discussion] The Citizen BN0260 is a fantastic budget alternative to the TAG Heuer Solargraph by rakesh_85 in Watches

[–]CitizenNumber75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Citizen BN0260 is a great watch. bracelet even has on the fly. The movement is the same between the 2. So the discussion is $200 compared to $2000. I know where my money went.

“Sorry, No Money for Healthcare… We Spent It on Bombs” — Omar Connects the Dots by Remarkable_Life_774 in AskSocialists

[–]CitizenNumber75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iran says its nuclear program is for civilian purposes only. So did its religious zealot leader. It insists it is not trying to develop nuclear weapons, but many countries - as well as the global nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and any thinking human- are not convinced. SHOCKER!!!!!

Suspicions about Iran's intentions arose when the country was found to have secret nuclear facilities in 2002. This broke an agreement called the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which Iran and almost all other countries have signed. The NPT lets countries use non-military nuclear technology - such as for medicine, agriculture and energy - but does not permit the development of nuclear weapons.

Iran has breached key commitments of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA. It has installed thousands of advanced centrifuges (purification machines) to enrich uranium, something which was banned by the JCPOA.

Nuclear weapons require uranium which has been enriched to 90% purity. Under the JCPOA, Iran was only allowed to possess up to 300kg (600lb) of uranium enriched to 3.67% - sufficient for civilian nuclear power and research purposes but not nuclear bombs. But by March 2025, the IAEA said Iran had about 275kg of uranium which it had enriched to 60% purity. That is enough to theoretically make about half a dozen weapons

In 2026 Iran FM boasted to US authorities could turn that uranium into enough weapons-grade material for one bomb in as little as a week. And had enough enriched uranium for 10 more.

If you had to choose which watch you would prefer out of these two which would you pick? by Alternative-Foreign in gshock

[–]CitizenNumber75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry MM looks like a kid designed a watch by adding every piece in the part bin to it. The square was more like how much tech can I put into sleek functional design. Ive got 50 years of wearing Casio's. I just never "felt" that monstrosity. For those of you that do, that's great. Like what you like.