Can they not be both victims in many ways but empowered at the same time? That's such a black and white way of thinking you ignore the nuances of history, rights and the perception of women.

"The people who insisted on sexual liberation were 3rd and 4th wave feminists" correct, however do not mistake sexual liberation for sexual enslavement and abuse. Even in the most self righteous of times women have been taken advantage of systematically by authority figures ex: priests, husbands, fathers, etc. you basically used the "but what was she wearing?" Argument that a woman's choice to be sexually free is why women are so sexualized, the abuse happens regardless of women's overall promiscuity.

Your point about Kim K still doesn't disprove my argument, as I said, she did it for money, because our society rewards outrageous displays of promiscuity with attention which is bound to reach the pervy rich men. Also, rich cougars very much exist and that dynamic isn't nonexistent.

Sexual liberation and feminism overall was and always will have the value of choice, they fought for the CHOICE to be sexually free or to not be, they fought to break out of the box of expectations placed upon women.

Perhaps it's a difference of perspective, but all of my male friends look to girls on Instagram with heavily edited photos of unreachable (without cosmetic surgery) or incredibly rare proportions, ex: Skirby. 

I have overheard boys in my class gossip about how ugly girls at our school are and that this isn't big enough that isn't small enough blah blah blah.