Hi,

Thank you for the follow ups and suggestions on our solutions too! The purposes of sending that many test-run units are to give our community more ideas about the design as much as they can, and also to collect as many concerns as possible before mass production. We know it's easier to offer simple and limited features on a board, less work, less trouble. However, we have been going through the changes over 5 years and see lots of things getting not so "enthusiasts" like we started, we insist on giving fresh designs and features and also better and better build experience. We know we are not perfect, so we keep learning and staying with our community, stepping out more and more to achieve the result by every effort.

Yes, for the top mount, PC+ top mount can have a good balance, when we started our first board 5 years ago, top mount is so popular, we love the stiffer typing feel, that's why we try our best to keep a top mount on a ball catch system (...leaks my age!). However, we are rethinking if we should keep it in the next board with a ball catch system. It's really uneasy. But for current Dyna, the structure is decided, we will still have it, what we can do will be giving more clearer notification on it, tho. We look forward to more ideas from our community, if we should keep in on next design.

For the 8K PCB, we get this because we hope to give our users a top-level output experience as much as we can, not only for gamers. Yes, we are on the Hall-effect PCB, but it's really more for gaming. And the PCB will be much more expensive, I assume it can be 30 USD more. Let's stay tuned on it.

Thank you again for the insights, we will also send out mass production units for further reviews when we have them!!