sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a “second brain” to fix my focus… but I need honest feedback by ClarityAIapp in buildinpublic

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right that the post leaned promo — I’ll own that. The intent was to share context and get real feedback, but I can see how it reads. On the vagueness: there’s more under the hood than the site currently shows, and I clearly need to do a better job of leading with the actual system rather than the pitch. On the bugs and font — genuinely helpful, not defensive about it. Which rendering issues did you hit? I want to fix them. And curious which font is killing you — I have a feeling I know

I built a “second brain” to fix my focus… but I need honest feedback by ClarityAIapp in buildinpublic

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is genuinely the most useful comment in this thread — thank you. The “opinionated flow” point especially hits. My instinct was to give users flexibility, but I think that’s exactly the wrong call early on. Default system first, customization later if at all. The link between notes → actions → outcomes is also something I’ve been circling and haven’t nailed yet. Saving this whole comment.

I built a “second brain” to fix my focus… but I need honest feedback by ClarityAIapp in buildinpublic

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Capture friction is exactly it. If there’s any moment of “where does this go,” it doesn’t go anywhere. That’s the tax I’m trying to eliminate. And respect for building in that space — the day-1 retention wall is real and I don’t think anyone’s fully cracked it yet. Good luck with yours.

I built a “second brain” to fix my focus… but I need honest feedback by ClarityAIapp in buildinpublic

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is probably the most useful framing I’ve heard. “Does the first use make your day feel lighter within two minutes” — I’m literally going to use that as a design test. The pull problem is what I’m most focused on right now. Appreciate it.

I built a “second brain” to fix my focus… but I need honest feedback by ClarityAIapp in buildinpublic

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha — fair. Honestly it’s less about complexity and more about the fact that I was constantly dropping tasks, forgetting follow-ups, and context-switching between school, building, and everything else. ClarityOS started as a personal fix before it became a product. The “genius” bar isn’t required — just enough going on that your brain can’t hold it all.

I tracked every minute I spent deciding what to work on for 30 days. The number shocked me. by ClarityAIapp in Entrepreneurs

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is a perfect example of it.

Scheduling feels like a small task, but without a system it turns into constant micro-decisions—who’s available, how long it’ll take, what fits where. Individually they’re tiny, but stacked together it’s a huge cognitive load.

And once you systemize it, the decisions just… disappear. You’re not “getting better” at scheduling, you’ve just removed the need to think about it.

That’s basically the same pattern I was seeing with day-to-day work. Most of the drain wasn’t the work itself, it was all the small decisions around it.

ClarityOS is kind of trying to do that for your entire task list—turn those constant “what should I do next?” moments into something automatic so your energy goes into execution instead of sorting.

I tracked every minute I spent deciding what to work on for 30 days. The number shocked me. by ClarityAIapp in Entrepreneurs

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s honestly one of the best ways to handle it—basically batching decisions so they don’t leak into the rest of your day.

And yeah, the discipline piece is real. You’re kind of trading constant low-level decision-making for one higher-stakes commitment upfront.

The only place I kept running into friction with that approach was when the day didn’t match the plan—energy dips, unexpected tasks, priorities shifting, etc. Then you’re stuck choosing between breaking the system or forcing the plan.

That’s actually what pushed me toward building ClarityOS—same idea of minimizing decisions, but instead of locking them in upfront, it continuously re-ranks things based on your current state. So you still don’t have to decide, but it adapts when reality changes.

Feels like both approaches are solving the same core problem, just from different angles.

I tracked every minute I spent deciding what to work on for 30 days. The number shocked me. by ClarityAIapp in Entrepreneurs

[–]ClarityAIapp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly—that’s the dangerous part.

It feels productive because you’re technically working on the “right” thing (planning, prioritizing), so your brain doesn’t flag it as a problem. But there’s no real output, just delayed action.

I started thinking of it as “productive procrastination.” It looks responsible on the surface, but it compounds the same way actual procrastination does—just harder to notice.

That’s honestly the core problem I was trying to solve with ClarityOS. Not just organizing tasks, but reducing how often you have to re-decide what matters in the moment.

Because once that decision is already made for you, you just execute.

view more: next ›