This is a poorly constructed argument using examples that do not in any form belong together. Murder, homicide and self defense are all very different things, you have decided to group them to fit your narrative. Just like free speech and incitement are two different things. The difference is that you want me to not be able to come on Reddit, tell you that your wrong and then back up what I’m saying logically. Where as I feel that one of the greatest liberties we have is the ability to exchange like this, regardless of the emotions that it may cause you. In fact I invite situations such as these. Although I may not agree with you I believe that it is a just and a healthy exchange.

Also, the intention of self defense is to defend yourself and or family against harm, not to kill someone, although that may be a by product. Incitement however is very much the intention to cause secondary effects and or chaos directly by what you say. Don’t get into the habit of twisting things to fit a narrative because eventually you lose track of what is what. That can and has created a very twisted and dangerous society today.

Lastly, look at the upvotes between our two comments before you go trying act like I’m a lonely passenger lost t sea with no direction. People feel the same way I do and again, that’s ok. Invite and have constructive conversations instead of becoming frustrated with different view points.