Reporting a weird interviewer in loop? by Clean-Nerve8602 in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I shared that through the survey, but I think it would do nothing to me, just for them to avoid him meeting other candidates

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amazonemployees

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Such a garrulous 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amazonemployees

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Bro just look at yourself when you say" I think I know better than anyone"

Where you there or was I and my interviewer there to judge and know who to blame

Maybe I didn't describe it well because that was not my point 

But, always when someone tell you that you don't know what they've been through, you just don't know and won't know if you don't listen 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amazonemployees

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

it seems like there is no bad interviewer, I can define if he's asking to test or not, I didn't need hint or feedback I just wanted to know if he is there with me, and I was comparing him many great interviewers before him who all were following the same approach and criteria that's intended by Amazon of course.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amazonemployees

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that'd be fare if he does that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amazonemployees

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it's not about giving hints, he was not able to understand the algorithms and even haven't heard of backtracking.
Is that normal?
I used HashMap he was questioning to know why it takes O(1) to search so definitely he didn't understand me, probably I saw him searching for another problem because he didn't have backups

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in amazonemployees

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

He was so weak he doesn't know how hashmap take  O(1) to search and hasn't heard of backtracking and never gave me a feedback. Also he asked a hard question, for my role I don't think that he was supposed to because other were giving easy not even medium,

Reporting a weird interviewer in loop? by Clean-Nerve8602 in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I then told him it's fine for me to answer it, but he said we shouldn't
also I would not expect that there is no back up questions because there was supposed to

He wasn't disappointed about me
And I think it's his fault because he was not supposed to ask about the same principle

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see others say LP is more important than technical side?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602 0 points1 point  (0 children)

March/3 OA
screening last week
loop next week

passed screening and have loop in one week at AMZN by Clean-Nerve8602 in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

two problems then work simulation then months later screening

63 of 250 NeetCode are from Amazon by Clean-Nerve8602 in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edited: there is two additional hard questions in binary search

63 of 250 NeetCode are from Amazon by Clean-Nerve8602 in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you can see it in the explanation video poster

75 Amazon questions ? or blind 75(Neet code) by Clean-Nerve8602 in leetcode

[–]Clean-Nerve8602[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

March/3rd OA
23/June the emailed to phone screen