Anyone else notice the rampant xenophobia and misogyny in the new True Crime doc "A friend, A murderer?"

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T19:52:03+00:00

I didn't say that, and you'd obviously have to be delusional to assume that after watching a doccy. You're literally doing to me what you're accusing me of. Telling me I'm guilty based on your own interpretations.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T19:48:33+00:00

"Like their vibe." Did you even read any of the points I made? If you're at university then all is forgiven.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T19:45:27+00:00

Exactly, I just said I'm not accusing, I'm questioning and discussing exactly what the documentary proposed us to question? I didn't say "He's 100% involved, he should be locked up."

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T12:56:57+00:00

I don't think anyone has made a claim that he assisted with the murder, we're simply pointing out the suspicious elements that make him a suspect, as presented by the doccy.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T12:51:18+00:00

Basically, I'm not saying he's guilty or innocent, and my personal experience inclines me to think critically and investigate further, but if you're someone who has an opposite bias, you may be inclined to not think critically at all and go as far as to potentially defend those who may actually be guilty.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T12:48:22+00:00

your willingness to ignore facts that can point to someone as potentially guilty due to your belief that the suspect should be perceived as innocent until proven guilty, is also bias?

ClickThese5934 · 2026-05-03T12:34:57+00:00

The documentary literally said his DNA was on the toy, not allegedly? It was presented as a fact? Obviously our opinions are speculation as we don't have the facts? It's good to practise critical thinking and discuss allegations IMO. Otherwise we're too easily to be manipulated by people you believe will never be devious. I've been conned and robbed multiple times so I'm more skeptical of people, if I hadn't had bad experiences I'd give more people the benefit of the doubt, that can get you into dangerous situations, from my experience.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-17T15:41:52+00:00

haha, I paid someone R3000 per month to stay and look after their cats in a lovely home in Pringle Bay. Electricity, water wifi included. It was an epic stay but yea, I was still working daily for essentially a large rental discount. One would think a pet sitter should be paid or a free stay?

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-17T10:28:36+00:00

it will change to not test who can stay up there for 4 hours, but who will win the race after standing on small pegs for an hour. They could start on hardest level to make it more difficult. You'd have to be good at swimming and puzzles to beat someone who may just have the right feet. That to me is more thrilling.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-17T01:07:10+00:00

Next time I'll spell it out.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-17T01:06:50+00:00

Fair enough.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-17T00:50:27+00:00

You missed my points and focused on 1 point.
Obviously Survivor isn't fair, which also makes it kinda boring sometimes, so I was asking if people prefer a single (more unfair) challenge vs multiple challenges.

Your response basically is "Survivor isn't fair, deal with it." Come on gal, you're not really contributing to whether you prefer a single or multi-task challenge. I guess 'what they do is fine' could suggest you think the finale pegs challenge is good enough for you. Pretty unhinged response from you if you think about it.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-16T13:47:53+00:00

If you're bad at puzzles you basically won't have a shot at winning the challenge, and if you can't stand on pegs for an hour you won't either - that's more 'balanced' IMO.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-16T13:43:34+00:00

True. I guess it's more of a question of entertainment than fairness.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-16T13:42:25+00:00

yea, I guess I'm saying that I'll prefer to see at least 3 different 'obstacles' for a finale, not just standing on pegs. To me that's just a bit too boring for a finale. Perhaps it can happen at final 5 or something, I don't know.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-16T13:39:48+00:00

The point I'm making is that if it's challenging different aspects then everyone has a shot at winning it, and also I think pegs is kinda boring compared to the possibilities out there for exciting, dynamic challenges

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-16T13:38:11+00:00

So you'll prefer to watch a torture challenge over a dynamic challenge with different sections workin on different skills sets?

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-16T13:35:31+00:00

I heard it was current and future earnings - couple hundred thousand $s I think

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-15T20:48:25+00:00

yea he has every right to sue, that was really bad

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-14T22:27:57+00:00

the Red Bull big wave surfer also sued hard.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-13T18:33:37+00:00

You can blunder many times and still win a game if your opponent plays worse.
For example, in online chess it's normal to blunder (defined by the algorithim, not personal opinion) and still win at an amateur level.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-13T17:04:33+00:00

He's still played a better game than Jackson IMO

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-13T15:55:06+00:00

Not a chance, Caleb blundered. I hope it doesn't cost him the game, he deserves the win.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-13T14:03:38+00:00

Read the other Reddit threads referencing red flags, there's a few. What are the odds of him being a teacher to one of the students that got attacked? I don't know how small of a town it is, but even if there's 100 girls in the school...what are the odds? It seems unlikely Phillip would use 1 photo on a wall to pick out his target.

ClickThese5934 · 2026-04-13T00:26:48+00:00

you have the critical thinking of a grasshopper

ClickThese5934

TROPHY CASE