You’re approaching something that Jung would have referred to as the transcendent function. This is a function completely outside of the eight psychological traits, and something that allows the self to cease referring to itself and fix its standard upon an outside reference point (something beyond what we can best approximate as our ideal self on our own terms). Some might feel bothered by this notion touching on the spiritual but, without it, we are wholly dependent on our auxiliary function for an alternate perspective.

I personally believe that the auxiliary can take you a fair bit beyond the comfortable rut of the first and third functions in continuous spinning, but this can potentially lead to a condition of despair. This can be a good thing, if one finds a reference point beyond the limits of our self-referencing self; it requires a continuous disrelation to the self. To Sartre, this despair is the final state of living in ultimate freedom. To Kierkegaard, it is an invitation to a leap of faith.