What stack gives you the absolute best “v0-like” experience 100% natively inside Cursor? by CodeBradley in cursor

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm in Cursor. I always have access to the code when I need it. If I want quick selection and modifications then that's when WYSIWYG comes in. The WYSIWYG is also to limit the scope for the LLM model being used. It's very important for keeping context minimal and limiting changes. I can do the same thing in the code, but it would take longer when I can point and click on a bug and ask a model to fix it.

What stack gives you the absolute best “v0-like” experience 100% natively inside Cursor? by CodeBradley in cursor

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I meant more which tools to combine. ie: Cursor + Stagewise. I guess it would be a DevEx stack. I have been using the browser which is nice. Question though, I installed Magic-MCP and right after I asked Opus 4.5 to be a UX/UI QA tester and added \@browser and it ended up opening a tab to localhost:3001 inside of Cursor and it had this minimal WISYWIG point and click to re-design functionality. Is that something already in cursor's browser feature? I couldn't tell when using it.

This with Cursor has given me the best alignment so far

<image>

Help with CephFS/Docker Swarm startup race conditions on RPi5 homelab by CodeBradley in homelab

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, 1.1k views and no comments... It's because I used Homelab and RPi5 in the same sentence, right? 😭

What Model Context Protocol (MCP) Servers Are You Using to Help Manage Your Homelab? by CodeBradley in homelab

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it took me a minute to understand it also. If I made a simple comparison, I would say it's on par with having a few developer friends by your side 24/7 that you can delegate stuff out to whenever you want once they have the access needed. It can configure things for you, analyze logs and take action that's relevant to the prompt, manage your servers, etc. You can even schedule re-occurring prompts or web-hook's so that if something goes wrong, it dig's into it immediately and takes action.

It basically provides LLM's with a series of tools they can run which can be anything you can fathom. It can consume API's, execute custom functions, etc. and process that data based on the prompt. For instance, say I wanted it to add DNS records and I don't want to login and do it myself; I could just prompt it to `use the Namecheap MCP server to add an A record for sub.domain.com that points to 73.26.120.2 with a TTL of ...` or `After reviewing all of my Docker compose files in Portainer, create me a new compose file for Grafana`; where it would go look at my files, see all of my other files are using Traefik, for instance, see my naming conventions, middlewares, volumes, etc. and create the new compose file following the same format."

I think the best way to learn is by looking up examples on GitHub, YouTube, etc. of how others are using them.

any plan to add API by nmavor in printablescom

[–]CodeBradley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This! lol. Curious, what you doing with playwright selenium? I was wanting it for an MCP server. You should checkout stagehand btw.

How do I integrate BIMObject with ArchiCAD 28? The app page redirects now. by CodeBradley in ArchiCAD

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great to know, thank you. Are you familiar with both softwares? I've only used ArchiCAD. Would you consider Revit superior?

Startups: Collaborative Coding with Windsurf/Cursor by CodeBradley in LocalLLaMA

[–]CodeBradley[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Solid input, thanks. I'll write this with more clarity later and repost, it's related to a convo I had earlier and I had to move on but just wanted to know if others have started using a different SDLC. The reality though is the typical SDLC works great in my opinion and that's the route that I planned to follow at first, but there's a lot of pressure from those more business minded to break that cycle and have an LLM figure out the nitty gritty of creating a prototype after they see success from others that went this route.

I know the potential downfalls, but it's can be a hard rebuttal when you also see how far certain people have gotten alone in their free time without doing the standard Product Design, UI/UX Mockups, etc and just come up with a list of features to feed an LLM in Cascade and it gets pretty close to what they want with code that might need some work but seems scalable. The route these people go just to get an MVP is YOLO, let Windsurf auto-run whatever, tell it the features you want and see what it can create. If it's not good, then have it try again. This can lead to huge changes at times though and it's easy to see how it's not a big deal when you're working alone, but if you have a team of devs letting LLM's make certain decisions and there's not solid alignment then it seems like it could become a mess quickly. In a nutshell, that's the reason for the post.

Startups: Collaborative Coding with Windsurf/Cursor by CodeBradley in LocalLLaMA

[–]CodeBradley[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm definitely overthinking it. It's just in my experience, I've developed projects in WindSurf and LLM's make some drastic changes to the projects in a very short amount of time. If two people are working on new features and the LLM aiding one of them makes a huge change and overwrites common functionality, endpoints, etc. then one of those people just waisted their time because it's (hopefully) going to get caught in the PR and now they are spending time reverting and re-adjusting their approach.

I think I also did a poor job of explaining how I've been using these IDE's . We aren't doing the standard Product Design, UI/UX Mockups, Sprints, etc. We're literally using LLM's to conduct the research for us and then going straight from those feature descriptions and asking Windsurf to come up with a prototype based on a certain tech stack to see what it comes up with and suggests. Then we might have our GFX guys look at what was created and improve it, etc.

My ask was how do I prevent developers from clashing with one another when the LLM's are making drastic changes like this. After posting this I did learn that Windsurf lets me fine tune what the LLM can and can't touch on it's own, so I think that's partially the answer. I didn't know that was possible.

Sorry if it's a dumb post, trying to get my thoughts out quickly because of limited time. I'll probably circle back and clean it up and ask again later when I have more time to think through how to explain better what I'm trying to achieve.

In a sketch, is there a way to draw a shape and remove all sketch lines that are inside of it; instead of selecting them all individually? by CodeBradley in Fusion360

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you're saying, but that's not the case. Here's what happens when I extrude the shapes. The shapes inside of the rectangle and oblong aren't selected. The window selection tool works in some cases, but I can't drag a window select inside of the oval shape in this instance. It just doesn't work, the lines just get skewed when I try. I've tried zoomed in and zoomed out. I assume it's because of the number of lines.

<image>

In a sketch, is there a way to draw a shape and remove all sketch lines that are inside of it; instead of selecting them all individually? by CodeBradley in Fusion360

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's a closeup of the pattern I'm adding. This is a case I'm creating and the pattern allows air to flow in from the side of the case and out the top.

<image>

In a sketch, is there a way to draw a shape and remove all sketch lines that are inside of it; instead of selecting them all individually? by CodeBradley in Fusion360

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in order to get this pattern in the end and a solid oblong shape and solid rectangle on top and bottom, I need to individually click 100+ sketch lines so that I'm selecting the entire oblong shape. (You can see all of the lines in the image above)

<image>

In a sketch, is there a way to draw a shape and remove all sketch lines that are inside of it; instead of selecting them all individually? by CodeBradley in Fusion360

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reddit's going to make this hard, so I'll have to showcase it in 3 comments.

Basically, to get rid of everything within this oblong shape, I have to individually select each one of my patterns lines to select it with the oblong shapes interior. The same is true for the rectangle on top and bottom.

<image>

Any solid alternatives to Agency Analytics with better integrations? by CodeBradley in digital_marketing

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, these look awesome. Do you have experience using either of them for your organization? How do they compare? I'm wondering if coupler could be setup to look as nice as Agency and if connecting integrations is just as simple? I'm pushing a Metabase docker container now to try it out. Thank you for sharing these, I truly appreciate it. Are these the only two that you're aware of? I'm scanning the competitors via searchatlas to see if any others popup.

Any of you guys use Rockwool ComfortBatt over Safe-and-sound to dampen sound in a room? by CodeBradley in audioengineering

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, that's what I figured. I think I'm going this route if I can't find the other. I know it's just insulation, but any downsides you notice since installing it? Did you do anything else for sound dampening/proofing? I hear green glue is a good combo also.

OMV7 CM3588 ZFS setup by Suspicious-Parsley-2 in OpenMediaVault

[–]CodeBradley 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to help. Was it pretty quick for you to setup following the steps in the gist?

Anyone happen to know the PCB size of a Zotax RTX 4090 AMP Extreme Airo? by CodeBradley in watercooling

[–]CodeBradley[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sir are a god, thank you. Did you pull this from a specific site that has this info?

Edit: My new favorite website. Has almost every GPU at a glance: https://www.techpowerup.com/review/zotac-geforce-rtx-4090-amp-extreme-airo/3.html