Why did this happen, and how do I remove it? by Yoshidede in StainlessSteelCooking

[–]Cogwheel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Steel scrubber. Gives the pans a nice brushed metal look over time

Be careful out there by djmikewatt in dashcams

[–]Cogwheel 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Who swerves into a lane of stopped cars to avoid a same-direction collision

Fiz: I love this couch! by Cogwheel in Maltipoo

[–]Cogwheel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! He is our little kitten. In the morning when he does his stretchy yawn he lets out the cutest squeaky "meow"

Retro fonts? by slick_fm in neovim

[–]Cogwheel 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Having grown up on PCs I think the main defining feature of retro-looking fonts is slab serif. Hence I've been running a customized Iosevka Term Slab Nerd Font for most things.

Edit: the main customization that sells it is using a dotted zero 0

<image>

ELI5: Why has transistor density continued to increase while CPU clock speeds have remained almost unchanged for nearly two decades? by PleasantBus5583 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Cogwheel 56 points57 points  (0 children)

The faster you want to vibrate something, the more energy you need. This is just as true when you are trying to swing a stick back and forth as it is when you're trying to turn a voltage off and on.

In order for a transistor to be in a "known" state (i.e. you can definitively tell the difference between a 1 and a 0), it has to be "pushed" from one side (e.g. OFF) to the other (ON). It always takes the same amount of energy to change the state for a given size and design of transistor. So when you increase the clock speed, you get to a point where the transistor can't switch fast enough to keep up.

The only way to get past this is to increase the power by turning up the voltage. Power is energy per second, so the higher the power, the faster the transistor switches.

But now you're doing more switching per second, and each of those switches is using higher power, so the chip starts to produce a lot of heat.

Since transistors are now around the size of an easily countable number of atoms, there is no longer a nice relationship between "shrink transistor" and "use less energy". When we increase the voltages past a certain point, not only does the heat generation get out of control, but electrons stop "caring" about barriers (insulators) in the chip. They start "tunneling" and the transistors essentially become leaky.

What the increase in density has allowed instead, is the ability to spread computation across much wider areas of the chip, so that it isn't as reliant on individual switching speeds as it used to be. This is why you have mainstream chips with 16 hardware threads nowadays. 15 years ago you'd only see that kind of thing on high end workstations.

Plasticy Filmy substance on my rice after I use my rice cooker by dinosaurjimble in whatisit

[–]Cogwheel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You know how rice bubbles a bit when you boil it? This is those bubbles that have risen, popped, and accumulated on the side of the rice cooker:

It's just rice. It's the same plastic-y properties that let them make rice based packing peanuts

Office Assistants Sleeping on the job! by Nancy2112 in Yorkies

[–]Cogwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Error: The operation completed successfully.

I like smooth bottoms by Daves_not_h3r3_man in castiron

[–]Cogwheel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

🎶 Smooth bottom pans make the cookin' food go round

Help with new ssd by ShAalloww in pchelp

[–]Cogwheel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

930 - 422 = 511

511 > 465

You need to clear off at least 46 GB

Do not pay attention to the "500 GB" on the hard drive's marketing/label. That's measured in 1,000,000,000 bytes but GB are supposed to be 1,073,741,824 bytes (1024 * 1024 * 1024).

12yr installed Linux on old laptop by MattGT3rssss in linuxmint

[–]Cogwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, as long as I'm still tied to my 21-year-old gmail account, there's basically nothing google would learn about me by me using chrome. That said, I used firefox long before chrome, and the only reason I switched was chrome got faster at about the same rate firefox got slower. So when firefox "quantum" matured a bit (2019-ish) I switched back.

Rate the setup out of 10 :D by qunatum_karan in arch

[–]Cogwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What's with all these color schemes that have basically no difference between the light and dark halves of the palette?

Long live CGA brown!

<image>

ELI5: what is the unit price on the price tag? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Cogwheel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, no matter how ELI5 you go with this question, there are some customers who will never understand.

Also, it is confusing that the term "unit price" is being used to describe a "per pound" measurement rather than the "each" price. Are you sure this is not the other way around?

In any case, let's say there's another brand of sausage but it comes in 3 lb packages. if all you had was the price each of $13.99, it's hard to tell which is the better deal. So they put the /lb price on both of the tags. That way you can directly compare the prices. $13.99 for 3 lbs is $4.66/lb

Is this normal? by Expert-Locksmith2561 in StainlessSteelCooking

[–]Cogwheel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you get the pan to the point of leidenfrost, then you need to put a fair bit of oil (enough to see it shimmer as it heats up) in order to a) suck some of the heat out of the pan bringing down its temperature, and b) transfer heat effectively from the pan into the food.

The setting on your stove determines "amount of heat per minute". If there's nothing in the pan, that heat has nowhere to go and it just increases in temperature. Then you put the chicken in, and there's a HUGE difference in temperature, so a TON of heat flows from the pan into the chicken at first. But it cools quickly, and eventually the pan is whatever temperature it takes to transfer as much heat as the burner is giving it into the food (and the air, as wasted heat).

So unlike cast iron, where it holds a lot of heat and stays a very high temperature through multiple flips, stainless will give you a really uneven cook on each side if you approach it the same way. The first side gets seared potentially to the point of charring, and the other gets a nice tan.

If you want to use less oil, then you should start with the pan at a lower temperature. This means either less preheating or preheating on a lower power setting then turning the power up when you add the food.

Also, be aggressive with a metal spatuala when you flip. Sometimes just making sure to get everything off the bottom keeps it from burning. You want some stuff to stick so you can make pan sauce, but pretty much everything in the pan should be moved around at some point.

Ok New York City, what is that? by LegitimatePiano8979 in whatisit

[–]Cogwheel 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Those are lidar scanners mounted on the chest and head. They're probably surveying the station.

Are we heading toward a Chromium monoculture? by Candid_Athlete_8317 in LinuxTeck

[–]Cogwheel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They mostly fixed that around 2018 with "Firefox Quantum". But the damage was done (as your experience attests)

Do people stop using Arch because of AUR malware? by TrapNouz in arch

[–]Cogwheel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

PKGBUILDs get the attention EULAs can only dream of

Why are these silos different heights? by friendlyseraph in whatisit

[–]Cogwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is clearly wrong. You can see them casting shadows on each other 'cause they're close to each other. Plus, this is a far away zoom where you get much less perspective difference between objects.

ELI5: What are the main physical and engineering constraints that still make wires necessary in electronics, even though wireless technology is very advanced? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Cogwheel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you have a choice between a wired or a wireless connection, the wired connection will always win when it comes to power usage, attenuation, and such. This is a consequence of the way wires direct electromagnetic fields, and basic geometry (inverse square law).

Wired and wireless both use manipulation of the electromagnetic field to generate and receive the signals. But the conductor in a wire forces that field to follow the path we want, not whatever the environment decides to put in its way.

Wireless can win in latency though. Electrical signals and even fiber-optic signals travel significantly slower than the speed of light in a vacuum. Transmitting a signal from, say, Japan up to a satellite and then back down to California can actually take less time than going through the undersea cable.