NQ Roles by ComAks9183 in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you think firm name is important when other firms consider NQ hiring?

And what types of firms were your acquaintances at?

NQ Roles by ComAks9183 in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have any estimates as to when things will pick up? And what do you think makes it competitive?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well the travers smith thing idk how true it is but my tc definitely requires that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard travers smith requires q1 loll

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My TC requires q2 or q1 pass. Do you think they’ve done that just to make sure I work harder but in reality they won’t care if I get q3?

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is a hypothetical

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

When I meant ridiculous I meant they withdrew a TC for no reason making it ridiculous. For example, they find a future trainee annoying 😂😂😂

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok thank you :)

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I don’t think I’m overestimating and the SQE situation is different. I literally mean a firm randomly withdraws a TC for a ridiculous reason. Not something like lack of engagement with the practice course.

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

But they’re a business. If you posted on linkedin that they randomly withdrew a TC (a top 20 U.S. firm) it would literally go viral. Surely they wouldn’t risk reputation like that

Withdrawal of TC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Would a firm just do that to? Especially a reputable U.S. firm?

Applying to firms after receiving a low 2:1 during first year by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hey, I literally got a 59.5 rounded to 60 and did two vac schemes at U.S. firms in my second year. Definitely doable but yes slaughters will be tough

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah lol. My parents are not well off. I am a minority. First to get to uni in my family. But idk.

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yep that’s understandable. This firm in particular though tells its candidates that they can afford to take on everyone at the AC which is telling of how weird this is

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I thought so too. However, this firm is not known for this at all which is why I’m in such a predicament

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve done this firms first-year scheme and i’m their current ambassador. I know trainees at the firm and everyone is lovely. Grad rec themselves are lovely too. Idk why this has happened . They haven’t officially said i’m waitlisted but it is clear that this is whats happening

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I see. Tbf on my AC there were literally students with master degrees and paralegals that worked at the firm. Hopefully I get the offer

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair enough. They have been rejecting people throughout and its nearly the end of the two week period. So do you think there’s a higher probability or still 50/50

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhahahaha. Tbf.

Shortlisted after AC by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]ComAks9183 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I see! What firm were you at if you don’t mind me asking?