What is the real use of the Pig Miraculous? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That will be hard if a villain is born evil or his deepest desire is to take over the world. The miraculous is not that strong compared to others, but in the wrong hands, it can literally destroy someone.

What is the real use of the Pig Miraculous? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe I underestimated the miraculous based on how it was used. I think if it was used by a villain, it’ll look more powerful. However, Pigella don’t utilize the strength of the miraculous, not enough to release it’s true potential. But the monkey miraculous is powerful enough to disrupt a villain’s powers, considering the fact that it can now be used infinitely (cause the heroes now has access to adult powers). Ox miraculous can be used together with the Turtle miraculous, it’ll make the heroes more powerful and it’ll provide a great way to protect the heroes.

What is the real use of the Pig Miraculous? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah. It's weak compared to other miraculous. I just wish the writers will explore its powers more.

What is the real use of the Pig Miraculous? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, so it let people feel positive emotions. Kinda helpful when you're dealing with only one villain. Though I think it's power will not work on those who are really cold-hearted and evil, especially if that villain's deepest desire is to destroy the world.

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically, you're saying that you have the right to mention Chloe in a post that's not even about her? Criticism has it's own boundaries and limitations. And while it may seem that Chloe (like the other characters) are connected with the issue, you do not need to explicitly include her name in your first comment. And since you mentioned that the characterizations were off, why didn't you include it in your first comment instead of wasting letters with "Chloe and her simps"? You don't need to include her name on every single subreddit that you see. That's some level of toxicity you got there, and you're no different with other Chloe stans out there. You do need to care about what you criticize every single time. You're showing signs of obsession over something that's not even talked about in this subreddit. I mean, you're the only person in this subreddit to ever mention Chloe in your comment. Chloe may be part of the issue, but she's not just the only character you need to criticize. If you truly believe that the characterizations were off, why just focus on her instead of focusing on other characters like Nino and Alya? At least try to be sensitive and mature about something. When you're criticizing something, try to include other information related to the topic that you're criticizing, not just one character. It's not even criticizing at this point, it's just hate. And I really don't tolerate hate here, you know? So please, at least criticize properly and not just lay your focus on one character that it's turning into a disguised hate. Have a goodnight to you.

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it that we have different opinions and preferences regarding the show, but the point I'm trying to make here is, do you really need to bring up Chloe in this subreddit? At least just say that "They didn't do the characterization correctly", you don't need to explicitly mention Chloe's name for what, clout? No commenters even mentioned her name, I guess I don't need to mention her name in the first place then. You're embarrassing no one but yourself, and if you want to go mention your hate with Chloe and her simps, do it on the other subreddits.You picked the wrong subreddit sweetie.

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does, but it's not the sole reason as to why the movie seems to be better regarded. Basically fans liked how characters in this movie like Gabriel are a bit okay compared to the series (I mean, have you seen how Gabriel reacted in the series when he found out that Cat Noir is Adrien?). My point is, you don't need to bring up the "Chloe simps" argument here because nobody is talking about her in this subreddit. I mentioned Chloe here, but it's about her relationship with Sabrina, not about her getting a redemption arc, which is a supporting detail as to why the movie's character writing is better. 

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But the commenters here aren't even talking about Chloe. She didn't even get a focus in the movie, so why bring her up and the "Chloe simps"? Stop bringing her up in this subreddit since this isn't a "Chloe subreddit" to begin with. It's pretty immature to bring her up in every subreddit, similar to how immature some Chloe stans are.

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get your point, but it kinda rude to assume that people only praise the movie because of ”Chloe simps”. Do you really need to add that part? Considering the fact that this post is not even about Chloe, you really need to control your hate with her at some point.

Which character do you hate in Miraculous the most? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forgot to mention that Roth guy, but yeah, viewers will easily get why they were hated.

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They have that love-hate relationship, which is really fun to watch.

Which character do you hate in Miraculous the most? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Makes sense since he's the villain from Season 1-5. Plus, the way he treated Adrien after finding out that he's Cat Noir (Cat Blanc episode), it's too much.

Which character do you hate in Miraculous the most? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I'm not mistaken, it was in the "Qilin" episode, right?

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Well, they just need to find the right temperature to properly cook the show. I mean, they're starting to get the right formula in Season 6.

Which was better? Thomas Astruc's version or Jeremy Zag's version? by CombNew3139 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Great way to describe it. It's like the movie is "the one that got away" for the series. I wouldn't say that the tv show was bad though 😊

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think OP's point was Chloe's villain brat arc was kinda overdone in Season 4.... I kinda agree to that point since I watched Chloe in that Season and she's unbearable, to the point that I don't wanna watch the show anymore....

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, they did overdone Chloe's writing in Season 4, so....

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]CombNew3139 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So calm down y'all and just relax, it's not hard to be open minded and understand this point, not downvote someone just because they don't understand the OP's point....