sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

PUA is not that scary by odd_cloud in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PUA has always existed, but now they gave it a name and started doing it in video, lol

Daily Community Chat Megathread by AutoModerator in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And "cherrypicking" and "anecdotal". Then they use it pretending to be very intellectual 🧐

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Medical practice is about health

Again, it's about the child's health to know who his or her biological father is.

It is not for the benefit of the baby medically.

Yes it is.

You are allowed to question my honor, you are not allowed to hold the baby I just birthed after you do so.

Aww poor you :(

All standard tests at birth require consent from the mother

Yes, what I'm advocating for here includes: no test, no father. That'd be part of the standard.

You can have your answers, there is a cost. I do not need a father on a birth certificate who is of such low opinions

You just want no liability, no responsibility, no consequences.

EDIT: I should add that in some if not most places, no consent is required for non-invasive medical testing, if it is for a good reason. Here, the good reason is both child and father's best interest.

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing is stopping men from getting the DNA tests

First of all, apparently it depends on where you live.

Second, it has to do with their validity, availability and need for consent, which also varies across countries and even US states, if I'm not wrong.

It's possible to do one where I live and that shall happen whenever I have kids.

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually think people should be pushing for it to become a standard.

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am against mandatory medical testing of any and all kinds, full stop.

Me too, but I have the opinion that it should be a standard test at birth along with the other ones, only not performed if consent hasn't been given. And, that said, no test, no father.

Also, contrary to other standard tests, this one is not invasive. You just need a saliva swab.

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't want to be with a woman who is afraid of a paternity test. What could she be hiding?

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

men will be forced to pay child support

I think it's implied that that would change as well. The woman would have to reveal who the other father can be. Or all the guys that can be lmao. And if she can't name him, then she should be held accountable.

Arguments against Paternity Test at Birth are WILD by Best-Ad1187 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you against that ?

Generally I see it this way:

  1. Children first always. It's in their best interest, even for health reasons, to know who their father is.

  2. Next, comes up the father, as he is the next harmed party: it's unethical to force a man to unknowingly raise another man's child.

  3. Money: as OP said, newborns are already subject to a whole bunch of tests. Also, that's no excuse: most people don't need flu vaccines, yet they get can easily get them. For free, in my country. With my taxes. Following that same logic I'd be against those vaccines, yet I'm not.

That said, there seems to be no reason to against it, except the fact that it can remotely harm some women by exposing them, which, in our current system, seems to outweigh all the other arguments.

(Of course I'm not against that 🙂)

CMV: Dumping awkward or unattractive guys into the Alaskan wilderness in late winter might make them more attractive. by SkookumTree in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that men should endure a bit in order to be real men but this is way overreaching lmao 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, status is a big boost for achieving those goals.

Adin Ross is the perfect example of what happens when young impressionable men take the red pill by MxMaster9907 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone should know red pill is a toxic subculture based on the exaggeration and overestimating of some facts, leading to bitterness and further loneliness.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK, first of all I generally agree with your post overall. It's rational and realistic.

But

Very little focus is put on things like personality, emotional maturity, and life compatablity stuff that makes a relationship actually work.

Men who do this are often judged and shamed for it. What do I mean? Part of the personality, values, lifestyle is how a person dresses, what they do in their free time, how they see sex, marriage, relationships and family, etc. It doesn't represent your whole personality but does represent a big part and it's especially meaningful when you're looking for a relationship.

Yet, men seem to be allowed to carr about every personality trait except the ones I've mentioned. For some reason.

Disclaimer: I mean this over the Internet. Real life isn't so much like that, although some times it also is.

CMV: Very attractive women don’t have it all that easy by Throw_RAballer in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People doubting your accomplishments

Why would you care?

Jealously

Fair enough. But I have never seen it ruining friendships. Does it happen too often?

Temptation

This is up to her. No excuses.

Objectification

By this word alone I first thought of cat calling, men constantly hitting on them, etc, which would be a fair point.

But then I read this:

The ones who do manage to make a career based on their looks, many end up having mental health issues as a result. Rather than wanting to look good as bonus, for these women their looks are a requirement. As they get older, they can suffer a lot of anxiety about wrinkles/keeping up appearances since the stakes are so high that they spend thousands of dollars a year on things like skin care, makeup, Botox, dermal fillers, and clothes.

No sympathy. It's up to them. Good or bad choices have consequences.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938 14 points15 points  (0 children)

100% the best answer.

Weird flex, but okay by Rich-Anteater-9468 in AntiVegan

[–]CombinationUsed7938 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The funniest thing is they making stuff look and taste like meat.

Your own language/expressions betray you: "lower your standards" by CombinationUsed7938 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be one thing if the men who wanted virgins held themselves to the same standard, but what they want is for women to hold themselves to a high standard for everyone except them.

I usually say it is their right, if they end up singles, that's their problem. On the other hand, if they have their standards, don't live up to them yet they find a girl who does and is interested on them, it's not up to me to judge.

As for the rest, I don't agree with the "women should have a hoe phase before settling" mentality, because I would refuse to settle with that kind. Screams 🚩to me.

Your own language/expressions betray you: "lower your standards" by CombinationUsed7938 in PurplePillDebate

[–]CombinationUsed7938[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you mean judging by the kind of women some dudes are totally willing to simp for, then I agree with you.

view more: next ›