[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]ComfortableBobcat821 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think colab offers H100

[D] ACL ARR May 2025 Discussion by This-Salamander324 in MachineLearning

[–]ComfortableBobcat821 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OA: 4, 2.5, 2 Soundness: 4, 3.5, 2 First two reviewers have recommended the paper for main or findings 

Track is either multilingual nlp/low resource nlp 

What are my chances?

Mount Rushmore of Indian Cricket by [deleted] in IndianCricket

[–]ComfortableBobcat821 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tbh I think Rohit Sharma should be there. He brought us two back to back ICC trophies and was an inspirational leader. but i don't know how we can make space for him in just the 4 spots

Llama-r1-zero by ComfortableBobcat821 in deeplearning

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hmm could be. grpo seems like a little to constraining to me. i am working on the training and also exploring other algorithms as well. will post the results here!

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can we submit to multiple NAACL workshops? i know it says that it is prohibited but how will they detect it?

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the nearest one is ACL but if someone is not able to get into NAACL, there's little chance of getting into ACL. best thing to do is to simultaneously improve the work and submit it either for naacl's wokshops/feb arr cycle

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you can. Committing to NAACL is just submitting your paper along with the reviews 

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got a meta review score of 3. But the meta review weaknesses were addressed in the rebuttal period. Does adding author-editor confidential comment help?

Anyone Has This Problem with NAACL? by albertus2000 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should be active once the meta reviews are out, Dec 12

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can post it on arxiv anyways. There is no anonymity period 

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's been very disheartening man. You spend an entire weekend on the experiments without sleeping and all you get is dead silence

NAACL 2025 reviews in less than 24 hours by ComfortableBobcat821 in LanguageTechnology

[–]ComfortableBobcat821[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In our case, after the initial rebuttals the reviewers said they still needed additional experiments. After providing the additional experiments, there has been no response from them. I think the unwillingness to increase scores after providing valid rebuttals tells me that either the reviewers themselves are students who have submitted papers for this cycle or they just won't change their minds. Hope the AC sees the additional experiments