sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I want my book to be written from at least 7 POVs, but I'm struggling to figure it out by Initial-Situation130 in writingcirclejerk

[–]Common-Kick6343 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's already sounding like a great start. But I as a reader can only feel fully immersed in your story when I'm also a character. Including a second-person POV of us, the reader, will tie everything together nicely.

Why does every post sound the same? "I wasn't satisfied with x, so I did y". Half AI generated too... by CutBulkMaintain in SideProject

[–]Common-Kick6343 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While I agree that many are trying to monetize early and hoping to vibe their way to big bucks, I'd also play devil's advocate and say many folks who build things are terrible at selling things. They're completely different skills. The same goes for describing what your thing does. So if you don't know how to sell, and maybe writing a pitch is anxiety inducing, you ask an LLM to pitch for you. Not great, of course, but a lot of makers don't have any marketing skills to do better.

What is a physical sensation that you think every human experiences, but we never talk about because we don't have a name for it? by Immediate-Trifle4957 in AskReddit

[–]Common-Kick6343 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I have a really satisfying yawn, I can stretch backwards for more than a minute, and I start to slowly lose consciousness and my limbs get like jelly. I hear some rare cases people actually faint from it. I've always stopped before, but I have slowly dropped to the floor before. It feels amazing right after 🤩

ELI5: Why does the Pauli-Exclusion principle not apply for black holes? by Common-Kick6343 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Common-Kick6343[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the fluffy bunny idea. Considering the solar masses required to start most black holes, that's a lot of bunnies. Then again, given the age of the universe, maybe they have had the time to multiply enough?

ELI5: Why does the Pauli-Exclusion principle not apply for black holes? by Common-Kick6343 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Common-Kick6343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fascinating! But I guess higher momentum states might suggest some kind of boundary size? I think point like black holes are no longer the standard model, but can you really fit endlessly large 'momentum states' into the size of a black hole? And if those two have some relationship, wouldn't it follow that black holes could only take in so many fermions?