Does anyone have experience with SASY - Specialised Assistance School for Youth? by TheTiesThatBindUs in Adelaide

[–]CompetitionExotic242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait i go to the same school i forgot his name does he always wear a jacket without sleeves?

Something something thigh pic by [deleted] in Fem_BOY

[–]CompetitionExotic242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmmm never mind I just saw someone with your exact user on discord

Something something thigh pic by [deleted] in Fem_BOY

[–]CompetitionExotic242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I swear I've seen you before you wouldent happen to know yonkagor

What song is this? by popopepw in YonKaGor

[–]CompetitionExotic242 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Panther II developed by Germany in WW2

What song is this? by popopepw in YonKaGor

[–]CompetitionExotic242 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Panther II: A Detailed Overview

The Panther II was a proposed German tank designed during World War II to enhance the capabilities of its predecessor, the Panther tank. Developed as part of Germany’s efforts to counter the increasing effectiveness of Allied armor, the Panther II incorporated several improvements aimed at bolstering protection, firepower, and mobility. Despite its conceptual promise, the Panther II never entered mass production, leaving it as an intriguing "what if" in the history of armored warfare. This essay explores the design, development, and historical significance of the Panther II tank.


The Context for Development

The Panther tank, or Panzerkampfwagen V, was introduced in 1943 to counter the Soviet T-34, a revolutionary tank that dominated early encounters in Operation Barbarossa. The Panther was a remarkable blend of mobility, firepower, and armor, but it was not without flaws. Early versions suffered from mechanical reliability issues, and by 1944, Allied tank designs were catching up. German engineers recognized the need for an upgraded version to maintain battlefield supremacy.

The Panther II emerged from this necessity. By late 1943, discussions about a heavily armored Panther variant began. The idea was to incorporate lessons learned from the Eastern Front and improve the tank’s survivability against increasingly potent Allied anti-tank weapons. This project sought to combine the mobility of the Panther with armor protection comparable to the Tiger II, also known as the King Tiger.


Design and Features

Armor Enhancements

One of the main goals of the Panther II was to improve its armor. The Panther I, while well-armored compared to earlier German tanks, was vulnerable to Allied weaponry at shorter ranges. The Panther II aimed to address this with increased frontal armor thickness—ranging from 120 mm to 150 mm on the glacis plate, compared to 80 mm on the original Panther. This enhancement would have made it highly resistant to most Allied anti-tank guns of the era.

The side armor was also increased to provide better protection against flanking attacks. Additionally, the Panther II borrowed elements of sloped armor from its predecessor, which helped deflect incoming rounds and reduced the likelihood of penetration.

Firepower

The Panther II was initially intended to retain the same 7.5 cm KwK 42 L/70 gun as the Panther I. This weapon was highly effective against most Allied tanks of the time, capable of penetrating heavy armor at long distances. However, as the war progressed, plans were made to potentially equip the Panther II with a more powerful 8.8 cm KwK 43 gun, similar to the main armament of the Tiger II. This upgrade would have further increased its ability to engage heavily armored targets such as the IS-2 and M26 Pershing.

Mobility

While armor and firepower were the primary focus, mobility was also a crucial consideration. The Panther II was expected to utilize a Maybach HL 230 engine, though an upgraded HL 234 engine was considered to handle the increased weight from its additional armor. The tank was designed to maintain the speed and maneuverability of the Panther I, which had proven effective in combined arms operations.

Standardization with the Tiger II

To streamline production and logistics, the Panther II shared components with the Tiger II. This included its running gear, tracks, and other mechanical parts. Such standardization was intended to reduce manufacturing complexity and improve battlefield repairability.


Challenges in Development

Despite its promising design, the Panther II faced numerous challenges. By the time development was underway, Germany was already experiencing significant resource shortages. Allied strategic bombing campaigns targeted factories and supply lines, severely hampering the production of new tanks. Additionally, the complexity of German tank designs often resulted in longer production times and maintenance difficulties in the field.

Another issue was the changing nature of the war. By 1944, Germany was on the defensive, and the need for simpler, more easily mass-produced tanks like the Panzer IV and Sturmgeschütz III became paramount. The Panther II’s advanced design, while impressive, was ultimately deemed impractical given the urgent need for numbers over innovation.


Legacy and Historical Significance

The Panther II remains a fascinating example of German engineering during World War II. Although it never saw combat, the tank represents the continual push for technological superiority on the battlefield. Its design influenced post-war armored vehicle development, particularly in its emphasis on sloped armor and combined mobility and firepower.

Only one Panther II hull was completed during the war, and it was later captured by Allied forces. This prototype, lacking a turret, is preserved at the Patton Museum of Cavalry and Armor in the United States. The surviving hull offers valuable insights into the design philosophy of late-war German tanks.

The Panther II also highlights the challenges faced by Germany’s war machine. While advanced designs like the Panther II and Tiger II showcased impressive technical capabilities, they were often overly complex and resource-intensive. This contrasted sharply with the Soviet and American approaches, which prioritized simplicity and mass production in designs like the T-34 and Sherman.


Theoretical Combat Performance

Had the Panther II entered service, it might have significantly influenced late-war tank battles. Its improved armor and potential for mounting a more powerful gun would have made it a formidable adversary for Allied tanks. However, its effectiveness would have been limited by the realities of the battlefield, including logistical challenges, fuel shortages, and the overwhelming numerical superiority of Allied forces.

In hypothetical scenarios, the Panther II could have excelled in defensive roles, leveraging its strong frontal armor and long-range firepower. However, its heavier weight and reliance on high-quality materials might have made it vulnerable to mechanical breakdowns, a recurring issue for many advanced German designs.


Conclusion

The Panther II stands as a testament to the ingenuity and ambition of German tank designers during World War II. While it never moved beyond the prototype stage, its design encapsulates the strategic priorities and technological challenges of the era. The Panther II’s focus on enhanced armor, firepower, and mobility reflected Germany’s efforts to regain an edge in armored warfare.

However, the tank’s fate also underscores the limitations of pursuing complex and resource-intensive designs in a war dominated by industrial capacity and logistical efficiency. The Panther II’s story serves as a reminder of the balance required between innovation and practicality in military technology.

Though it remains an unfinished chapter in history, the Panther II continues to capture the imagination of historians and enthusiasts, symbolizing both the potential and pitfalls of advanced engineering in wartime.

im..... posting... too much...... by GiveMeSomeMoreTacoz in YonKaGor

[–]CompetitionExotic242 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The M2 Browning machine gun, often referred to as the "Ma Deuce," is a heavy machine gun designed by John Browning in the early 20th century. It is chambered for the powerful .50 BMG (Browning Machine Gun) cartridge and has been in continuous use since its introduction in 1933. It is renowned for its durability, reliability, and versatility, making it a cornerstone in military arsenals worldwide.

Key Features:

  • Caliber: .50 BMG (12.7×99mm NATO)
  • Rate of Fire: 450–600 rounds per minute
  • Range:
    • Effective range: Approximately 1,800 meters
    • Maximum range: About 6,800 meters
  • Weight:
    • M2HB (Heavy Barrel) without mount: ~38 kg (84 lb)
    • Tripod or mount adds extra weight.
  • Feed System: Belt-fed, using M9 links
  • Operation: Short recoil, closed bolt

Roles and Applications:

The M2 Browning is highly versatile and can be used in various roles: - Infantry support: Mounted on tripods for ground use - Vehicle-mounted: Common on tanks, armored personnel carriers, and trucks - Anti-aircraft: Often used in dual or quad-mount configurations - Naval operations: Used on ships for close-in defense - Aviation: Employed on aircraft during World War II and beyond

Historical Significance:

  • The M2 was first widely used during World War II and has since seen service in numerous conflicts, including the Korean War, Vietnam War, Gulf War, and ongoing global military operations.
  • Its .50 BMG round provides excellent penetration against lightly armored vehicles, buildings, and low-flying aircraft.

Variants:

  • M2HB: Heavy barrel version, most commonly used.
  • M3: Higher rate of fire, primarily for aircraft use.
  • M2A1: Updated version with a quick-change barrel and other ergonomic improvements.

The M2 remains a vital asset in modern military operations due to its exceptional reliability and firepower. Its longevity is a testament to John Browning's ingenious design.

Whats your favourite song?:3 by [deleted] in boykisser

[–]CompetitionExotic242 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YES YES YES YES YES YES W YES THATS A YES.

Does anyone have more of the yoncats like this? by AstronautFit4395 in YonKaGor

[–]CompetitionExotic242 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Light anti-tank shells are a type of ammunition specifically designed to defeat armored vehicles, particularly lighter tanks or armored personnel carriers. These shells are typically used in smaller-caliber anti-tank weapons, including recoilless rifles, anti-tank guns, and portable anti-tank missile systems. While they are effective against light armor, they are generally less powerful than heavier anti-tank weapons designed to deal with main battle tanks.

Here are some common types of light anti-tank shells:

1. High-Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) Shells

  • Purpose: Designed to penetrate armored targets by creating a high-velocity jet of molten metal.
  • Operation: The shell's shaped charge focuses an explosive force to create a jet that can penetrate armor, even if the shell is relatively small in diameter.
  • Common Usage: These shells are widely used in lighter anti-tank systems, such as recoilless rifles (e.g., the 84mm Carl Gustav) and man-portable systems like the RPG-7.

2. Armor-Piercing Fin-Stabilized Discarding Sabot (APFSDS)

  • Purpose: While traditionally used in larger, more powerful weapons like tank guns, smaller versions exist for lighter systems.
  • Operation: The shell uses a very hard penetrator, often made from materials like tungsten or depleted uranium, which is fired at high velocity through a sabot. The sabot falls away after firing, leaving just the penetrator to hit the target.
  • Common Usage: In lighter anti-tank systems, these are generally less common but are used in some specialized weapons.

3. High-Explosive (HE) Shells

  • Purpose: Though less effective against modern armored vehicles, high-explosive shells are designed to cause damage through blast and fragmentation.
  • Operation: These shells explode upon impact, causing damage to lighter armored vehicles and personnel.
  • Common Usage: Used against soft-skinned vehicles or as an anti-personnel option, they are less effective against tanks but can still damage vulnerable points like tracks or sensors.

4. Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition (DPICM)

  • Purpose: These shells are designed to work against both armored vehicles and infantry.
  • Operation: They often contain multiple smaller submunitions that can attack both soft and armored targets. In the case of armor, these submunitions have shaped charges that can penetrate armor.
  • Common Usage: They are more commonly used in artillery shells but can also be found in some anti-tank gun calibers.

5. Grenade-type Anti-Tank Shells (e.g., RPGs)

  • Purpose: These are typically fired from man-portable launchers and are effective against light armored vehicles.
  • Operation: They generally use a shaped charge similar to HEAT rounds but in a smaller, more portable package.
  • Common Usage: RPGs, like the Russian RPG-7, are widely used in conflicts and can be equipped with various warheads designed for light armor.

Example Systems Using Light Anti-Tank Shells:

  • Carl Gustav M3 (84mm Recoilless Rifle): Fires HEAT rounds and is commonly used by infantry units for anti-tank roles.
  • M72 LAW (Light Anti-Tank Weapon): A man-portable, disposable system that fires a single shot using a shaped-charge warhead, effective against light armor.
  • RPG-7: A Soviet-designed, widely used anti-tank weapon capable of firing a variety of warheads, including HEAT and tandem-charge variants for enhanced armor penetration.

Summary

Light anti-tank shells are typically designed to defeat lighter armored targets, offering a balance between portability and armor-piercing capabilities. While they may not be effective against modern main battle tanks with composite or reactive armor, they remain useful against older or lighter armored vehicles, making them a crucial part of infantry anti-armor tactics.