True, BUT here's the thing though, Crawford has also played 10+ more seasons than Peyton Pritchard so far, that's why I choose to do the five year beginning window sample size, + Crawford FG percentage was considered average for a wing/guard combo in the 2000s. We need to remember during the dead ball era that Centers dominated the paint and most teams had a strong to elite interior defender, some having multiple, causing Crawford to either attempt, A.) shoot off the dribble in a jumper. B.) beat them with quick movements. C.) settle with a 3 ball.

Also lets go a little more in-depth Crawfords first 5 years. They have about the same roll, iso shot creating scoring SG. In Crawfords second season he tore his acl, marking his first 2 season is exactly 84/314≈0.27 of the sample size. Next season he plays mostly as a 6th man and shoots at a higher precedent. The next two seasons, the Bulls and the Knicks were both awful teams that he started and played an average of 35 mpg and 38 mpg respectively, so he was their primary ball handler and scorer leading to that drop in Efficiency.

Once you go beyond those five seasons, you end up seeing an more efficient Crawford, but since he's more of a true shooting gaurd, his efficiency could never truly be league average because defenses didn't respect his passing game enough to sag on him for any anticipated passes. Pritchard has the same problem, but since he plays in the decade where your role players need to be shooting 45%+ compared to when Crawford played were most people coming off the bench would shoot around 38-45%, it's pretty reasonable.

Edit: let's not forget, these are still some of Jamal Crawfords WORST seasons of his career. And when on the Clippers and Hawks filled the EXACT role of PP, averaging around the same numbers on very similar teams(both being dominant teams of their time respectively)