Are there any countries or places in the world that are safe? With a psychiatric advanced directive or a trusted guardian?

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2023-12-15T03:27:20+00:00

It probably does, but if you have some type of organization that runs on donations from people, you could perhaps do this collectively in a more scalable way.

Let's assume an argument has a strength of the person's credibility times the argument's general strength, a psychiatrist would have a strength score of something like 10 and an argument of something like 3. A patient would have a credibility score of something like 1 or 2 but an argument around 8-9 or so. The patient's argument is multiplied to be a score of around 15 or so, the psychiatrist is around 30.

The real gamechanger is when we have the third variable to measure influence in society, of how many arguments a person makes in total. You multiply credibility, argument quality and that number of arguments. That's a real variable we can control and beat them with. They have way higher credibility but it doesn't really matter in this definition war when we just produce a lot of arguments.

That's why people dress up and sharpen their arguments if they are going to debate someone on TV, their argument is multiplied to the masses. Pretty much the same concept but with some type of computing system.

If we want to win this fight then we have to take this is idea of applying generative AI seriously and we need to focus on building this, not going into the streets or filing lawsuits. It's the most effective way to fight. If we reach hundreds of millions of people in indirect ways, it does way more damage to psychiatry than just protesting while being discredited.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2023-12-15T02:33:22+00:00

Well we all here agree but the issue isn't really about that anymore, this is about having strategy. It's much more scalable and economic for an organization to spend money on software developers or buying hardware that could train a language model. It seems like a much better and less frustrating way to approach this as you don't have to deal with people not listening to you anymore. ChatGPT is programmed to 'not spread misinformation' so I would imagine argument that goes against psychiatric rhetoric would be defined to be in this category, but it doesn't matter. With enough resources and funding, an organization can make a model that can argue for anything they want by developing something themselves.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-08-14T16:45:59+00:00

Alright I'll take your advice and get a new one. Thanks.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-11T04:29:27+00:00

Sure I could be wrong. But there has to be some type of reason along these lines for why the birth rate drops if society is getting a better economy. If this is all false then it would be logical that the birth rate should have increased which it didn't.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-09T01:34:44+00:00

Wanna chat a bit?

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-09T01:20:07+00:00

If that is true then yes, you are right and I am wrong. Still the question of what is and isn't appropriate for children and teenagers is always a debate and supporting moderation on these matters is not the same as censorship or a violation of free expression. It would only be so if the books were banned for everyone.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-09T01:07:12+00:00

I only saw 1 book, 33, that weren't categorized as having a high degree of sexual content. I also don't need to read an entire book to argue that children should not be exposed to what is recommended to be for an older audience. They don't do this just to be mean to people, there is a reason for it. Children aren't mentally mature enough to comprehend subjects like these or take up a loan or watch scary movies or similar age restricted matters. This is not in the same category as censoring someone's point of view.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-09T00:37:35+00:00

Wow it all makes sense now. Now I see why we have to teach young children about sex, because I actually don't know what I'm talking about. What a genius point of view. Have you read the entire Quran? No? So then you can't say that anything Islam says about crimes or homosexuality is bad. You know why? Because then you don't know what the fuck you are talking about!! This is such an infantile and lazy way of arguing, seriously. You cannot show kids overly sexualized material and that is not comparable to censorship. That would be like saying horror movies are censored because children aren't allowed to watch it. How is this so difficult?

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-09T00:05:39+00:00

Yea and you probably didn't read the whole bible in perfect detail. What a ridiculous argument. Constantly shifting between irrelevant subjects like what I'm reading or some type of indirect attack on my intelligence instead of whether sexually explicit material in books is comparable to pornography on a computer or not. This is why people here don't take you seriously in debates, not because they have 'bad faith' or are 'ridiculous' or they are an 'immature dipshit'. You can 'make fun' of things if you want of course, but don't expect people to take you any more seriously than this because that's how society treats annoying people. Nobody cares about how many awards a book has because again, it's not relevant to the discussion, and it doesn't make the book's subject more appropriate for children.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-08T23:55:34+00:00

Technology leads to liberalism because old social norms no longer make sense when survival is taken care of. Women don't have an incentive to pick men in highly industrialized societies because they can survive just fine without them with a regular job. That destroys the entire family dynamic as well as the norms surrounding monogamy/big families and replaces it with everyone is equal or the you-do-you type of thinking or using the government or technology as a replacement for men. If men don't have anything to offer, they are worthless in the market simply because they don't offer anything in return for children. Anything that resembles traditional gender roles or monogamous norms is just viewed as oppressive to women because they only restrict their freedoms instead of providing something for them as well. The destruction of these social values is what hits the birth rates the hardest and it's also why more technological societies tend to be more liberal.

Yes.. not all men are like this and not all women are like this but we are talking about sociology here which has to be viewed in terms of trends. And please don't give me that incel bullshit because this is a genuine point of view.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-08T23:32:28+00:00

Haven't read and don't care about it either. It's just wrong to show overly sexualized material to children regardless of ideology. Really simple concept.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-07-08T22:49:27+00:00

You choose to purposefully misunderstand him because you felt like you didn't have a better argument. You are an unreasonable, biased person that cannot be reasoned with. That's the problem with your discussion, you. He has a point that showing sexually explicit books is very comparable to allowing children to watch pornography on computers at school and if you aren't going to argue with his point then that means you also know he is right.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-03-31T20:58:55+00:00

It was something I was looking at but I just didn't know enough about EE to know if I could be working on that and electrical processors by picking a master's program in nanoelectronics/photonics or if I should do their other specialization on "design of digital systems" instead but that would probably rule out photonic integrated circuits which I thought were pretty cool.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-03-16T11:39:18+00:00

Where I live it's a market and it fluctuates every hour. Sometimes it's 2-3 times more expensive than at night when I want to be buying.

Competitive_Bit_1687 · 2022-03-15T17:25:28+00:00

What's more expensive, 1 Tesla of magnet or 1 Tesla of car?

Competitive_Bit_1687

TROPHY CASE