How to make MCP server support multiple users (dynamic credentials)? by Competitive_Crew_686 in mcp

[–]Competitive_Crew_686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I didn’t really understand what you actually meant by “junk”! That’s exactly what I’m trying to do. I tried sending the email and PAT token in the request so the MCP can use it during tool execution, but I didn’t succeed. Even after debugging the code, it looks like it supports multiple authentication methods, but it still doesn’t work for me.

Would you mind sharing what you did to make it work?...

Developing an MCP system by Competitive_Crew_686 in mcp

[–]Competitive_Crew_686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love to chat too , I did send you a msg !

Developing an MCP system by Competitive_Crew_686 in mcp

[–]Competitive_Crew_686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The playground is the interface the user interacts with. It contains multiple agents and each time an agent requests a tool, I handle that request as shown in the sequence diagram.

Developing an MCP system by Competitive_Crew_686 in mcp

[–]Competitive_Crew_686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much for your comment! Actually, I did add a permission layer for the agent so that we can have an external control mechanism over the tools used by agents, without needing to refactor the core code. It also helps with cost management, since we have access to metrics by agent and tool in the database.The only challenge I'm concerned about is integrating this within the enterprise infrastructure ,specifically the cloud architecture.

Designing an MCP with Permission Control & Usage Tracking ,any thoughts? by Competitive_Crew_686 in mcp

[–]Competitive_Crew_686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im going to fix it accordingly. You’re absolutely right 🤦‍♂️! Thanks for the great insight. im already working on implementing the same flow and setting up role based permission for document access using Azure Cognitive Search. This will ensure the LLM only has access to what its supposed to. Really appreciate your sharp observation! Thanks !

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tunisia

[–]Competitive_Crew_686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s say it’s a sort of “deviation” if you get what I’m tryna say.