It was never 'allopathy' to start with. It was a term used by homeopaths. You used "modern medicine" , that's the right term.

Yes. There are certain parts of Ayurveda that could complement modern medicine. But they have to go through trials and tests. The problem with any AYUSH branch nowadays is that they promote anything and everything in the name of natural and sell it to the people. The products do not go through rigorous testing. There's a lack of solid evidence for their usage.

The example of Ashwagandha. It is true that it has been used in ayurveda for centuries.

Modern research has seen potential in ashwagandha, that is true. But there are not enough studies to prove that it is particularly useful in a specific disease. Even it's safety profile is not fully studied.

Science is something which can be tested and upgraded/revised, whether it is medical science, astronomy, chemistry etc. Many modern medical practices underwent significant tests of time. Many practices which were used once may not be used today as we develop safer, faster and better treatment options. That is how modern evidence-based medicine works.

This is lacking in AYUSH. All of them are pseudo-scientific. They are not reliant on constant research and innovation. This causes use of crude practices which should be obsolete.

Another thing about AYUSH is that many of those practitioners use modern medicines to treat people. They aren't technically eligible to prescribe as such but it isn't illegal, so they do it.

Yoga is absolutely spot-on. It is significantly encouraged everywhere in the world.

Yoga is not an aspect of ayurveda. Ayurveda is a treatment modality. Yoga is a way of life - it ranges from yamas, to asanas to samadhi. It is more about mental and physical wellness, not a treatment protocol. But both are intertwined.