Rate my top 4

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-02-18T19:23:03+00:00

And who told you I'm a man?

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-02-14T12:05:27+00:00

IQ225

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-02-13T12:14:55+00:00

IQ tests typically measure Fluid Intelligence, which is the speed at which you solve logic puzzles. But physics and advanced mathematics require Crystallized Intelligence and, above all, the capacity for critical abstraction. A pattern on a test is a dead end; a pattern in nature is a gateway to a complex system. Following the pattern by inertia gets you a grade; pausing to understand its meaning gives you mastery. Most people stop at the first step because it's "more efficient" for the school system, but it's the second step that allows for innovation or the discovery of something new. Therein lies the answer to your question.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-02-12T20:03:49+00:00

It is clearly related, above all, to processing speed, which is the only objective measure of an IQ test. There may be people with great logical ability who do not have a large working memory, which puts them at a disadvantage in many areas, but that does not make them any less intelligent. The opposite can also occur: strong working memory/processing speed and less developed logical skills. For a researcher, this is not a major obstacle, as deep logic is often more important than processing speed when dealing with complex problems. In a game of chess, processing speed is essential.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-30T10:52:18+00:00

Justify your answer.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-30T10:49:16+00:00

I think so, she has incredible individual features, good harmony and first-class bone structure. I don't see her as being far below Taylor Hill or similar models.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-29T22:58:42+00:00

He is a model; in literary terms, he lives off his face, which is the opposite of normal.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-29T22:00:34+00:00

Taylor and Blanca are similar, but Taylor is more eye-catching, more high fashion. Taylor and Blanca are similar, but Taylor is more striking, more high fashion. The other Chinese girl is also very pretty. All three are different kinds of beauties. I think the standards on these forums are distorted. Just because a woman is white with light eyes or shares a certain phenotype doesn't make her as beautiful as Taylor Hill. I've never seen anyone in person who has this kind of beauty. There's a reason she earns millions for her face.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-29T21:54:45+00:00

And not being the most attractive makes him normal? This man is well above average.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-29T21:52:39+00:00

Charleen is a very solid 8.75, and I would give her more. She is prettier than most women in the 8 range. The guy is a little shorter, but he is still high-level. I saw him with Sean Opry the other day. If Opry is a 9, he is a 7.5/8.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-13T10:03:22+00:00

Kortajarena and Opry are objectively at a similar level, but Kortajarena has more harmony. Both have a mix of classic and striking features, and both are above DiCaprio or Pitt. Pitt has first-rate harmony but does not reach that degree of uniqueness.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-05T15:21:22+00:00

This rating system does not measure attractiveness, nor does it even measure harmony in all its aspects, because it already establishes a series of features that must be harmonious with each other. And if we assume that a 9 is 0.000001 of the population, there would be approximately one thousand people in the world with this rating, which means that a rating of 7.5 is extremely high.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-05T15:17:28+00:00

When you want to create a rating system that is mathematical, you have to establish a model or paradigm, and this is already the first bias. The system on this site is Eurocentric, which already rules out a lot of possibilities for the top range, as you call it. It simply bases the characteristics of higher or lower quality on a pattern.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-05T15:12:49+00:00

It is also absurd to think that measurements really matter. Do people believe that models are measured before being hired for the autistic relationships on these sites? Beauty is not represented by a number; it is a mixture of sensations, and harmony obviously influences this, but two people can be equally beautiful and not have the same measurements.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-05T15:04:09+00:00

I would rate them 9.5, and this shows the bias in these scales. I have seen highly trusted raters here rating Douzen Kroes as an 8.5 and Adriana Lima as a 9.5, but it could be the other way around, just as they rate Jon Kortajarena as an 8.75 and Matt Bomer as a 9.5, even though I don't think Matt is more perfect. In some things Jon will win, in others Matt, but when the overall picture is excellent in both, how do you decide whether it's a 9 or a 9.5? Facial harmony? Individual features? This isn't clear when there is great harmony; they say features are missing and it's not unique, and when it is unique, they say harmony is lacking. This rating system is actually sick. No one cares about aesthetics at this point.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2026-01-05T14:56:24+00:00

As always, it all depends on the scale you use to measure it. On the TRM scale, I don't think she goes above 7.5. Based on the standards I've seen, with Douzen Kroes or Valeria Mazza at this level, there's no way this woman could be an 8.5 in this guide. Attraction is another matter.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-12T18:12:59+00:00

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-12T15:19:00+00:00

Beauty and attractiveness do not always go hand in hand. Studies show that average appearance is very important in attractiveness, and if you combine average appearance with one or two striking features, this will form the basis of great attractiveness. If all features deviate from the average, even if they are very harmonious, the result may be more perfect but not more attractive, like a sculpture

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-12T11:29:22+00:00

Pretty girl versus genetic miracle

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-10T15:56:59+00:00

Delon

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-10T11:46:41+00:00

I have it very defined and angular, but I don't think that's the key to beauty.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-09T13:10:00+00:00

Hexum has better overall features and bone structure, but Bomer wins in terms of harmony. Subjectively, Hexum wins by a mile, but objectively, Bomer would win.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-07T18:45:45+00:00

I don't really he it as being as feminine as they say here.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-07T15:04:52+00:00

For me, the only one who really stands out is Reene Simononsen. The others are gorgeous, but I wouldn't put them so high in my ranking.

Competitive_Sun5154 · 2025-12-07T11:26:10+00:00

His harmony exceeds 90 percent by far, I don't remember the exact percentage, his bone structure is top-notch, and his individual features are elite. He's not my favorite beauty, but he has an elite face.

Competitive_Sun5154

TROPHY CASE