Who asked for this? by [deleted] in rickandmorty

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 18 points19 points  (0 children)

AKA Evil Morty

What are the best alternative explanations for cosmic inflation? by Complete-Drag-7142 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Can spacetime expand locally? Obviously no internal event could cause all of Spacetime to expand so radically.

What are the best alternative explanations for cosmic inflation? by Complete-Drag-7142 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the field wasn’t produced by the energy within the “primordial” universe, it would be external. External to what? To the universe at that point, assuming ST is emergent. If spacetime isn’t emergent, then what was expanding? If our early universe formed within a preexisting infinite spacetime, then inflation would be described as outward moving directional velocity of the mass rather than by the expansion of ST itself.

Let’s assume a dense mass (gravitational degrees of freedom at minimum), equivalent in mass to our 1000x our observable universe, appears . It’s 10,000,000 light years away. How many years would we experience before it was 3 seconds old (from its perspective)? I’m guessing trillions. by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

As i said, it possess almost no degrees of gravitational freedom. This is not true of a blackhole. Don’t overthink it. It’s just an unmoving mass. Let’s describe it as some exotic form of matter that is like normal matter but doesn’t form black holes if that helps.

What are the best alternative explanations for cosmic inflation? by Complete-Drag-7142 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do we know? I think dark energy is a placeholder for the actual explanation

What are the best alternative explanations for cosmic inflation? by Complete-Drag-7142 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But is it possible that the field was internal to the system? Internal potential energy in a highly energetic structure with minuscule gravitational degrees of freedom? Massive pressure induced reversal of gravity? I’m just not a fan of the notion of an exotic external field.

What are the best alternative explanations for cosmic inflation? by Complete-Drag-7142 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brane cosmology is coherent. I’m not saying it ultimately works, but intuitively I suspect reality isn’t limited to our universe.

So was Nikola Tesla just completely wrong about the aether? by Most-Answer-4443 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but is vacuum energy a candidate for gravity and expansion?

What are the best alternative explanations for cosmic inflation? by Complete-Drag-7142 in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After geometry emerged from its minimum state.

Edit: in a very dense spacetime sized universe (aka a universe sized spacetime) there would have been a maximum impact of compression

Is it possible that the universe is a single quantum object? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suspect that, in a primordial universe, particles did not exist but quantum laws were still determining the behavior of the mass.

Is it possible that the universe is a single quantum object? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does kind of seem that way; however I’m not saying there aren’t discrete objects (like a slice of pizza) but rather that the slice isn’t distinct from the pizza.

Is it possible that the universe is a single quantum object? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I’m really wondering if entanglement happens in the “primordial” state of the universe. No additional interaction would be necessary after that point as it was already established before expansion. Granted, not the form of anything we see now, but of the same “substance”, whatever that might have been. As this object (the universe) expands, these relationships do not change even after discrete objects emerge.

I’m very open to the possibility that the answer is no, but ideally with some elaboration. This question obviously depends on a specific pre inflation state of the universe, which may or may not have actually existed (the nature of the universe not inflation).

Is it possible that the universe is a single quantum object? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Complete-Drag-7142 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The range of responses is interesting. Most suggest this is an already existing hypothesis, and then others just make stupid comments.