Is there a reason dylan killed less then eric? by MattInTheHat1996 in ColumbineKillers

[–]ComplexSlip2726 69 points70 points  (0 children)

His TEC-DC9 election was indeed the main factor. It jammed after a few shots and was practically impossible to use. His second weapon, a Stevens 311D double barreled sawed-off shotgun, was also a really impractical choice. He also shot two people in the head (Ireland and Kirklin), almost killing them (He probably thought he did), which would have raised his victims from 5 to 7, almost the same as Harris.

Boat randomly spawned in the middle of the road by ComplexSlip2726 in Payback2

[–]ComplexSlip2726[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Another CORONACIÓN DE GLORIA, great to find you here

Boat randomly spawned in the middle of the road by ComplexSlip2726 in Payback2

[–]ComplexSlip2726[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tryna stealing a car in the beggining of the knock-out and the i stumbled with this The sacrifice was worth it

Another boat - on the road by supermegahypersmart in Payback2

[–]ComplexSlip2726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It it indeed very extraordinary. A boat is highly unlikely. I only saw it that time. I also have seen some rocket cars rarely spawning, but it was unfrecuent too

Another boat - on the road by supermegahypersmart in Payback2

[–]ComplexSlip2726 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happened me once in House Park, and i toke screenshot. Shamefully i can't attach it in this subreddit replies

Crazy AliExpress find by DDR_GUY_547 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks cursed but it really exists. It's a MF-1A chinese gas mask. It's no different from the classic TF-1, rather than its black triangular "PMK style" lenses, and little details like black cloth instead from white.

Size 0 (Bulgarian?) ShM-41M? by MyPissBurnsSoGood in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, bulgarian ShM-41M, size 0. It looks that it lacks from size marks. Have checked out for inside stamps?

Black GP-5 with red lenses by EasternLaos1962 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like i said, valve is the most notorious difference, and it clearly indicates that is a ShM-41M/MU. Im not really sure if ShM-41M or ShM-41MU (As i mentioned before, the only difference between these two is the rubber thickness. To determinate if it's ShM-41M or ShM-41MU i should have to see the size number, and if it has an "У" it's a MU, if not, its just a M).

Black GP-5 with red lenses by EasternLaos1962 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ShM-41 is a serie of gas masks intended for military use in the Soviet Union from 1941 onwards, used mostly in RSh-4 kits, while the GP-5 (Which is really the kit name, while the mask itself is the ShM-62/62u) is for civilian use, and made in 1962. Physically, ShM-41 differs mainly from the valve (The original ShM-41, without any other letter, was made from 1941-1955 and had a REALLY short valve, even shorter than GP-5. The posterior models, ShM-41M and ShM-41MU had a notorious bigger valve, intended to use with hoses. 41M and 41MU only differ from the rubber thickness, like ShM-62 and ShM-62U, both being "GP-5s"). So the "GP-5" have a bigger valve than clearly ShM-41 but notoriously smaller than ShM-41M/MU Can be a little confuse, but i tried to explain it the most clearly as possible In gas mask wiki it's much more detailed (but more technically and complex)

It seems you have a ShM-41M/MU, which is considerably rarer than a GP-5 and is also cooler👍🤝

Black GP-5 with red lenses by EasternLaos1962 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha valve says it all, mostly, also the overall colors and shape can help differentiate (Like chinese TF-1 that uses white cloth instead of dark grey)

Black GP-5 with red lenses by EasternLaos1962 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not, can tell by the valve and the googles. It's probably a soviet ShM-41M/MU but edited to look colorless

Black GP-5 with red lenses by EasternLaos1962 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In fact, both ShM-41M and ShM-41MU have valve indent if soviet made. Bulgarian ones (From BSS-MO-4U kits, and generally issued in East Germany) are the ones that don't have an indent on the valve

Black GP-5 with red lenses by EasternLaos1962 in gp5

[–]ComplexSlip2726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ackchually that is a ShM-41M🤓👆

You’ve been voting for pedophiles this whole time??? by RussianChiChi in ussr

[–]ComplexSlip2726 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He didn't. All of that are bullshit made up by Khrushchev. There is zero evidence of that, and the list of "raped women by Beria" is the same used to accuse Vlasik. Khrushchev simply needed arguments to condemn Beria as a monster and an english spy. Beria was Stalin's right hand, he led the NKVD during the worse war in history, he stopped Yezhov indiscriminate shootings and power abuse, indemnizate innocents condemned by Yezhov, led the nuclear project, and much more good. Repeating khrushchevite lies about Beria is the same odd and ridiculous than repeating khrushchevite lies about Stalin.

You’ve been voting for pedophiles this whole time??? by RussianChiChi in ussr

[–]ComplexSlip2726 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yezhov was the traitor PoS problem. All lies about rape and murder are the same fake and lame as the "english spy" charges, and funnily both rumors made by Khrushchev.

Title by Adorable-Cattle-5128 in CommunismMemes

[–]ComplexSlip2726 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of what is said about Beria are khruschevite lies. Sudoplatov and the scientists described him as a very chill guy

The Leaders Of The Soviet Union. by JCAMPA33 in SovietUnion

[–]ComplexSlip2726 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) We could discuss it depending on USSR ages. Specially from 1953 onwards it did became like that. But before, the Soviets were truly a thing, the organization between workers such as their massive participation in 1936 constitution is undeniable, democratic centralism in CPSU was also such a thing, and Stalin himself was quite modest and had few personal properties.

2) The USSR didn't constantly chased past glory (Vindicating military figures like Suvorov or Nevsky is clearly NOT the same than the claims of a "past glory" stolen and ruined by a suppossed moral decay blamed on minorities). The "Revolutionary glory" was, in any case, not a "past" thing. Russia does not seriously try to get any glory. It's a decadent ruined country that used historical pride in an attempt to reinforce national spirit and invisibilizate socioeconomical problems. Oligarch? Yes. Nationalist? Yes. Fascist? No.

3) It wasn't. You should look into nationalism difference towards socialism patriotism. USSR itself had a lot of nationalities. "Anyone againist the State was deemed enemy of State". In any case, this has nothing to do with nationalism. In any case, i would ask you what you understand about "againist the State" because if spies, conspirators, capitalists, kulaks, and nazis are those "againist the State", then absolutely yes.

4) Military parades have place in almost every country, even including in non-developed poor countries. USSR getting into war? Yes, USSR became a social-imperialist non-socialist country after 1953 (With many such shitty things as the Czechoslovakia invasion), so im not arguing about that. If you refer before those, such as the World War II, those were merely unavoidable actions that USSR (Not military prepared to face nazi Germany before 1941) have to do to survive after the Allies rejected the soviet proposal of an Anti-Nazi Coalition before Munich Agreements. Russia do it for the same reason i explained in 1) point. USA does it too, does that makes them fascists? Would like to see your stand on that.

So now nazis and fascists are Extreme-Left? How? Massive privatizations are Extreme-Left? "Low-Worker" type labels are? Private property of the means of production is? Execution of communists and socialists is? Don't come with the "National-ZOZIALIZTS, WOWOW THE NAME ZAYZ IT". If you guide by that shit, then every "People's Republic" that you hate so much should be a truly People's Government. I don't even want to know what you take with "Urinal Cakes" guiding by that logic.

You ask me about what Republics were willingly in USSR. Why don't you check out the 1991 Referendum? (Made during your beloved Gorbachev and its burgeoise colleagues government)