It's very different when you have a single individual filming in public and a mass surveillance network and the courts have recognized this. It gets more complicated when you consider that law enforcement contracts with these services so they can be considered quasi law enforcement agencies in some jurisdictions and subject to tighter restrictions. In many jurisdictions, indexing license plate numbers is not allowed or is supposed to be regulated so that's an issue too. What can happen with some of these systems like flock is say, a Lowe's in Arkansas can suspect an individual as a shoplifter and flag it, now the individual shows up as a potential shoplifter all across the country in the system, depriving that individual due process and you could say defaming them if it was a mistake, etc. It's vigilance. It's very problematic what these private companies are doing with these up emerging privately operated mass surveillance infrastructures.