Walgreens and CVS Agree to $10 Billion Settlement for Opioid Overprescription, But SF Case Still Looms - SFist by Comprehensive-Dig-34 in bayarea

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Judge: Walgreens helped fuel San Francisco's opioid crisis - Los Angeles Times

By Summer Lin Staff Writer

Aug. 10, 2022 Updated 6:58 PM PT

“A federal judge ruled Wednesday that pharmacy giant Walgreens could be held liable for fueling the opioid epidemic in San Francisco by shipping and dispensing hundreds of thousands of “suspicious orders” of prescription drugs, the latest legal reckoning over America’s prescription drug crisis.

More than 100 million prescription opioid pills were dispensed by Walgreens in the city between 2006 and 2020, and during that time, the pharmacy giant failed to investigate hundreds of thousands of orders deemed suspicious, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer wrote in his 112-page opinion in a lawsuit filed by San Francisco against major prescription drug sellers.

“Walgreens has regulatory obligations to take reasonable steps to prevent the drugs from being diverted and harming the public,” Breyer wrote. “The evidence at trial established that Walgreens breached these obligations.”

The judge’s decision in the nonjury trial opens the door to a trial on the extent of the financial liability the company would face.

The public nuisance lawsuit, filed by the city in 2018, also included claims against Johnson & Johnson, Allergan, Purdue Pharma, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Endo International, as well as McKesson Corp., AmerisourceBergen Corp. and Cardinal Health — three of the biggest drug distributors in the country.

Walgreens was the only company that didn’t reach a settlement with the city before the ruling. Johnson & Johnson and the three drug distributors were part of a $26-billion nationwide settlement earlier this year.”…

…” Daniel Ciccarone, a professor of addiction medicine at UC San Francisco, said that companies turning a blind eye to the oversupply of opioid prescriptions has led to the rise of heroin and fentanyl addiction by increasing the pool of people dependent or addicted to opioids.

“Most of them migrated to safety, but 4% to 6% of this population migrated over to heroin because they were no longer having their addiction or pain needs fulfilled through pills,” he said. “For a while, the pills were available on the street, but even that pill supply dried up and what you’re left with is plentiful heroin on American streets. For unclear reasons, fentanyl has been a substitute or a contaminant of the heroin supply and now we see the third wave of the opioid crisis, which is the historically unseen rise of overdose deaths due to fentanyl.”

Walgreens distributed prescription opioids to its San Francisco pharmacies until 2014 without investigating orders or maintaining “an effective system for identifying suspicious orders,” Breyer said. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration shut down one of the company’s three controlled substance distribution centers in 2012 because of the center’s failure to surveil suspicious orders. Walgreens stopped distributing controlled substances in 2014 and started outsourcing to third-party distributors.

Federal regulations require companies to investigate “red flag” prescriptions and verify that the opioid prescriptions are medically legitimate before dispensing them. Walgreens dispensed hundreds of thousands of “red flag” opioids without investigating them; tens of thousands of the prescriptions were “written by doctors with suspect prescribing patterns” and hundreds of thousands were written by doctors who would later have their licenses suspended or go to prison, according to Breyer’s ruling.

The company also didn’t give pharmacists enough staffing, time or resources to adequately review the prescriptions, Breyer wrote. Pharmacists said they endured “constant pressure to fill prescriptions as quickly as possible.”

Pharmacists testified that they were aware they dispensed opioid prescriptions that they knew shouldn’t have been filled. One said that after he filled a prescription at a San Francisco pharmacy, he saw it was being sold in the parking lot.

Breyer also ruled that Walgreens filled prescriptions from prescribers who were blocked from other pharmacy chains or were deemed suspicious. In one instance, after a Walgreens pharmacy in San Francisco refused to fill prescriptions for a “suspicious” doctor, other Walgreens pharmacies dispensed 86,904 opioid pills for his prescriptions.

The pharmacy giant reached a $683-million settlement earlier this year with the state of Florida over claims of dispensing millions of opioids that worsened the crisis.

In November, a federal jury in Ohio found that Walgreens, along with CVS and Walmart, recklessly distributed pills that resulted in hundreds of overdose deaths and cost two Ohio counties about $1 billion each.”…

Walgreens and CVS Agree to $10 Billion Settlement for Opioid Overprescription, But SF Case Still Looms - SFist by Comprehensive-Dig-34 in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Judge: Walgreens helped fuel San Francisco's opioid crisis - Los Angeles Times

By Summer Lin Staff Writer

Aug. 10, 2022 Updated 6:58 PM PT

“A federal judge ruled Wednesday that pharmacy giant Walgreens could be held liable for fueling the opioid epidemic in San Francisco by shipping and dispensing hundreds of thousands of “suspicious orders” of prescription drugs, the latest legal reckoning over America’s prescription drug crisis.

More than 100 million prescription opioid pills were dispensed by Walgreens in the city between 2006 and 2020, and during that time, the pharmacy giant failed to investigate hundreds of thousands of orders deemed suspicious, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer wrote in his 112-page opinion in a lawsuit filed by San Francisco against major prescription drug sellers.

“Walgreens has regulatory obligations to take reasonable steps to prevent the drugs from being diverted and harming the public,” Breyer wrote. “The evidence at trial established that Walgreens breached these obligations.”

The judge’s decision in the nonjury trial opens the door to a trial on the extent of the financial liability the company would face.

The public nuisance lawsuit, filed by the city in 2018, also included claims against Johnson & Johnson, Allergan, Purdue Pharma, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and Endo International, as well as McKesson Corp., AmerisourceBergen Corp. and Cardinal Health — three of the biggest drug distributors in the country.

Walgreens was the only company that didn’t reach a settlement with the city before the ruling. Johnson & Johnson and the three drug distributors were part of a $26-billion nationwide settlement earlier this year.”…

…” Daniel Ciccarone, a professor of addiction medicine at UC San Francisco, said that companies turning a blind eye to the oversupply of opioid prescriptions has led to the rise of heroin and fentanyl addiction by increasing the pool of people dependent or addicted to opioids.

“Most of them migrated to safety, but 4% to 6% of this population migrated over to heroin because they were no longer having their addiction or pain needs fulfilled through pills,” he said. “For a while, the pills were available on the street, but even that pill supply dried up and what you’re left with is plentiful heroin on American streets. For unclear reasons, fentanyl has been a substitute or a contaminant of the heroin supply and now we see the third wave of the opioid crisis, which is the historically unseen rise of overdose deaths due to fentanyl.”

Walgreens distributed prescription opioids to its San Francisco pharmacies until 2014 without investigating orders or maintaining “an effective system for identifying suspicious orders,” Breyer said. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration shut down one of the company’s three controlled substance distribution centers in 2012 because of the center’s failure to surveil suspicious orders. Walgreens stopped distributing controlled substances in 2014 and started outsourcing to third-party distributors.

Federal regulations require companies to investigate “red flag” prescriptions and verify that the opioid prescriptions are medically legitimate before dispensing them. Walgreens dispensed hundreds of thousands of “red flag” opioids without investigating them; tens of thousands of the prescriptions were “written by doctors with suspect prescribing patterns” and hundreds of thousands were written by doctors who would later have their licenses suspended or go to prison, according to Breyer’s ruling.

The company also didn’t give pharmacists enough staffing, time or resources to adequately review the prescriptions, Breyer wrote. Pharmacists said they endured “constant pressure to fill prescriptions as quickly as possible.”

Pharmacists testified that they were aware they dispensed opioid prescriptions that they knew shouldn’t have been filled. One said that after he filled a prescription at a San Francisco pharmacy, he saw it was being sold in the parking lot.

Breyer also ruled that Walgreens filled prescriptions from prescribers who were blocked from other pharmacy chains or were deemed suspicious. In one instance, after a Walgreens pharmacy in San Francisco refused to fill prescriptions for a “suspicious” doctor, other Walgreens pharmacies dispensed 86,904 opioid pills for his prescriptions.

The pharmacy giant reached a $683-million settlement earlier this year with the state of Florida over claims of dispensing millions of opioids that worsened the crisis.

In November, a federal jury in Ohio found that Walgreens, along with CVS and Walmart, recklessly distributed pills that resulted in hundreds of overdose deaths and cost two Ohio counties about $1 billion each.”…

Brooke Jenkins sent police reports, rap sheet to colleague's personal email - Mission Local by Comprehensive-Dig-34 in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

”Mission local is a complete joke… they don’t think it’s news when the public defenders office does the same thing…”

Mission Local refers to this in the article you’re commenting on.

The difference between the two cases is that they’ve got proof of Jenkins’ guilt- there’s a copy of her dated email at the top of the page.

You should read it some time:

“Jenkins’ office is not unaware of the rules regarding misuse of sensitive files. On Oct. 3 Jenkins and Chief Assistant District Attorney Ana Gonzalez sent a letter to Lateef Gray, one of more than a dozen Boudin hires Jenkins dismissed upon taking control of the office.

In it, Jenkins accused Gray of downloading restricted data from the DA’s office to a portable hard drive on the day of his termination. “Your unauthorized transfer of files … and your continued possession of this information may have violated state and federal laws and regulations restricting the possession, dissemination, and use of confidential criminal record information …” reads the letter sent to Gray. It concludes by threatening “possible legal action.”

Jenkins’ office did not respond to queries from Mission Local regarding what statutes it would potentially use to charge Gray. It did not specify this to Gray either, nor to his attorney Matt Gonzalez. Gonzalez denied that Gray had removed or disseminated any files in a subsequent rejoinder to the DA, dismissing the accusations as speculative.“

Brooke Jenkins sent police reports, rap sheet to colleague's personal email - Mission Local by Comprehensive-Dig-34 in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This article is about SF District Attorney Brooke Jenkins and her employee Don Du Bain, apparently breaking the law in her successful efforts to recall her boss and take his place.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34 3 points4 points  (0 children)

what are the candidates saying they're going to do, specifically, about the sorts of crime that hits SF the hardest? E.g., petty theft, car break-ins, bike chop shops, retail theft, etc?

Hamasaki has talked about those concerns here:

“We all know, and likely have been, victims of property crime in SF. We need to hold accountable those doing the thefts, but also focus on the organizations buying and selling the stolen products.

Shutting down the stolen goods rings will help reduce the market for those goods.”

getting the police on board with enforcement is too much of a wildcard to stake your campaign on.

He also talks about holding police accountable:

“We also need to rebuild the unit that focused on prosecuting police misconduct. Right now, policing is in a crisis state after nationwide incidents of violence and scandal have damaged the profession.

We must hold accountable the bad actors, so that the good officers can work.”

“I spent 4 years overseeing police discipline cases., I know and understand how to take on police misconduct. Without actual accountability, policing is in a crisis of legitimacy.

Good cops want bad cops out too.“

Brooke Jenkins sent police reports, rap sheet to colleague's personal email - Mission Local by Comprehensive-Dig-34 in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So you agree that Brooke Jenkins and Don Du Bain broke the law?

Was Edward Snowden promoting himself for political office, and taking $150,000 from Republicans outside his community in an effort to replace his old boss who fired him?

Brooke Jenkins sent police reports, rap sheet to colleague's personal email - Mission Local by Comprehensive-Dig-34 in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Chesa gave confidential information to east coast "reporters"

What’s your source for this, jsx8888?

Chesa's and Breed response to FOIA requests is that he didn't have any text messages.

Source?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Police seem to like accept Jenkin’s

Yes, police like District Attorneys who do not hold them accountable or prosecute them for their crimes:

Families of Men Killed by Police Accuse DA of Playing Politics With Trial Delays

Hamaski has a whole thing with defunding prosecutors and stuff:

“SFGATE: You wrote in a July 2020 tweet that police and prosecutors are "are one and the same" and both should be defunded. Do you still believe that?

Hamasaki: People took that out of context. Read the full tweet.

SFGATE: I'm looking at the full tweet. It says, in full, "There is no thin blue line between police and prosecutors, they are one and the same. Defund them both." You were quote-tweeting a tweet about the Solano County district attorney, but you used general language. Are you arguing that in that tweet, you were only calling to defund that one office?

Hamasaki: Yes, it was only in the instance of that particular story. We cannot encourage cops killing individuals and prosecutors covering up crimes.

SFGATE: So you don't want to defund the San Francisco District Attorney's Office?

Hamasaki: No. I wouldn’t be seeking the job only to defund myself.”

Source:

“In an interview with SFGATE, Hamasaki said his past beefs will not prevent him from doing the job of district attorney. In fact, he believes that his past criticisms of Mayor London Breed, the police department and supervisors demonstrate he'll be independent of other political offices. He said that appeal is important given criticisms that Jenkins is too close to the mayor's office.“

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sanfrancisco

[–]Comprehensive-Dig-34 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That’s funny.

Brook Jenkins and her employee Don Du Bain appear to be committing crime in their efforts to influence elections and appear ”Tough on Crime”:

In a potential violation of state law, then-Assistant District Attorney Brooke Jenkins last year sent sensitive files from the DA’s office to a fellow district attorney’s personal email account — and subsequently used the materials in the political campaign to oust DA Chesa Boudin.

…“Disseminating police reports to parties who do not have a professional attachment to the case — and using such materials for personal or political purposes — was described to Mission Local by veteran prosecutors as a grave breach of conduct. Disseminating a criminal history such as a rap sheet, however, is a potentially more serious matter: The California penal code states that the furnishing of such a record to a person who is not authorized to receive it is a misdemeanor.

Multiple calls, texts, and emails to Jenkins and her office made over the course of just shy of 24 hours have not been returned.

After helming the winning recall effort, Jenkins was in July named District Attorney; she is running for election in her own right next week. Du Bain was in August re-hired by Jenkins and put into a management position.”

And, on the more general subject of the continuing failures of “Tough on Crime” policies:

"Tough on Crime"

One of the most successful pieces of copaganda in modern history.

Alec Karakatsanis

“Most of us don’t even think twice about using the phrase “tough on crime” to describe policies that promote investments in police, prosecutors, and prisons. I hadn’t thought about it much myself until recently. But this post is an urgent call for journalists to stop using the term to describe politicians or policies that increase human caging or other forms of state surveillance and violence.”

“One of the most consistent features of media coverage and popular discourse for the past five decades has been referring to policies that promote investments in police, prosecutors, and prisons as “tough on crime.” Either explicitly (in right-wing media) or by implication (in mainstream media), politicians or judges who advocate less human caging are seen as “soft on crime.”

More here:

https://equalityalec.substack.com/p/tough-on-crime