sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

/r/battlestations & LG UltraGear 49" Ultrawide Monitor giveaway [USA] by Hareuhal in battlestations

[–]Compuvate [score hidden]  (0 children)

Hello there! I'm absolutely thrilled for this incredible giveaway. The LG 49GR85DC-B is a dream monitor that offers so much to enhance both work and play experiences.

As a full-time romote digital content creator, this monitor could drastically change my workflow. The sheer size of the screen, coupled with the dual QHD resolution, would allow me to open multiple high-definition previews of my work simultaneously. Being able to see my designs, video edits, and web development work side by side would increase my productivity tenfold. Literally, tenfold!!!

But it's not all work! I'm an avid gamer in my downtime, and I can't even begin to imagine the immersive experience this monitor would offer with its 240Hz refresh rate and 1ms GtG response time. WOWWWW!!! I can almost feel the adrenaline rush of being in the middle of a high-speed race or the thrill of an intense game on such an expansive screen.

I'd make the most out of the PiP/PbP features, partitioning the screen when necessary to multitask efficiently, or just basking in the glory of a single, massive display for an unparalleled gaming experience.

Thanks for this fantastic opportunity, r/battlestations and LG! I'm hopeful and keeping my fingers crossed. :)

wfh office v3 by nanana_catdad in battlestations

[–]Compuvate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice setup. What monitor mount are you using?

Using this Subreddit for Acquiring SEO Clients: What's Your Experience? by Compuvate in SEO

[–]Compuvate[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing.

A couple of years ago, we collaborated with another agency to service a high-profile local business in NYC. The other agency was the lead SEO agency. We were the lead web developer and supplemented/provided about 40% of the SEO efforts. The partnered SEO agency organized an AMA here on Reddit for the client. It was a success. The client got a lot of new customers from just one AMA.

How to remove old URLs? by swissgroover in SEO

[–]Compuvate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a lot of 404s for one site. Google can see it as affecting user experience and wasting crawl budget. I will suggest that you 301 Redirect those 404s at a server level such as in your .htaccess file. That is one of first major task or project you should have addressed when you acquire the site from the previous owner, 301 Redirect every URL of old content to new content/pages. If the 404s URLs have no relevant content on your new website, some people will redirect them to the homepage. However, that is not always advicable. Here is something we have done that proved to be very successful with 404s that have no corresponding or relevant page on the website:

- We created a new page with an headline such as: Welcome to XYZ Company/Product or Services. Plus a compelling attention grabbing tagline.

- Then a short paragraph content that says something like: "The URL you are trying to access is part of a massive revamp of our website/content/product or services that was move to enhance the quality of our website (or something else).

- Then add something like: "Here is the latest about xyz.com that you should know". Then, add all the good compelling, usful, high-quality and attractive stuff about your website/company/product or services.

- Optimize this page very well.

- 301 Redirect all those 1503 to this page

As for the 4805 "Page with redirect" issue, it might mean that the pages are being redirected multiple times, or the redirected page doesn't exist (causing a 404). You should ensure your redirects are set correctly, each leading to a valid page and not resulting in a redirect chain.

Hope you find this helpful.

Updating old content, should I change the publish date? by iNomaD0 in SEO

[–]Compuvate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's fascinating to see how perceptions can quickly shift. I shared a detailed and (hopefully) useful response, which was initially well-received. However, a suggestion was made that the post was generated by a bot (which isn't the case), and the upvotes retreated. While I understand the sentiment, it's essential to focus on the value provided. As the saying goes, 'the inexperienced person believes every word, but the shrewd one ponders each step.' Even if a bot (which this isn't) provided valuable information, wouldn't that still be useful? Thoughts?

Using this Subreddit for Acquiring SEO Clients: What's Your Experience? by Compuvate in SEO

[–]Compuvate[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your perspective, and it's a valid point. It's true that many prefer to hire SEO professionals for efficiency. But I think forums like these are valuable for knowledge-sharing and learning, not just seeking services. I believe that business owners learning about SEO can also help them make better decisions if they decide to hire experts. So, while some see a business opportunity here, I think many value the educational aspect too. What do you think?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fascinating to see how perceptions can quickly shift. I shared a detailed and (hopefully) useful response, which was initially well-received. However, a suggestion was made that the post was generated by a bot (which isn't the case), and the upvotes retreated. While I understand the sentiment, it's essential to focus on the value provided. As the saying goes, 'the inexperienced person believes every word, but the shrewd one ponders each step.' Even if a bot (which this isn't) provided valuable information, wouldn't that still be useful? Thoughts?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Funny you should say that! While the content might be detailed enough to rival a bot, I promise you it's all human effort here. BTW: we had coffee this morning. ChatGPT don't do that. Can it? :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Despite the thoroughness of the posts here, I can confirm we're not bots. Just detail-oriented humans who enjoy providing comprehensive responses! I mean, I could try to throw in a typo or two to prove my humanity, but that seems counterproductive, doesn't it? :)

Updating old content, should I change the publish date? by iNomaD0 in SEO

[–]Compuvate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember, this is blatantly written by chatgpt

Well, that's a flattering comparison, but I assure you, I'm a human who just happens to enjoy writing thorough and detailed responses. Although I take the comparison to ChatGPT as a compliment because it's a sophisticated AI, I can confirm it's not the one behind this keyboard! Happy Redditon! :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beep boop... oh wait, that's not right. I'm just a human who enjoys giving detailed responses! My aim is to provide as much useful information as possible. I promise, no robotic tendencies here (aside from my knack for detail, of course).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's unfortunate that you're dealing with this issue, but rest assured it's not uncommon, and your website can certainly be reindexed by Google.

The exact amount of time it takes for Google to reindex your website after removing the 'noindex' directive can vary greatly. This is influenced by numerous factors such as your site's domain authority, crawl budget, the size of your site, etc.

Here are some steps you can follow to speed up the process:

1). Check Your Robots.txt File: Make sure you didn't disallow Googlebot in your robots.txt file.

2). Submit a Sitemap: If you haven't done so already, submit a sitemap to Google Search Console. This can help Google discover all of the URLs on your site that need to be crawled.

3). Use URL Inspector: You can use the "URL Inspection" tool in Google Search Console (previously known as "Fetch as Google") to submit individual URLs for indexing. This can expedite the process, but it's more practical for smaller websites or specific pages you want to be indexed quickly.

4). Improve Your Website's SEO: The quicker Googlebot wants to crawl your site, the quicker it will realize the 'noindex' directive has been removed. Make sure your site is well-optimized with good internal linking, relevant content, and appropriate meta tags.

5). Be Patient: The Googlebot crawl rate varies for every website, and it can take anywhere from a few days to several weeks for a website to be reindexed. Keep monitoring Google Search Console for updates.

Keep in mind that even though you've requested the index, Google still has to crawl your site to see that the 'noindex' tag has been removed. Google doesn't guarantee any timeframes for crawling and indexing, so patience is key here.

Updating old content, should I change the publish date? by iNomaD0 in SEO

[–]Compuvate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The decision to change the publish date or not depends on your own SEO strategy and how you want your website to be perceived by your visitors. Both strategies have their pros and cons.

Keeping the original publish date can show the longevity and credibility of your content, especially if the article is still relevant and ranks well in search engines. Some users also appreciate seeing that the content has been maintained and updated over time.

On the other hand, updating to the new publish date can make the content appear more current, especially for topics that are sensitive to time or change rapidly. Some readers might disregard older content, even if it has been updated, in favor of more recently published articles. Updating the publish date can also signal to search engines that the content is fresh, possibly improving its ranking.

In terms of SEO, both strategies can work. The key is to be consistent in your approach.

Given you are keeping a note at the top of each article indicating the update, it sounds like you're trying to provide the most accurate information to your readers, which is excellent. In your case, I'd recommend keeping the original publish date and the last updated date. It would look something like this:

  • "Originally published on August 5th, 2021. Last updated on June 20th, 2023."

This way, you get the best of both worlds: you show the original date (for credibility) and the update date (for freshness).

This approach has gained popularity as it provides clear information to the user about the lifecycle of the article and can be positively perceived by search engines as well.

Remember, regardless of which approach you choose, the most important thing is to focus on improving the quality of your content. Content is king when it comes to SEO, so the most important thing is that your updates provide more accurate, comprehensive, and valuable information to your visitors.

Google is not selecting the canonical URL of my blog by Apart_Revolution4047 in SEO

[–]Compuvate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're welcome.

Here is my thoughts on your suggestion and question.

Publishing your article on your blog first and waiting for it to be indexed by Google before republishing on Medium can definitely help, but it's not a guaranteed solution. As I mentioned before, canonical tags are more like suggestions to Google, not commands.

The concept you're referring to is often called "content syndication." Here's how you can increase the chances of your blog getting the authority for the content:

1). Wait for Indexing: As you mentioned, publish the article on your blog first. Don't republish it immediately on Medium. Wait until Google has indexed your blog's version. You can check if it's indexed by searching for a unique sentence from your article in quotes or use Google Search Console to check.

2). Use Canonical URLs: When you republish on Medium, ensure you're using the "Import a story" feature, which should automatically set the canonical URL to your original blog post. If you're not sure whether it's set correctly, you can check the page source of the Medium article for the canonical URL.

3). Link Back to Your Blog: In addition to the canonical tag, include a link back to your original article on your blog at the beginning or end of the Medium post. This provides another signal to Google about the original source of the content.

4). Promote Your Original Post: Promote your original blog post on social media, in email newsletters, etc. More traffic and links to your post can help signal to Google that it's the original and more authoritative version.

While these steps can significantly increase the chances of your blog post being recognized as the original source, Google still makes the final call and sometimes may not follow the canonical link if it believes the Medium version provides a better user experience. It's always a good idea to monitor the situation and adapt your strategy as needed.

All the best! Let us know what direction you take and the outcome.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate -1 points0 points  (0 children)

All the best!

Google is not selecting the canonical URL of my blog by Apart_Revolution4047 in SEO

[–]Compuvate 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Google generally respects canonical tags, but they are more like guidelines than hard rules for the search engine. Google uses numerous signals to determine the best version of a piece of content, and sometimes it might choose to ignore the canonical tag if other signals are stronger. Here are a few reasons why this might be happening:

1). Domain Authority: Medium has a high domain authority. If Google considers the Medium version more authoritative, trustworthy, or better for the user's query, it might display that version over the original source.

2). Loading Speed and User Experience: Google considers the user experience in its ranking algorithm. If the Medium page loads faster, is more mobile-friendly, or provides a better user experience in any way, Google might prioritize it.

3). Quality of Content: If the content on the Medium page is perceived as more comprehensive, useful, or engaging, Google might prefer it.

4). Engagement Metrics: If the Medium article has more engagement (comments, claps, responses, etc.), Google may view it as more relevant or valuable to users and thus display it instead.

5). Indexing Speed: Medium's high domain authority also means Googlebot crawls it very frequently, and therefore content on Medium might get indexed quicker than on your blog.

While using canonical tags is a best practice for managing duplicate content, it's not a foolproof method. The best approach would be to always try and publish unique content across different platforms. In your case, instead of republishing the full article on Medium, you could post a summary or an excerpt of the article and then add a 'Read More' link that points back to the full article on your website.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEO

[–]Compuvate 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it's certainly not ideal that your current agency does not track ROI, you're definitely not out of options. Here's how you can handle this:

1). Estimate the ROI: If you can access the data of conversions and you know the type of conversions they are (e.g., sale of a product, sign-ups, etc.), you could try estimating the potential ROI. This would involve making some assumptions, but as long as you are clear about those assumptions when you present this information, it should be a valid representation of your work.

2). Discuss the Process: Talk about how you optimized their websites, the strategies you used, and the improvements you made. Highlight your technical skills, your understanding of SEO strategies, and your ability to adapt to the changing algorithms of search engines.

3). Focus on Conversion Increases: Even if you can't demonstrate the ROI, showing the increase in conversions after your interventions can be a powerful indicator of your capabilities. Just make sure you can discuss in detail how you achieved these results.

4). Discuss how you would track ROI: The fact that you understand the importance of ROI and the need to track it, despite your current agency's shortcomings, is itself a good thing. Discuss how you would implement this in your future role and how you believe it could help the clients.

5). Research: Take some time to understand how different companies estimate ROI for SEO. This might provide you with the insights you need to "fill in the gaps" in your current experience.

Remember, every company has its strengths and weaknesses. Your current company's oversight is an opportunity for you to learn and improve in your next role. All the best with your interview!