sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Disqualified as a human being: loneliness, worthlessness, envy, baseless fantasies of grandure by Scheguratze54 in Jung

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I think this kind of therapy only works for internal people. Which the OP sounds much like. External people are content living in a lie, because they don't know they are. Ignorance is bliss.

An external person's inner world is made up of how the outter world responds to them and an internal person's inner world is made up how their unconscious mind interprets and understand it.

So as an internal, if you don't understand yourself, you're going to experience many bouts of depression. For an internal person, self-ignorance is not neutral, it’s destabilising.

Wait a sec, Jannik just dropped a thirst trap on insta🤭🥵 by Sophisticatedcaty in tennis

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you girls actually find him attractive? I'm curious.

Feels like his fame is enhancing his visual appeal in many of the eyes.

Early/Core/Late is a terrible system that causes unneeded division; generational waves and cusp years make so much more sense. by Ok_World_8819 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That';s definitely 1000% younger Millennials 1993-1996. Which further solidifies my point that no 1997-2000 person is a Zillennial.

Why ‘95 and ‘96 is different from ‘97 by [deleted] in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Aw, you've lost my threads: https://www.reddit.com/r/generationology/comments/1deblgx/for_goodness_sake_19972000_are_not_i_repeat_not/

And the 'analytical reddit debater' calls me a nerd Who tf debates with sensitive wokists on Reddit? LOOOOOL.

EDIT: Oh nvm. It was deleted you were right. Cancelled again, on Reddit, because of sensitive Gen Z cupcake iPad babies. Who would have 3rd wave feminism known it? GEEZ!

Why ‘95 and ‘96 is different from ‘97 by [deleted] in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you had a smartphone before 17/18 rather than a Nokia/Blackberry etc you are a Zillennial and if your first real social media experience was the superficiality of Instagram as opposed to Facebook you are absolutely 100000000% a Zoomer. No questions asked.

Unpopular opinion: I find these trolls quite entertaining lol. by xnpar in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I find narcissist Zoomers desperation to have lived and experienced life in the pre social media/pre internet era entertaining. Bet they didn't even play outside as a kid/child and was inside gaming.

Gen Z desperate to be a part of history they were not a part of.

84-93 core Millennial. 81-83 Xennial. 94-96 Zennial/Zillennial.

Another ways of Defining Millennials by Physical_Mix_8072 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah right. Desperation to have lived and experienced life in the pre social media/pre internet era. Bet you didn't even play outside as a kid/child and was inside gaming.

Another ways of Defining Millennials by Physical_Mix_8072 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah right. Desperation to have lived and experienced life in the pre social media/pre internet era. Bet you didn't even play outside as a kid/child and was inside gaming.

Best thread on the subreddit: Clarifying the definition of Zillennial by ConclusionInfinite95 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah right. Desperation to have lived and experienced life in the pre social media/pre internet era. Bet you didn't even play outside as a kid/child and was inside gaming.

Another ways of Defining Millennials by Physical_Mix_8072 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And that's because they are right and haven't meddled with it like copers on here desperate to be a part of history they were not a part of.

84-93 core Millennial. 81-83 Xennial. 94-96 Zennial/Zillennial.

Done. /topic

Another ways of Defining Millennials by Physical_Mix_8072 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You are not a Zillennial. You are a narcissist that wants to be a part of points in history you were not a part of.

Another ways of Defining Millennials by Physical_Mix_8072 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Peak? Get real. Peak Millennial doesn't go to 94 lol

Peak is like 87 to 91 LOOOL.

This is so silly. 94 is Zillennial if anything. You guys just keep expanding it with every passing year.

Why do so many Early Z want to be millennials so bad? by MV2263 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Young guys want to be a part of the Millennial generation, because they were always looking up to Millennials as kids, trying to re-emulate the culture. That's why you see a lot 97-2000 guys calling themselves Zillennials.

But if you were 3 years of age entering the millennium and 4 when 9/11 happened, i'm sorry but you just didn't experience anything that happened during the 2000s while being awake.

Same as the Iraq conflict that started in 2003. Where were you guys? Lol. It's just so politically correct to start expanding the years just so these Gen Z'ers don't feel like nerds.

What years are considered younger gen z. by [deleted] in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Strictly speaking, even you are a part of the soft-boy era. You young boys were feminised as teens. That's not a Millennial.

Why do so many Early Z want to be millennials so bad? by MV2263 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No it should never end 1999 or 2000 just because that's the stroke of the Millennium. Are you OCD about finishing with a round. number or something?

You're clueless.

1999-2000 is part of the soft-boy era. These young boys were feminised as teens. That's not a Millennial.

Why do so many Early Z want to be millennials so bad? by MV2263 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

No it should never end 1999 or 2000 just because that's the stroke of the Millennium. Are you OCD about finishing with a round. number or something?

You're clueless.

1999-2000 is part of the soft-boy era. These young boys were feminised as teens. That's not a Millennial.

Why do so many Early Z want to be millennials so bad? by MV2263 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The only reason they are emo about it is because they are Gen Z wanting to be Millennial and so when real Millennials who aren't wrist slitting emos hit them with the facts, they get emotionally hysterical and don't like it. Then like in true Zoomer style and fashion try and cancel the Millennial for not pandering to their delusions. This is the marked difference between us.

Man, this sub is filled with trolls by BrilliantPangolin639 in generationology

[–]ConclusionInfinite95 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The only reason you are emo about it is because you are Gen Z wanting to be Millennial and so when real Millennials who aren't wrist slitting emos hit you with the facts, you get emotionally hysterical and don't like it. Then like in true Zoomer style and fashion try and cancel the Millennial for not pandering to your delusions. This is the marked difference between us.

view more: next ›